{"corpus":"Blockchain Lab Research Corpus","licence":null,"note":"Metadata only. Paper text is not included. Attribute Blockchain Lab if you republish this catalogue. The catalogue is not a licence to the papers.","count":607,"papers":[{"document_id":"BLC-PAPER-0001","slug":"bitcoin","title":"Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System","authors":"Satoshi Nakamoto","year":2008,"date_label":"31 October 2008, the date of the cryptography mailing-list post. The PDF fetched from bitcoin.org does not print that date on the first page.","publisher":"Satoshi Nakamoto","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Digital cash","topics":["Digital cash","Proof of work","Double spend"],"source_url":"https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf","source_label":"bitcoin.org","legacy_pdf_path":"/pdf/bitcoin.pdf","sha256":"b1674191a88ec5cdd733e4240a81803105dc412d6c6708d53ab94fc248f4f553","sha256_note":"SHA-256 of the PDF fetched from https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf on 1 October 2026 (184,292 bytes). This is not a hash of the historic library file at /pdf/bitcoin.pdf. That file is not stored in this build and was not byte-compared.","version":"File served by bitcoin.org on 1 October 2026","doi":null,"rights_status":"Rights uncertain","source_status":"Official source, and a historic library path","use_status":"Download from the publisher. The legacy path remains. Full text is not republished here.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence notice on the first page of the file fetched from bitcoin.org. Not marked public domain.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"The paper proposes that a public chain of hash-linked blocks, and a race to spend computation, can order electronic-cash payments without a bank in the middle.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bitcoin","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bitcoin","study_url":null,"last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-PAPER-0002","slug":"ethereum","title":"Ethereum: A Next-Generation Smart Contract and Decentralized Application Platform","authors":"Vitalik Buterin","year":2014,"date_label":"Circulating white paper, 2014. Drafts exist from late 2013. This record follows the historic library file, not the living HTML on ethereum.org.","publisher":"Vitalik Buterin","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Contracts","topics":["Smart contracts","General-purpose chain"],"source_url":"https://ethereum.org/en/whitepaper/","source_label":"ethereum.org white paper (current HTML, not the historic PDF)","legacy_pdf_path":"/pdf/Ethereum_white_paper-a_next_generation_smart_contract_and_decentralized_application_platform-vitalik-buterin.pdf","sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Historic library PDF of Buterin's white paper. The publisher's current page is HTML and has moved on.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Rights uncertain","source_status":"Publisher's current page, plus a historic library path","use_status":"Read the publisher's page or the legacy PDF. Full text is not republished here.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"Buterin's white paper argues that a chain can do more than move a native coin. It can run programs whose results land in shared state.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/ethereum","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/ethereum","study_url":null,"last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-PAPER-0003","slug":"ouroboros","title":"Ouroboros: A Provably Secure Proof-of-Stake Blockchain Protocol","authors":"Aggelos Kiayias, Alexander Russell, Bernardo David, Roman Oliynykov","year":2017,"date_label":"IACR ePrint 2016/889. A proceedings version followed. This record is the ePrint, not a later Cardano paper.","publisher":"IACR ePrint","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Proof of stake","Slot leaders"],"source_url":"https://eprint.iacr.org/2016/889.pdf","source_label":"IACR ePrint 2016/889","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"ePrint 2016/889. Praos, Genesis, and later network software are other documents.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. Read the PDF at IACR.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"Ouroboros elects slot leaders from stake and states the security argument in a synchronous model. Cardano is a later network. A staking rate is not part of the paper.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/ouroboros","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/ouroboros","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/ouroboros","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-PAPER-0004","slug":"lightning","title":"The Bitcoin Lightning Network: Scalable Off-Chain Instant Payments","authors":"Joseph Poon and Thaddeus Dryja","year":2016,"date_label":"2016 draft. Cite the PDF you opened. Versions of this paper differ.","publisher":"Joseph Poon and Thaddeus Dryja","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Payment channels","Bitcoin"],"source_url":"https://lightning.network/lightning-network-paper.pdf","source_label":"lightning.network paper","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"PDF linked from lightning.network. Not a specification of today's channel implementations.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. Read the PDF at the publisher.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"Lightning is a payment channel on Bitcoin. The base chain is the court when a party cheats or leaves, not the till for every payment.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/lightning","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/lightning","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/lightning","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-PAPER-0005","slug":"interledger","title":"A Protocol for Interledger Payments","authors":"Stefan Thomas and Evan Schwartz","year":2015,"date_label":"2015, as the Interledger Foundation dates the protocol's creation. The PDF's first page, as checked for this record, does not print a full citation date.","publisher":"Stefan Thomas and Evan Schwartz","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Interoperability","topics":["Cross-ledger payments","Escrow","Connectors"],"source_url":"https://interledger.org/documents/interledger.pdf","source_label":"interledger.org PDF","legacy_pdf_path":"/pdf/interledger.pdf","sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"The white paper. ILPv4 and later RFCs are other documents.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Rights uncertain","source_status":"Official PDF, and a historic library path","use_status":"Download from the publisher. The legacy path remains. Full text is not republished here.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"The paper proposes payments that cross ledgers by escrow, through connectors, without one blockchain ordering every transfer.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/interledger","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/interledger","study_url":null,"last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-PAPER-0006","slug":"maker-dai","title":"The Dai Stablecoin System","authors":"MakerDAO","year":2017,"date_label":"2017, as cited by the study. Later multi-collateral systems are other documents.","publisher":"MakerDAO","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Credit and stable value","topics":["Collateralised stable value","Vaults"],"source_url":"https://makerdao.com/whitepaper/","source_label":"MakerDAO white paper","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"The 2017 Dai design in the study's citation. Not a description of a later module.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"The 2017 paper describes Dai as a liability minted against overcollateralised vaults, kept near a dollar target by a fee, an auction, and an emergency stop.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/maker-dai","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/maker-dai","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/maker-dai","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-PAPER-0007","slug":"terra-money","title":"Terra Money: Stability and Adoption","authors":"Do Kwon","year":2019,"date_label":"2019. The study names Do Kwon. Other names appear on some circulating copies and are not added here until reconciled.","publisher":"Terra","paper_type":"Failure case","category":"Credit and stable value","topics":["Stable value","Seigniorage"],"source_url":"https://agora.terra.money/","source_label":"Terra research archive, as cited by the study","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"The 2019 design paper. Not a description of any later chain that reused the name.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. Not a design to copy.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"The 2019 paper proposes fiat-pegged tokens stabilised by an arbitrage against a second, volatile token. This library keeps it as a failure case, not as a blueprint.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/terra-money","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/terra-money","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/terra-money","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-PAPER-0008","slug":"chainlink","title":"Chainlink: A Decentralized Oracle Network","authors":"Steve Ellis, Ari Juels, Sergey Nazarov","year":2017,"date_label":"2017","publisher":"Chainlink","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Oracles","Off-chain data"],"source_url":"https://chain.link/whitepaper","source_label":"Chainlink white paper","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"The 2017 oracle-network paper. A single operator feed is a narrower object.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"The paper describes independent nodes that fetch a fact from outside a chain, aggregate it, and deliver a signed result, with a reputation and penalty story around the nodes.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/chainlink","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/chainlink","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/chainlink","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-PAPER-0009","slug":"filecoin-2017","title":"Filecoin: A Decentralized Storage Network","authors":"Protocol Labs","year":2017,"date_label":"July 2017","publisher":"Protocol Labs","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Storage and networks","topics":["Storage market","Proof of replication"],"source_url":"https://www.filecoin.io/assets/documents/filecoin.pdf","source_label":"Filecoin 2017 paper","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"July 2017 paper. The historic filecoin.pdf is an earlier sketch and a different record.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"The July 2017 paper specifies a storage market and a retrieval market. Miners are supposed to prove they still hold a replica, and to keep proving it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/filecoin-2017","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/filecoin-2017","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/filecoin-2017","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-PAPER-0010","slug":"corda","title":"Corda: An Introduction","authors":"Richard Gendal Brown, James Carlyle, Ian Grigg, Mike Hearn","year":2016,"date_label":"August 2016","publisher":"R3","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Institutional ledger","topics":["Permissioned ledger","Known parties"],"source_url":"https://www.researchgate.net/publication/308636477_Corda_An_Introduction","source_label":"ResearchGate record of the August 2016 introduction","legacy_pdf_path":"/pdf/corda-introductory-whitepaper-final.pdf","sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"August 2016 introduction. R3 says the 2018 platform paper supersedes it.","doi":"10.13140/RG.2.2.30487.37284","rights_status":"Rights uncertain","source_status":"Published record, and a historic library path","use_status":"Read the publisher's record. The legacy path remains. Full text is not republished here.","licence":null,"licence_label":"ResearchGate marks the upload as possibly subject to copyright. No redistribution licence is recorded.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"The introduction argues for a ledger of deals between identified institutions, where the parties to a deal hold the data, rather than a global broadcast of every transaction.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/corda","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/corda","study_url":null,"last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-PDF-0001","slug":"ethereum-yellow-paper","title":"Ethereum: A Secure Decentralised Generalised Transaction Ledger (EIP-150 revision)","authors":"Gavin Wood","year":2016,"date_label":"EIP-150 revision, which is how the historic library names the file. The living yellow paper has moved on.","publisher":"Gavin Wood","paper_type":"Protocol specification","category":"Contracts","topics":["Ethereum","Specification"],"source_url":"https://ethereum.github.io/yellowpaper/paper.pdf","source_label":"Current yellow paper (later document)","legacy_pdf_path":"/pdf/paper2.pdf","sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Historic library file described as the EIP-150 revision. Not byte-compared with the living yellow paper.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Rights uncertain","source_status":"Historic library path. The current yellow paper is a later file.","use_status":"Legacy path remains. Do not treat the current yellow paper as this file.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"The historic library holds Wood's yellow paper at the EIP-150 revision, as a specification of the ledger rather than Buterin's white paper.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/ethereum-yellow-paper","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/ethereum-yellow-paper","study_url":null,"last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-PDF-0002","slug":"ripple-consensus","title":"The Ripple Protocol Consensus Algorithm","authors":"David Schwartz, Noah Youngs, and Arthur Britto","year":2014,"date_label":"2014, as commonly cited for this title. Not re-read from the file bytes in this build.","publisher":"Ripple","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus","Known validators"],"source_url":"https://ripple.com/files/ripple_consensus_whitepaper.pdf","source_label":"Commonly cited publisher PDF","legacy_pdf_path":"/pdf/ripple_consensus_whitepaper.pdf","sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Historic library file. Not byte-compared with the publisher URL.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Rights uncertain","source_status":"Historic library path, plus a commonly cited publisher URL","use_status":"Legacy path remains. Full text is not republished.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"The library holds the Ripple consensus paper: agreement among servers that choose which other servers they listen to, rather than a race to spend hash power.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/ripple-consensus","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/ripple-consensus","study_url":null,"last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-PDF-0003","slug":"stellar-consensus","title":"The Stellar Consensus Protocol: A Federated Model for Internet-level Consensus","authors":"David Mazières","year":2015,"date_label":"2015, as commonly cited. The library index truncates the title; the full title is used here. Bytes were not re-opened.","publisher":"Stellar Development Foundation","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Federated consensus"],"source_url":"https://www.stellar.org/papers/stellar-consensus-protocol.pdf","source_label":"stellar.org paper","legacy_pdf_path":"/pdf/stellar-consensus-protocol.pdf","sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Historic library file. Not byte-compared with the publisher PDF.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Rights uncertain","source_status":"Historic library path, plus the publisher's paper page","use_status":"Legacy path remains. Full text is not republished.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"Mazières's paper gives a federated way to reach agreement: each node picks quorum slices, and safety depends on how those slices intersect.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/stellar-consensus","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/stellar-consensus","study_url":null,"last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-PDF-0004","slug":"pegged-sidechains","title":"Enabling Blockchain Innovations with Pegged Sidechains","authors":"Back et al.","year":2014,"date_label":"2014, as commonly cited for this title. Not re-read from the file bytes in this build.","publisher":"The authors","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Sidechains","Bitcoin"],"source_url":"https://blockstream.com/sidechains.pdf","source_label":"Commonly cited PDF","legacy_pdf_path":"/pdf/sidechains1.pdf","sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Historic library file sidechains1.pdf.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Rights uncertain","source_status":"Historic library path","use_status":"Legacy path remains. Full text is not republished.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"The library holds the pegged-sidechains paper associated with Adam Back and co-authors: a chain beside Bitcoin, with a two-way peg so coins can move across and back.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/pegged-sidechains","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/pegged-sidechains","study_url":null,"last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-PDF-0005","slug":"tether","title":"Tether: Fiat currencies on the Bitcoin blockchain","authors":"Not named in this record","year":null,"date_label":"Historic library file. A publication year was not verified from the bytes in this build.","publisher":"Tether","paper_type":"Historic library file","category":"Credit and stable value","topics":["Stable value","Issued token"],"source_url":"https://tether.to/","source_label":"Publisher site. Not a claim that this URL is the historic PDF.","legacy_pdf_path":"/pdf/Tether-White-Paper.pdf","sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Historic library file Tether-White-Paper.pdf.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Rights uncertain","source_status":"Historic library path","use_status":"Legacy path remains. This page does not describe reserves.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"The historic library files a Tether paper whose index line is fiat currencies on the Bitcoin blockchain.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/tether","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/tether","study_url":null,"last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-PDF-0006","slug":"dash","title":"Dash: A Privacy-Centric Cryptocurrency","authors":"Duffield and Diaz","year":null,"date_label":"Historic library file. Year not re-verified from the bytes.","publisher":"The authors","paper_type":"Historic library file","category":"Digital cash","topics":["Masternodes","Privacy"],"source_url":"https://github.com/dashpay/dash/wiki/Whitepaper","source_label":"Project white paper page","legacy_pdf_path":"/pdf/Dash-WhitepaperV1.pdf","sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Historic library file Dash-WhitepaperV1.pdf.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Rights uncertain","source_status":"Historic library path","use_status":"Legacy path remains. Full text is not republished.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"The library holds a Dash paper by Duffield and Diaz. The index describes a Bitcoin-derived coin with a masternode layer.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/dash","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/dash","study_url":null,"last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-PDF-0007","slug":"peercoin","title":"PPCoin: Peer-to-Peer Crypto-Currency with Proof-of-Stake","authors":"King and Nadal","year":2012,"date_label":"2012, as commonly cited for this title. Not re-read from the file bytes in this build.","publisher":"The authors","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Proof of stake"],"source_url":"https://www.peercoin.net/assets/paper/peercoin-paper.pdf","source_label":"peercoin.net PDF","legacy_pdf_path":"/pdf/peercoin-paper.pdf","sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Historic library file.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Rights uncertain","source_status":"Historic library path","use_status":"Legacy path remains. Full text is not republished.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"King and Nadal's paper is an early proof-of-stake design sitting beside proof of work. The library already names them.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/peercoin","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/peercoin","study_url":null,"last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-PDF-0008","slug":"iota-tangle","title":"The Tangle","authors":"Serguei Popov","year":null,"date_label":"Historic library file. Year not re-verified from the bytes in this build.","publisher":"The author","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["DAG"],"source_url":"https://arxiv.org/pdf/1808.09186","source_label":"A later arXiv note exists; it is not asserted to be this file","legacy_pdf_path":"/pdf/tangle.pdf","sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Historic library file tangle.pdf. Not byte-compared with arXiv.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Rights uncertain","source_status":"Historic library path","use_status":"Legacy path remains. The arXiv link is a related public copy and may be a different version.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"The library holds Popov's Tangle paper: a directed graph of transactions that approve earlier ones, instead of a single chain of blocks.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/iota-tangle","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/iota-tangle","study_url":null,"last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-PDF-0009","slug":"filecoin-2014","title":"Filecoin: A Cryptocurrency Operated File Storage Network","authors":"Not named in this record","year":2014,"date_label":"Described in this library as a 2014 sketch, earlier than the July 2017 paper.","publisher":"Not named in this record","paper_type":"Earlier sketch","category":"Storage and networks","topics":["Storage"],"source_url":"https://www.filecoin.io/assets/documents/filecoin.pdf","source_label":"2017 paper, which this file is not","legacy_pdf_path":"/pdf/filecoin.pdf","sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Historic filecoin.pdf. Distinct from the July 2017 Protocol Labs paper.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Rights uncertain","source_status":"Historic library path only","use_status":"Legacy path remains. Do not cite it as the 2017 paper.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"The historic library's filecoin.pdf is an earlier sketch. The title in the old index is a cryptocurrency-operated file storage network.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/filecoin-2014","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/filecoin-2014","study_url":null,"last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-PDF-0010","slug":"gnosis","title":"Gnosis","authors":"Not named in this record","year":null,"date_label":"Historic library file. Authors and year were not re-verified from the bytes.","publisher":"Gnosis","paper_type":"Historic library file","category":"Markets","topics":["Prediction markets"],"source_url":"https://gnosis.io/","source_label":"Publisher site, not asserted to host this exact file","legacy_pdf_path":"/pdf/gnosis_whitepaper.pdf","sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Historic library file gnosis_whitepaper.pdf.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Rights uncertain","source_status":"Historic library path","use_status":"Legacy path remains. Metadata only beyond the index line.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"The historic library holds a Gnosis white paper. The library note calls it a prediction-market paper.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/gnosis","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/gnosis","study_url":null,"last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-PDF-0011","slug":"sia","title":"Sia: Simple Decentralized Storage","authors":"Vorick and Champine","year":null,"date_label":"Historic library file. Year not re-verified from the bytes.","publisher":"The authors","paper_type":"Historic library file","category":"Storage and networks","topics":["Storage"],"source_url":"https://sia.tech/sia.pdf","source_label":"Publisher PDF","legacy_pdf_path":"/pdf/whitepaper3.pdf","sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Historic library file whitepaper3.pdf. Not byte-compared with the publisher PDF.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Rights uncertain","source_status":"Historic library path","use_status":"Legacy path remains. Full text is not republished.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"The library holds the Sia storage paper by Vorick and Champine. The index subtitle is simple decentralised storage.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/sia","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/sia","study_url":null,"last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-PDF-0012","slug":"storj","title":"Storj: A Peer-to-Peer Cloud Storage Network","authors":"Wilkinson et al.","year":null,"date_label":"Historic library file. The full author list and year were not re-verified.","publisher":"Storj","paper_type":"Historic library file","category":"Storage and networks","topics":["Storage"],"source_url":"https://www.storj.io/storj.pdf","source_label":"Publisher PDF","legacy_pdf_path":"/pdf/storj.pdf","sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Historic library file storj.pdf.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Rights uncertain","source_status":"Historic library path","use_status":"Legacy path remains. Full text is not republished.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"The library holds a Storj paper, indexed as a peer-to-peer cloud storage network, by Wilkinson and co-authors.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/storj","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/storj","study_url":null,"last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-PDF-0013","slug":"kadena-2016","title":"Kadena: The first scalable, high performance private blockchain","authors":"Not named in this record","year":2016,"date_label":"August 2016, from the historic filename. Authors were not re-read.","publisher":"Kadena","paper_type":"Historic library file","category":"Consensus","topics":["Private chain"],"source_url":"https://kadena.com/","source_label":"Publisher site, not asserted to be this file","legacy_pdf_path":"/pdf/Kadena-ConsensusWhitePaper-Aug2016.pdf","sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"August 2016 private-chain note. Not Chainweb.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Rights uncertain","source_status":"Historic library path","use_status":"Legacy path remains. Do not cite it as Chainweb.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"The historic library holds an August 2016 Kadena note. This library already says it is a private-chain document, not Chainweb.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/kadena-2016","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/kadena-2016","study_url":null,"last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0001","slug":"cryptonote","title":"CryptoNote v 2.0","authors":"Nicolas van Saberhagen","year":2013,"date_label":"2013","publisher":"Nicolas van Saberhagen","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://cryptonote.org/whitepaper.pdf","source_label":"cryptonote.org","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2013 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"The public design paper behind unlinkable payments. Monero adopted the construction and then replaced pieces of it. The historic library only has a third-party review of CryptoNote, not this document.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/cryptonote","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/cryptonote","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/cryptonote","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0002","slug":"zerocoin","title":"Zerocoin: Anonymous Distributed E-Cash from Bitcoin","authors":"Ian Miers, Christina Garman, Matthew Green, Aviel D. Rubin","year":2013,"date_label":"2013","publisher":"Ian Miers, Christina Garman, Matthew Green, Aviel D. Rubin","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://zerocoin.org/media/pdf/ZerocoinOakland.pdf","source_label":"Zerocoin Oakland paper","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2013 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"A 2013 proposal to add an anonymity layer on top of Bitcoin by burning a coin into a commitment and later redeeming a different coin with a zero-knowledge proof of membership.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/zerocoin","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/zerocoin","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/zerocoin","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0003","slug":"zerocash","title":"Zerocash: Decentralized Anonymous Payments from Bitcoin","authors":"Eli Ben-Sasson, Alessandro Chiesa, Christina Garman, Matthew Green, Ian Miers, Eran Tromer, Madars Virza","year":2014,"date_label":"2014","publisher":"Eli Ben-Sasson, Alessandro Chiesa, Christina Garman, Matthew Green, Ian Miers, Eran Tromer, Madars Virza","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://zerocash-project.org/media/pdf/zerocash-extended-20140518.pdf","source_label":"Zerocash extended paper","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2014 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"The 2014 paper that showed how a payment ledger can hide sender, receiver and amount, while still letting the network check that coins were not created or double-spent. Zcash is an implementation of this line of work, not a co-author of the paper.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/zerocash","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/zerocash","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/zerocash","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0004","slug":"ring-confidential-transactions","title":"Ring Confidential Transactions","authors":"Shen Noether","year":2016,"date_label":"2016","publisher":"Shen Noether","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://eprint.iacr.org/2015/1098.pdf","source_label":"IACR ePrint 2015/1098","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2016 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"The research note Monero used to hide amounts, not just the signer. It extends ring signatures so a spender can prove a balance inside a ring without publishing the values.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/ring-confidential-transactions","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/ring-confidential-transactions","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/ring-confidential-transactions","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0005","slug":"mimblewimble","title":"Mimblewimble","authors":"Tom Elvis Jedusor","year":2016,"date_label":"2016","publisher":"Tom Elvis Jedusor","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://download.wpsoftware.net/bitcoin/wizardry/mimblewimble.txt","source_label":"Original Mimblewimble note","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2016 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"A short 2016 note on a ledger that stores confidential transactions and can delete spent history. Grin and Beam are later implementations. The note itself is the primary text.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/mimblewimble","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/mimblewimble","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/mimblewimble","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0007","slug":"algorand","title":"ALGORAND: The Efficient and Democratic Ledger","authors":"Silvio Micali","year":2017,"date_label":"2017","publisher":"Silvio Micali","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://arxiv.org/pdf/1607.01341","source_label":"arXiv:1607.01341","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2017 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"Micali's ledger design: a proof-of-stake protocol that elects a small, unpredictable committee to certify each block, and replaces participants so a corruptor cannot find them in time.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/algorand","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/algorand","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/algorand","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0008","slug":"avalanche","title":"Snowflake to Avalanche: A Novel Metastable Consensus Protocol Family","authors":"Team Rocket; later with Maofan Yin, Kevin Sekniqi, Robbert van Renesse and Emin Gün Sirer","year":2018,"date_label":"2018","publisher":"Team Rocket; later with Maofan Yin, Kevin Sekniqi, Robbert van Renesse and Emin Gün Sirer","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://www.avalabs.org/whitepapers","source_label":"Ava Labs white papers","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2018 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"A family of consensus protocols that sample the network repeatedly and tip toward one outcome. The 2018 note was pseudonymous. A later write-up adds named co-authors. Avalanche the network is an implementation, not the sample itself.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/avalanche","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/avalanche","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/avalanche","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0009","slug":"solana","title":"Solana: A new architecture for a high performance blockchain","authors":"Anatoly Yakovenko","year":2018,"date_label":"2018","publisher":"Anatoly Yakovenko","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://solana.com/solana-whitepaper.pdf","source_label":"solana.com white paper","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2018 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"Yakovenko's design note for a ledger that encodes the passage of time as a verifiable hash chain, called Proof of History, so that validators spend less effort agreeing on order.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/solana","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/solana","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/solana","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0010","slug":"tendermint","title":"Tendermint: Consensus without Mining","authors":"Jae Kwon","year":2014,"date_label":"2014","publisher":"Jae Kwon","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/tendermint/tendermint","source_label":"Tendermint repository","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2014 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"A practical Byzantine-fault-tolerant state machine for a known validator set, with instant finality on commit. It became the consensus engine under Cosmos SDK chains. The 2014 note is the origin, not the current CometBFT specification.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/tendermint","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/tendermint","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/tendermint","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0011","slug":"tezos","title":"Tezos — a self-amending crypto-ledger","authors":"L.M. Goodman","year":2014,"date_label":"2014","publisher":"L.M. Goodman","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://tezos.com/whitepaper.pdf","source_label":"tezos.com white paper","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2014 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"Goodman's proposal for a ledger whose protocol can be amended by a defined on-ledger process, with stakeholders who bake blocks and who may delegate.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/tezos","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/tezos","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/tezos","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0012","slug":"hashgraph","title":"The Swirlds Hashgraph Consensus Algorithm: Fair, Fast, Byzantine Fault Tolerance","authors":"Leemon Baird","year":2016,"date_label":"2016","publisher":"Leemon Baird","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://www.swirlds.com/downloads/SWIRLDS-TR-2016-01.pdf","source_label":"Swirlds TR-2016-01","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2016 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"Baird's technical report on hashgraph: gossip about gossip, a virtual vote computed from the graph, and a fairness claim about the order of transactions. Hedera is the later public network that uses the algorithm under a governing council.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/hashgraph","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/hashgraph","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/hashgraph","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0013","slug":"nano","title":"Nano: A Feeless Distributed Cryptocurrency Network","authors":"Colin LeMahieu","year":2017,"date_label":"2017","publisher":"Colin LeMahieu","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://docs.nano.org/whitepaper/english/","source_label":"Nano white paper","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2017 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"LeMahieu's design, first published as RaiBlocks: each account has its own chain, and the account holder is the only one who can append to it. Value moves by a send block on one chain and a receive block on another.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/nano","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/nano","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/nano","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0014","slug":"zilliqa","title":"The ZILLIQA Technical Whitepaper","authors":"The Zilliqa Team","year":2017,"date_label":"2017","publisher":"The Zilliqa Team","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://docs.zilliqa.com/whitepaper.pdf","source_label":"Zilliqa technical white paper","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2017 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"A 2017 design for a sharded chain: a directory service that assigns nodes, shards that process transactions in parallel, and a language proposal aimed at safe-by-construction contracts.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/zilliqa","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/zilliqa","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/zilliqa","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0015","slug":"harmony","title":"Harmony Technical Whitepaper","authors":"Stephen Tse and the Harmony team","year":2019,"date_label":"2019","publisher":"Stephen Tse and the Harmony team","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://harmony.one/whitepaper.pdf","source_label":"harmony.one white paper","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2019 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"A sharded proof-of-stake design that combines a BFT-style consensus inside shards with a randomness scheme for assigning validators, aimed at keeping a single shard from being captured.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/harmony","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/harmony","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/harmony","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0016","slug":"elrond","title":"Elrond: A Highly Scalable Public Blockchain via Adaptive State Sharding","authors":"The Elrond team","year":2019,"date_label":"2019","publisher":"The Elrond team","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://multiversx.com/","source_label":"MultiversX (formerly Elrond)","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2019 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"The 2019 Elrond paper on adaptive state sharding: shards that hold state, a metachain that notarises results, and a secure proof-of-stake selection of validators. The network later rebranded as MultiversX. The paper remains the design document.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/elrond","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/elrond","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/elrond","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0017","slug":"near","title":"The NEAR White Paper","authors":"The NEAR team","year":2019,"date_label":"2019","publisher":"The NEAR team","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://near.org/papers/the-official-near-white-paper/","source_label":"NEAR white paper","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2019 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"NEAR's public design paper: a sharded proof-of-stake chain with a single account model, nightshade-style data availability across chunks, and a stated intent that hiding the shards from application authors is part of the product.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/near","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/near","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/near","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0018","slug":"aptos","title":"The Aptos Blockchain: Safe, Scalable, and Upgradeable Web3 Infrastructure","authors":"Aptos Labs","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Aptos Labs","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://aptosfoundation.org/whitepaper/aptos-whitepaper_en.pdf","source_label":"Aptos white paper","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"Aptos Labs' 2022 paper for a Move-based chain that pipelines dissemination, ordering, execution and certification, and that treats protocol upgrades as a first-class feature rather than a hard-fork event.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/aptos","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/aptos","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/aptos","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0019","slug":"sui","title":"The Sui Smart Contracts Platform","authors":"The Mysten Labs Team","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"The Mysten Labs Team","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://docs.sui.io/paper/sui.pdf","source_label":"Sui platform paper","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"Mysten Labs' platform paper. Assets are Move objects. Operations on objects owned by a single address can finish by consistent broadcast among validators. Shared objects go through consensus. The split is the design.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/sui","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/sui","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/sui","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0020","slug":"diem","title":"The Diem Blockchain","authors":"Diem Association engineering group","year":2020,"date_label":"2020","publisher":"Diem Association engineering group","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://developers.diem.com/docs/technical-papers/the-diem-blockchain-paper/","source_label":"Diem technical paper","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2020 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"The technical paper for the Libra, later Diem, payment chain: a permissioned BFT ledger, a Move language for resources, and a reserve-backed currency proposal. The project was wound down in 2022. The paper still matters because Move, and the account model Aptos and Sui started from, was specified here.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/diem","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/diem","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/diem","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0021","slug":"mina","title":"Coda: Decentralized Cryptocurrency at Scale","authors":"Joseph Bonneau, Izaak Meckler, Vanishree Rao, Evan Shapiro","year":2020,"date_label":"2020","publisher":"Joseph Bonneau, Izaak Meckler, Vanishree Rao, Evan Shapiro","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://eprint.iacr.org/2020/352.pdf","source_label":"IACR ePrint 2020/352","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2020 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"The Coda paper, later the Mina protocol: a chain whose certificate is a constant-size succinct proof, so a client can check the state without replaying history. The project renamed from Coda to Mina. The paper keeps the original name.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/mina","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/mina","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/mina","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0022","slug":"ton","title":"The Open Network","authors":"Nikolai Durov","year":2021,"date_label":"2021","publisher":"Nikolai Durov","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://ton.org/whitepaper.pdf","source_label":"ton.org white paper","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2021 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"Durov's design for a multi-chain system of account-chains gathered into shardchains, with a masterchain that records the others. It began as Telegram's network design and continued as The Open Network after Telegram stepped away from the original launch.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/ton","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/ton","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/ton","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0023","slug":"chainweb","title":"Chainweb: A Proof-of-Work Parallel-Chain Architecture for Massive Throughput","authors":"Will Martino, Monica Quaintance, Stuart Popejoy","year":2018,"date_label":"2018","publisher":"Will Martino, Monica Quaintance, Stuart Popejoy","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://kadena.io/whitepapers","source_label":"Kadena white papers","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2018 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"Kadena's public parallel-chain design. Many proof-of-work chains advance together, and each block commits to peer-chain headers, so a confirmation is a braid rather than a single chain. This is not the 2016 private-chain note already in the historic library.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/chainweb","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/chainweb","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/chainweb","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0024","slug":"eosio","title":"EOS.IO Technical White Paper","authors":"Daniel Larimer and block.one","year":2018,"date_label":"2018","publisher":"Daniel Larimer and block.one","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/EOSIO/Documentation/blob/master/TechnicalWhitePaper.md","source_label":"EOS.IO technical white paper","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2018 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"The 2018 technical paper for EOSIO: delegated proof of stake, named block producers, and an operating-system metaphor for accounts, permissions and resource allocation. It is a design document. It is not a description of later governance fights around any one chain that used the software.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eosio","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eosio","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eosio","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0025","slug":"dfinity","title":"DFINITY Consensus System","authors":"Timo Hanke, Mahnush Movahedi, Dominic Williams","year":2018,"date_label":"2018","publisher":"Timo Hanke, Mahnush Movahedi, Dominic Williams","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://internetcomputer.org/whitepapers","source_label":"Internet Computer white papers","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2018 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"The DFINITY consensus overview: a randomness beacon, a ranking of block proposers, and notarisation so that a chain can come to agreement quickly among a large set. The Internet Computer is the later network built by the DFINITY foundation on this line of research.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/dfinity","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/dfinity","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/dfinity","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0026","slug":"polkadot","title":"Polkadot: Vision for a heterogeneous multi-chain framework","authors":"Gavin Wood","year":2016,"date_label":"2016","publisher":"Gavin Wood","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Interoperability","topics":["Interoperability"],"source_url":"https://github.com/w3f/polkadot-white-paper","source_label":"Web3 Foundation white paper","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2016 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"Wood's 2016 vision paper: a relay chain that provides shared security and a queue of cross-chain messages, with parachains that keep their own state transition. It is a vision paper. The live protocol has a specification of its own.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/polkadot","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/polkadot","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/polkadot","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0027","slug":"cosmos","title":"Cosmos: A Network of Distributed Ledgers","authors":"Jae Kwon and Ethan Buchman","year":2016,"date_label":"2016","publisher":"Jae Kwon and Ethan Buchman","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Interoperability","topics":["Interoperability"],"source_url":"https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos/blob/master/WHITEPAPER.md","source_label":"Cosmos white paper","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2016 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"The Cosmos paper: independent zones running a BFT consensus, connected by a hub, speaking a packet protocol that later became IBC. Unlike Polkadot's shared-security vision, zones here are sovereign. They choose their own validator sets.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/cosmos","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/cosmos","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/cosmos","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0029","slug":"plasma","title":"Plasma: Scalable Autonomous Smart Contracts","authors":"Joseph Poon and Vitalik Buterin","year":2017,"date_label":"2017","publisher":"Joseph Poon and Vitalik Buterin","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://plasma.io/plasma.pdf","source_label":"plasma.io paper","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2017 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"A 2017 construction for trees of child chains whose state commitments are posted to a parent chain, with exits so a user can leave if the child operator misbehaves. It is an ancestor of later rollup and validium designs, not a synonym for them.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/plasma","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/plasma","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/plasma","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0030","slug":"arbitrum","title":"Arbitrum: Scalable, private smart contracts","authors":"Harry Kalodner, Steven Goldfeder, Xiaoqi Chen, S. Matthew Weinberg, Edward W. Felten","year":2018,"date_label":"2018","publisher":"Harry Kalodner, Steven Goldfeder, Xiaoqi Chen, S. Matthew Weinberg, Edward W. Felten","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://www.usenix.org/system/files/conference/usenixsecurity18/sec18-kalodner.pdf","source_label":"USENIX Security 2018","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2018 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"The 2018 USENIX paper on Arbitrum: a verifier that checks a manager's execution of a virtual machine by bisecting disputes, instead of re-executing every instruction. Offchain Labs' later Nitro stack is a descendant, not this paper line for line.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/arbitrum","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/arbitrum","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/arbitrum","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0031","slug":"starks","title":"Scalable, transparent, and post-quantum secure computational integrity","authors":"Eli Ben-Sasson, Iddo Bentov, Yinon Horesh, Michael Riabzev","year":2018,"date_label":"2018","publisher":"Eli Ben-Sasson, Iddo Bentov, Yinon Horesh, Michael Riabzev","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://eprint.iacr.org/2018/046.pdf","source_label":"IACR ePrint 2018/046","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2018 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"The STARK paper: proofs of computational integrity that are succinct, do not need a trusted setup, and are argued to resist quantum attackers on the underlying hashes. StarkWare's later systems, including StarkEx and Starknet, are built on this proof system. They are not identical to it.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/starks","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/starks","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/starks","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0032","slug":"lazyledger","title":"LazyLedger: A Distributed Data Availability Ledger With Client-Side Smart Contracts","authors":"Mustafa Al-Bassam","year":2019,"date_label":"2019","publisher":"Mustafa Al-Bassam","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://arxiv.org/pdf/1905.09274","source_label":"arXiv:1905.09274","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2019 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"Al-Bassam's LazyLedger paper, the research origin of Celestia. The base layer orders and makes data available. It does not execute application transitions. Clients check availability with sampling, and applications execute on their own.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/lazyledger","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/lazyledger","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/lazyledger","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0033","slug":"eigenlayer","title":"EigenLayer: The Restaking Collective","authors":"Eigen Labs","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Eigen Labs","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://docs.eigenlayer.xyz/eigenlayer/overview/whitepaper","source_label":"EigenLayer white paper","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"Eigen Labs' design for letting Ethereum stakers opt in to additional slashing conditions, so new services can rent economic security instead of bootstrapping a new token set from zero.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eigenlayer","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eigenlayer","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eigenlayer","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0034","slug":"matic","title":"Matic Network white paper","authors":"Jaynti Kanani, Sandeep Nailwal, Anurag Arjun","year":2019,"date_label":"2019","publisher":"Jaynti Kanani, Sandeep Nailwal, Anurag Arjun","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://github.com/maticnetwork/whitepaper","source_label":"Matic white paper","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2019 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"The 2019 Matic paper for a Plasma-inspired sidechain with a proof-of-stake checkpoint layer posting to Ethereum. Polygon is the later organisation and product family. This page is about the 2019 document, not about every subsequent Polygon stack.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/matic","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/matic","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/matic","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0035","slug":"uniswap-v2","title":"Uniswap v2 Core","authors":"Hayden Adams, Noah Zinsmeister, Dan Robinson","year":2020,"date_label":"2020","publisher":"Hayden Adams, Noah Zinsmeister, Dan Robinson","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://uniswap.org/whitepaper.pdf","source_label":"Uniswap v2 core paper","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2020 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"The 2020 core paper for Uniswap v2: a constant-product automated market maker, with arbitrary ERC-20 pairs, price accumulators, and a flash-swap callback. It is the clearest short specification of the pool that much of later DeFi either forked or assumed.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/uniswap-v2","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/uniswap-v2","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/uniswap-v2","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0036","slug":"uniswap-v3","title":"Uniswap v3 Core","authors":"Hayden Adams, Noah Zinsmeister, Moody Salem, River Keefer, Dan Robinson","year":2021,"date_label":"2021","publisher":"Hayden Adams, Noah Zinsmeister, Moody Salem, River Keefer, Dan Robinson","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://uniswap.org/whitepaper-v3.pdf","source_label":"Uniswap v3 core paper","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2021 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"The 2021 paper that replaces the uniform reserve curve with concentrated liquidity. A provider chooses a price range. Inside the range their capital acts like a constant-product pool. Outside it, their position is entirely in one asset.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/uniswap-v3","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/uniswap-v3","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/uniswap-v3","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0037","slug":"curve-stableswap","title":"StableSwap — efficient mechanism for Stablecoin liquidity","authors":"Michael Egorov","year":2019,"date_label":"2019","publisher":"Michael Egorov","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://curve.fi/files/stableswap-paper.pdf","source_label":"StableSwap paper","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2019 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"Egorov's 2019 invariant for pools of assets that should trade near parity. The curve is flat around the peg, where most stablecoin trades happen, and bends toward a constant-product tail when the pool is pushed off parity.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/curve-stableswap","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/curve-stableswap","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/curve-stableswap","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0038","slug":"balancer","title":"Balancer: A non-custodial portfolio manager, liquidity provider, and price sensor","authors":"Fernando Martinelli and Nikolai Mushegian","year":2019,"date_label":"2019","publisher":"Fernando Martinelli and Nikolai Mushegian","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://balancer.fi/whitepaper.pdf","source_label":"Balancer white paper","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2019 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"The Balancer paper generalises the two-asset constant-product pool to a weighted basket of several tokens. Traders rebalance the basket. Liquidity providers define target weights. The pool is both an index and a market.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/balancer","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/balancer","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/balancer","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0039","slug":"zero-x","title":"0x: An open protocol for decentralized exchange on the Ethereum blockchain","authors":"Will Warren and Amir Bandeali","year":2017,"date_label":"2017","publisher":"Will Warren and Amir Bandeali","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://github.com/0xProject/whitepaper/blob/master/0x_white_paper.pdf","source_label":"0x white paper","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2017 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"The 2017 0x paper: off-chain signed orders, on-chain settlement, and relayers who host order books without taking custody. It is the reference design for 'the book is off-chain, the swap is on-chain'.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/zero-x","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/zero-x","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/zero-x","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0040","slug":"bancor","title":"Bancor Protocol: Continuous Liquidity and Asynchronous Price Discovery for Tokens through their Smart Contracts","authors":"Eyal Hertzog, Guy Benartzi, Galia Benartzi","year":2017,"date_label":"2017","publisher":"Eyal Hertzog, Guy Benartzi, Galia Benartzi","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://bancor.network/","source_label":"Bancor protocol","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2017 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"The 2017 Bancor paper on smart tokens that hold reserves of other tokens and quote a continuous price from a reserve ratio. It is an early automated-liquidity design, distinct from Uniswap's later constant-product pools.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bancor","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bancor","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bancor","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0041","slug":"thorchain","title":"THORChain: a decentralised liquidity protocol","authors":"The THORChain team","year":2020,"date_label":"2020","publisher":"The THORChain team","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://github.com/thorchain/Resources/tree/master/Whitepapers","source_label":"THORChain white papers","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2020 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"THORChain's design for continuous liquidity pools that cross native chains. Nodes bond capital, observe external chains, and sign outbound transactions as a threshold set. It is a liquidity network, not a wrapped-asset bridge run by a single custodian.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/thorchain","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/thorchain","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/thorchain","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0042","slug":"compound","title":"Compound: The Money Market Protocol","authors":"Robert Leshner and Geoffrey Hayes","year":2019,"date_label":"2019","publisher":"Robert Leshner and Geoffrey Hayes","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Credit and stable value","topics":["Credit and stable value"],"source_url":"https://compound.finance/documents/Compound.Whitepaper.pdf","source_label":"Compound white paper","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2019 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"The 2019 Compound paper: pooled lending markets where suppliers earn a floating rate and borrowers post collateral. Interest rates are a function of utilisation, set in the protocol rather than negotiated bilaterally.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/compound","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/compound","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/compound","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0043","slug":"aave","title":"Aave Protocol white paper","authors":"Aave","year":2020,"date_label":"2020","publisher":"Aave","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Credit and stable value","topics":["Credit and stable value"],"source_url":"https://github.com/aave/aave-protocol/blob/master/docs/Aave_Protocol_Whitepaper_v1_0.pdf","source_label":"Aave protocol white paper v1","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2020 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"Aave's v1 protocol paper: pooled lending with stable and variable rates, and loan features such as rate switching and uncollateralised flash loans inside a single transaction. It sits in the same family as Compound, with a different rate and product surface.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/aave","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/aave","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/aave","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0047","slug":"the-graph","title":"The Graph: a decentralised query protocol for blockchains","authors":"Yaniv Tal, Brandon Ramirez and the Graph team","year":2020,"date_label":"2020","publisher":"Yaniv Tal, Brandon Ramirez and the Graph team","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/graphprotocol/research","source_label":"Graph research papers","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2020 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"The Graph's protocol paper for indexing chain data. Indexers stake on serving a subgraph. Curators signal which subgraphs matter. Consumers pay for queries. The problem is read access, not consensus.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/the-graph","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/the-graph","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/the-graph","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0048","slug":"augur","title":"Augur: a Decentralized Oracle and Prediction Market Platform","authors":"Jack Peterson, Joseph Krug, Micah Zoltu, Austin K. Williams, Stephanie Alexander","year":2018,"date_label":"2018","publisher":"Jack Peterson, Joseph Krug, Micah Zoltu, Austin K. Williams, Stephanie Alexander","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://augur.net/whitepaper.pdf","source_label":"Augur white paper","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2018 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"The Augur paper: prediction markets whose outcomes are reported by token holders, with a dispute ladder that can escalate a contested result. It is both a market design and an oracle design. The historic library already holds Gnosis. Augur is the other canonical public prediction-market paper and was not in that set.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/augur","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/augur","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/augur","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0049","slug":"ocean","title":"Ocean Protocol: A Decentralized Substrate for AI Data and Services","authors":"Trent McConaghy and the Ocean Protocol team","year":2019,"date_label":"2019","publisher":"Trent McConaghy and the Ocean Protocol team","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://oceanprotocol.com/tech-whitepaper.pdf","source_label":"Ocean technical white paper","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2019 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"Ocean's technical paper for publishing, pricing and consuming data services with on-chain access control and off-chain storage. The data does not sit inside the chain. The permission and the payment do.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/ocean","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/ocean","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/ocean","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0050","slug":"bittensor","title":"Bittensor: A Peer-to-Peer Intelligence Market","authors":"Yuma Rao","year":2021,"date_label":"2021","publisher":"Yuma Rao","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://www.bittensor.com/whitepaper","source_label":"Bittensor white paper","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2021 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"Rao's paper for a market in which machine-learning models score each other. Peers rank neighbours, ranks accumulate on a ledger, and an incentive mechanism is specified to resist a naive cartel of mutual high scores. It is a design for pricing intelligence as a commodity, not a benchmark of any particular model.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bittensor","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bittensor","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bittensor","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0051","slug":"singularitynet","title":"SingularityNET: A Decentralized, Open Market and Network for AIs","authors":"Ben Goertzel and the SingularityNET team","year":2017,"date_label":"2017","publisher":"Ben Goertzel and the SingularityNET team","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://public.singularitynet.io/whitepaper.pdf","source_label":"SingularityNET white paper","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2017 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"Goertzel's 2017 proposal for a marketplace where AI services discover, call and pay each other. The paper is broad on purpose: discovery, reputation, inter-agent calls and a tokenised payment rail, sketched as one network.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/singularitynet","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/singularitynet","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/singularitynet","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0053","slug":"arweave","title":"Arweave yellow paper","authors":"Sam Williams and the Arweave team","year":2018,"date_label":"2018","publisher":"Sam Williams and the Arweave team","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Storage and networks","topics":["Storage and networks"],"source_url":"https://www.arweave.org/yellow-paper.pdf","source_label":"Arweave yellow paper","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2018 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"Arweave's protocol paper for permanent storage: miners store a recall block drawn from the history, an endowment is supposed to prepay storage, and the dataset is content-addressed. The yellow paper is the technical document. Marketing pages are not a substitute.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/arweave","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/arweave","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/arweave","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0054","slug":"helium","title":"Helium: A Decentralized Wireless Network","authors":"Amir Haleem, Andrew Allen, Andrew Thompson","year":2018,"date_label":"2018","publisher":"Amir Haleem, Andrew Allen, Andrew Thompson","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Storage and networks","topics":["Storage and networks"],"source_url":"https://whitepaper.helium.com/","source_label":"Helium white paper","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2018 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"The Helium paper for a wireless network built from independently owned hotspots. Coverage is the commodity. Proof-of-coverage is the paper's way of checking that a radio is where it says it is and that it can be heard. Later changes of purpose and token are not this document.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/helium","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/helium","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/helium","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0055","slug":"golem","title":"The Golem Project: crowdfunding white paper","authors":"Golem Factory","year":2016,"date_label":"2016","publisher":"Golem Factory","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Storage and networks","topics":["Storage and networks"],"source_url":"https://golem.network/doc/Golemwhitepaper.pdf","source_label":"Golem white paper","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2016 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"Golem Factory's 2016 paper for a marketplace of spare computer power. Requestors split tasks. Providers run them. A reputation and payment layer is supposed to make the exchange work without a single render farm. The paper is explicit that it was also a crowdfunding document. This page uses the technical design and ignores the sale.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/golem","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/golem","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/golem","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0056","slug":"livepeer","title":"Livepeer: a decentralised live video streaming network","authors":"Doug Petkanics and Eric Tang","year":2017,"date_label":"2017","publisher":"Doug Petkanics and Eric Tang","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Storage and networks","topics":["Storage and networks"],"source_url":"https://github.com/livepeer/wiki/blob/master/WHITEPAPER.md","source_label":"Livepeer white paper","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2017 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"Petkanics and Tang's design for live video transcoding as a protocol job. Broadcasters send a stream. Transcoders stake and compete to encode the renditions viewers actually need. It is a specific media market, which is why it is more concrete than a general 'decentralised compute' essay.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/livepeer","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/livepeer","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/livepeer","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0057","slug":"basic-attention-token","title":"Basic Attention Token: Blockchain Based Digital Advertising","authors":"Brave Software","year":2018,"date_label":"2018","publisher":"Brave Software","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Storage and networks","topics":["Storage and networks"],"source_url":"https://basicattentiontoken.org/BasicAttentionTokenWhitePaper-4.pdf","source_label":"BAT white paper","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2018 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"Brave's 2018 paper for an advertising unit that pays publishers and users from a measured attention event inside the browser, rather than from a chain of third-party trackers. The browser is load-bearing. The token is the unit of account in the paper's payment flow.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/basic-attention-token","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/basic-attention-token","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/basic-attention-token","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0058","slug":"enigma","title":"Enigma: Decentralized Computation Platform with Guaranteed Privacy","authors":"Guy Zyskind, Oz Nathan, Alex Pentland","year":2015,"date_label":"2015","publisher":"Guy Zyskind, Oz Nathan, Alex Pentland","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Confidential compute","topics":["Confidential compute"],"source_url":"https://enigma.co/enigma_full.pdf","source_label":"Enigma paper","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2015 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"The 2015 Enigma paper from MIT: private contracts executed over secret-shared data, so nodes compute without seeing the raw inputs. Secret Network is a later project in this lineage, using different machinery. This page is about the Enigma paper, which the historic library does not hold.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/enigma","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/enigma","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/enigma","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0059","slug":"ekiden","title":"Ekiden: A Platform for Confidentiality-Preserving, Trustworthy, and Performant Smart Contracts","authors":"Raymond Cheng, Fan Zhang, Jernej Kos, Ari Juels, Andrew Miller, Dawn Song and collaborators","year":2019,"date_label":"2019","publisher":"Raymond Cheng, Fan Zhang, Jernej Kos, Ari Juels, Andrew Miller, Dawn Song and collaborators","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Confidential compute","topics":["Confidential compute"],"source_url":"https://arxiv.org/pdf/1804.05141","source_label":"arXiv:1804.05141","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2019 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"The Ekiden paper: smart contracts that execute inside trusted hardware, with the ledger checking attestations rather than re-executing the private code. Oasis Network is the later production system in this line. The paper is the academic statement of the approach.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/ekiden","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/ekiden","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/ekiden","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0060","slug":"pbft","title":"Practical Byzantine Fault Tolerance","authors":"Miguel Castro and Barbara Liskov","year":1999,"date_label":"1999","publisher":"Miguel Castro and Barbara Liskov","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"http://pmg.csail.mit.edu/papers/osdi99.pdf","source_label":"OSDI 1999","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 1999 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"The paper that made a Byzantine quorum practical: a known set of replicas, three phases, and a view change when the leader is useless. Tendermint and HotStuff inherit the shape. Open membership is a different problem.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/pbft","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/pbft","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/pbft","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0061","slug":"bitcoin-ng","title":"Bitcoin-NG: A Scalable Blockchain Protocol","authors":"Ittay Eyal, Adem Ercan Gencer, Emin Gün Sirer and Robbert van Renesse","year":2016,"date_label":"2016","publisher":"Ittay Eyal, Adem Ercan Gencer, Emin Gün Sirer and Robbert van Renesse","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/1510.02037","source_label":"arXiv:1510.02037","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2016 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"Separate the rare proof-of-work election from the frequent publication of transactions. Key blocks choose a leader. That leader's microblocks carry the transactions until the next key block.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bitcoin-ng","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bitcoin-ng","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bitcoin-ng","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0062","slug":"ghost","title":"Secure High-Rate Transaction Processing in Bitcoin","authors":"Yonatan Sompolinsky and Aviv Zohar","year":2015,"date_label":"2015","publisher":"Yonatan Sompolinsky and Aviv Zohar","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://eprint.iacr.org/2013/881","source_label":"ePrint 2013/881","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2015 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"At high block rates the longest chain throws away too much honest work. GHOST follows the heaviest subtree, so blocks off the main tip still count for the fork choice.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/ghost","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/ghost","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/ghost","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0063","slug":"phantom","title":"PHANTOM and GHOSTDAG","authors":"Yonatan Sompolinsky, Shai Wyborski and Aviv Zohar","year":2018,"date_label":"2018","publisher":"Yonatan Sompolinsky, Shai Wyborski and Aviv Zohar","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://eprint.iacr.org/2018/104","source_label":"ePrint 2018/104","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2018 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"A blockDAG protocol that still ends in one linear order. Honest blocks cluster. The parameter k is how wide that cluster may be. Kaspa is a later network in this line, not the paper.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/phantom","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/phantom","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/phantom","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0064","slug":"spectre","title":"SPECTRE: A Fast and Scalable Cryptocurrency Protocol","authors":"Yonatan Sompolinsky, Yoad Lewenberg and Aviv Zohar","year":2016,"date_label":"2016","publisher":"Yonatan Sompolinsky, Yoad Lewenberg and Aviv Zohar","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://eprint.iacr.org/2016/1159","source_label":"ePrint 2016/1159","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2016 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"Blocks form a DAG and vote pairwise on which of two blocks came first. In the common case that vote settles quickly. The paper does not promise a total order of every pair, which is why it is a poor fit for general contracts.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/spectre","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/spectre","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/spectre","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0065","slug":"casper-ffg","title":"Casper the Friendly Finality Gadget","authors":"Vitalik Buterin and Virgil Griffith","year":2017,"date_label":"2017","publisher":"Vitalik Buterin and Virgil Griffith","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/1710.09437","source_label":"arXiv:1710.09437","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2017 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"A finality overlay. Validators cast two rounds of votes so that a chain of checkpoints becomes justified and then final. Equivocation can be slashed. The gadget does not, by itself, propose blocks.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/casper-ffg","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/casper-ffg","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/casper-ffg","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0066","slug":"hotstuff","title":"HotStuff: BFT Consensus in the Lens of Blockchain","authors":"Maofan Yin, Dahlia Malkhi, Michael K. Reiter, Guy Golan Gueta and Ittai Abraham","year":2019,"date_label":"2019","publisher":"Maofan Yin, Dahlia Malkhi, Michael K. Reiter, Guy Golan Gueta and Ittai Abraham","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/1803.05069","source_label":"arXiv:1803.05069","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2019 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"A three-phase BFT protocol whose communication is linear in the number of replicas, because a leader collects a threshold signature instead of everyone talking to everyone. Diem used a variant. The paper is not that network.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/hotstuff","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/hotstuff","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/hotstuff","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0067","slug":"honeybadger","title":"The Honey Badger of BFT Protocols","authors":"Andrew Miller, Yu Xia, Kyle Croman, Elaine Shi and Dawn Song","year":2016,"date_label":"2016","publisher":"Andrew Miller, Yu Xia, Kyle Croman, Elaine Shi and Dawn Song","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://eprint.iacr.org/2016/199","source_label":"ePrint 2016/199","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2016 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"An asynchronous atomic broadcast. It does not wait for a timeout to make progress, and threshold encryption stops a leader from reading a batch and then dropping the transactions it dislikes.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/honeybadger","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/honeybadger","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/honeybadger","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0068","slug":"narwhal-tusk","title":"Narwhal and Tusk: A DAG-based Mempool and Efficient BFT Consensus","authors":"George Danezis, Lefteris Kokoris-Kogias, Alberto Sonnino and Alexander Spiegelman","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"George Danezis, Lefteris Kokoris-Kogias, Alberto Sonnino and Alexander Spiegelman","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2105.11827","source_label":"arXiv:2105.11827","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"Split the mempool from the consensus. Narwhal is a DAG of certified batches. Tusk picks a leader inside that DAG. Later Sui consensus descends from this split. The paper is not a Sui status report.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/narwhal-tusk","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/narwhal-tusk","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/narwhal-tusk","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0069","slug":"snow-white","title":"Snow White: Robustly Reconfigurable Consensus","authors":"Phil Daian, Rafael Pass and Elaine Shi","year":2017,"date_label":"2017","publisher":"Phil Daian, Rafael Pass and Elaine Shi","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://eprint.iacr.org/2016/919","source_label":"ePrint 2016/919","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2017 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"A proof-of-stake design in the sleepy model: honest nodes may be offline, and the set of stakeholders can change. It is an academic predecessor, not Cardano and not Ethereum.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/snow-white","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/snow-white","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/snow-white","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0070","slug":"thunderella","title":"Thunderella: Blockchains with Optimistic Instant Confirmation","authors":"Rafael Pass and Elaine Shi","year":2017,"date_label":"2017","publisher":"Rafael Pass and Elaine Shi","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://eprint.iacr.org/2017/454","source_label":"ePrint 2017/454","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2017 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"A fast path and a slow path. If a large supermajority is honest and an accelerator proposes quickly, transactions confirm at network speed. If not, the protocol falls back to an underlying chain.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/thunderella","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/thunderella","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/thunderella","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0071","slug":"confidential-transactions","title":"Confidential Transactions","authors":"Gregory Maxwell","year":2015,"date_label":"2015","publisher":"Gregory Maxwell","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://elementsproject.org/features/confidential-transactions","source_label":"Elements Project","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2015 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"Hide the amounts on a Bitcoin-style transaction with Pedersen commitments, and use range proofs so a commitment cannot stand for a negative number. The graph of who paid whom stays visible.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/confidential-transactions","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/confidential-transactions","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/confidential-transactions","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0072","slug":"bulletproofs","title":"Bulletproofs: Short Proofs for Confidential Transactions and More","authors":"Benedikt Bünz, Jonathan Bootle, Dan Boneh, Andrew Poelstra, Pieter Wuille and Greg Maxwell","year":2018,"date_label":"2018","publisher":"Benedikt Bünz, Jonathan Bootle, Dan Boneh, Andrew Poelstra, Pieter Wuille and Greg Maxwell","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://eprint.iacr.org/2017/1066","source_label":"ePrint 2017/1066","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2018 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"Range proofs whose size grows logarithmically, with no trusted setup. They made confidential amounts practical to verify. They are not, by themselves, a private payment system.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bulletproofs","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bulletproofs","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bulletproofs","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0073","slug":"groth16","title":"On the Size of Pairing-based Non-interactive Arguments","authors":"Jens Groth","year":2016,"date_label":"2016","publisher":"Jens Groth","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://eprint.iacr.org/2016/260","source_label":"ePrint 2016/260","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2016 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"A pairing-based argument in three group elements. The proofs are tiny and cheap to verify. Each circuit needs its own setup, and a leaked setup can forge proofs.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/groth16","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/groth16","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/groth16","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0074","slug":"plonk","title":"PLONK: Permutations over Lagrange-bases for Oecumenical Noninteractive arguments of Knowledge","authors":"Ariel Gabizon, Zachary J. Williamson and Oana Ciobotaru","year":2019,"date_label":"2019","publisher":"Ariel Gabizon, Zachary J. Williamson and Oana Ciobotaru","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://eprint.iacr.org/2019/953","source_label":"ePrint 2019/953","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2019 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"A SNARK with a universal and updatable structured reference string. One setup can serve many circuits. The proofs are larger than Groth16, and there is still a setup.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/plonk","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/plonk","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/plonk","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0075","slug":"halo","title":"Halo: Recursive Proof Composition without a Trusted Setup","authors":"Sean Bowe, Jack Grigg and Daira Hopwood","year":2019,"date_label":"2019","publisher":"Sean Bowe, Jack Grigg and Daira Hopwood","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://eprint.iacr.org/2019/1021","source_label":"ePrint 2019/1021","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2019 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"Recursion for inner-product arguments, without a structured setup. A proof can attest that another proof was checked. That is how a chain can fold a long history into one object. Halo 2 is a later system.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/halo","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/halo","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/halo","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0076","slug":"zexe","title":"Zexe: Enabling Decentralized Private Computation","authors":"Sean Bowe, Alessandro Chiesa, Matthew Green, Ian Miers, Pratyush Mishra and Howard Wu","year":2020,"date_label":"2020","publisher":"Sean Bowe, Alessandro Chiesa, Matthew Green, Ian Miers, Pratyush Mishra and Howard Wu","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://eprint.iacr.org/2018/962","source_label":"ePrint 2018/962","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2020 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"A model for private computation over records. Each record has a birth predicate and a death predicate. A transaction proves that some records died and others were born, without showing which, or showing the data.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/zexe","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/zexe","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/zexe","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0077","slug":"fraud-and-da","title":"Fraud and Data Availability Proofs","authors":"Mustafa Al-Bassam, Alberto Sonnino and Vitalik Buterin","year":2018,"date_label":"2018","publisher":"Mustafa Al-Bassam, Alberto Sonnino and Vitalik Buterin","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/1809.09044","source_label":"arXiv:1809.09044","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2018 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"Light clients can refuse a block if a fraud proof shows it is invalid, but only if the block's data was actually published. The paper shows how erasure coding and sampling let clients check publication without downloading everything.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/fraud-and-da","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/fraud-and-da","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/fraud-and-da","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0078","slug":"truebit","title":"A scalable verification solution for blockchains","authors":"Jason Teutsch and Christian Reitwiessner","year":2017,"date_label":"2017","publisher":"Jason Teutsch and Christian Reitwiessner","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://people.cs.uchicago.edu/~teutsch/papers/truebit.pdf","source_label":"TrueBit white paper","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2017 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"Pay a solver to run a heavy computation off-chain, and pay a verifier only when they find a lie. An interactive game narrows the lie to one step. A jackpot is there so verifiers show up even when solvers are usually honest.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/truebit","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/truebit","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/truebit","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0079","slug":"kzg","title":"Constant-Size Commitments to Polynomials and Their Applications","authors":"Aniket Kate, Gregory M. Zaverucha and Ian Goldberg","year":2010,"date_label":"2010","publisher":"Aniket Kate, Gregory M. Zaverucha and Ian Goldberg","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://www.iacr.org/archive/asiacrypt2010/6477178/6477178.pdf","source_label":"ASIACRYPT 2010","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2010 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"Commit to a polynomial and later open it at a point, in constant size, with a pairing. The commitment is binding if the setup's trapdoor stays secret. Modern data-availability schemes use this as a brick. The paper is older than those schemes.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/kzg","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/kzg","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/kzg","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0080","slug":"proofs-of-space","title":"Proofs of Space","authors":"Stefan Dziembowski, Sebastian Faust, Vladimir Kolmogorov and Krzysztof Pietrzak","year":2015,"date_label":"2015","publisher":"Stefan Dziembowski, Sebastian Faust, Vladimir Kolmogorov and Krzysztof Pietrzak","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://eprint.iacr.org/2013/796","source_label":"ePrint 2013/796","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2015 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"A proof that a machine reserved storage, not that it burned energy on a puzzle. The verifier checks a small challenge. Chia is a later system that pairs this idea with a verifiable delay. The paper is not Chia.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/proofs-of-space","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/proofs-of-space","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/proofs-of-space","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0081","slug":"vdf","title":"Verifiable Delay Functions","authors":"Dan Boneh, Joseph Bonneau, Benedikt Bünz and Ben Fisch","year":2018,"date_label":"2018","publisher":"Dan Boneh, Joseph Bonneau, Benedikt Bünz and Ben Fisch","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://eprint.iacr.org/2018/601","source_label":"ePrint 2018/601","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2018 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"A function that forces a wait. Evaluating it takes a set number of sequential steps. Checking the result is quick, and the output is unique. Parallel machines do not make the wait much shorter.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/vdf","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/vdf","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/vdf","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0082","slug":"atomic-swaps","title":"Atomic Cross-Chain Swaps","authors":"Maurice Herlihy","year":2018,"date_label":"2018","publisher":"Maurice Herlihy","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Interoperability","topics":["Interoperability"],"source_url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/1801.09515","source_label":"arXiv:1801.09515","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2018 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"A swap across ledgers where either every transfer completes or none does, using hash locks and time locks. There is no custodian in the paper. A party can still walk away and leave the other waiting.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/atomic-swaps","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/atomic-swaps","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/atomic-swaps","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0083","slug":"sprites","title":"Sprites and State Channels","authors":"Andrew Miller, Iddo Bentov, Sandeep Bakshi, Ranjit Kumaresan and Patrick McCorry","year":2017,"date_label":"2017","publisher":"Andrew Miller, Iddo Bentov, Sandeep Bakshi, Ranjit Kumaresan and Patrick McCorry","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Interoperability","topics":["Interoperability"],"source_url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/1702.05812","source_label":"arXiv:1702.05812","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2017 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"State channels whose disputes do not have to hop one channel at a time. A global preimage manager lets a payment resolve in constant time on-chain. Lightning did not adopt this design as its production path.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/sprites","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/sprites","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/sprites","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0084","slug":"ibc","title":"The Interblockchain Communication Protocol","authors":"Christopher Goes and the Cosmos IBC specification","year":2020,"date_label":"2020","publisher":"Christopher Goes and the Cosmos IBC specification","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Interoperability","topics":["Interoperability"],"source_url":"https://github.com/cosmos/ibc","source_label":"Cosmos IBC specification","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2020 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"Two chains verify each other with light clients. A relayer carries packets and proofs. The relayer is not trusted to tell the truth. It is trusted to bother showing up. Security is the security of both chains.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/ibc","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/ibc","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/ibc","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0085","slug":"flash-boys-2","title":"Flash Boys 2.0: Frontrunning, Transaction Reordering, and Consensus Instability in Decentralized Exchanges","authors":"Philip Daian, Steven Goldfeder, Tyler Kell, Yunqi Li, Xueyuan Zhao, Iddo Bentov, Lorenz Breidenbach and Ari Juels","year":2019,"date_label":"2019","publisher":"Philip Daian, Steven Goldfeder, Tyler Kell, Yunqi Li, Xueyuan Zhao, Iddo Bentov, Lorenz Breidenbach and Ari Juels","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/1904.05234","source_label":"arXiv:1904.05234","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2019 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"A measurement paper. Miners and bots reorder and insert transactions around DEX trades. The authors name miner-extractable value and show priority gas auctions. It is not a trading manual, and it is not a claim that any strategy here is available or profitable now.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/flash-boys-2","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/flash-boys-2","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/flash-boys-2","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0086","slug":"uniswap-v4","title":"Uniswap v4 Core","authors":"Hayden Adams and the Uniswap v4 authors","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Hayden Adams and the Uniswap v4 authors","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://github.com/Uniswap/v4-core/blob/main/docs/whitepaper-v4.pdf","source_label":"Uniswap v4 core whitepaper","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"One contract holds many pools. Hooks are code that runs before and after swaps and liquidity changes. Flash accounting settles balances at the end of a lock. A hook can change the rules v3 users took for granted.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/uniswap-v4","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/uniswap-v4","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/uniswap-v4","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0087","slug":"twamm","title":"The Time-Weighted Average Market Maker","authors":"Dave White and Dan Robinson","year":2021,"date_label":"2021","publisher":"Dave White and Dan Robinson","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://www.paradigm.xyz/2021/07/twamm","source_label":"Paradigm, 2021","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2021 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"Execute a large order as if it were split into infinitely many tiny trades across an interval, without paying gas for each piece. Settlement is lazy. This is an order schedule, not a price oracle, despite the nearby acronym TWAP.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/twamm","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/twamm","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/twamm","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0088","slug":"liquity","title":"Liquity: Decentralized Borrowing","authors":"Robert Lauko and Rick Pardoe","year":2021,"date_label":"2021","publisher":"Robert Lauko and Rick Pardoe","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Credit and stable value","topics":["Credit and stable value"],"source_url":"https://github.com/liquity/dev/blob/main/papers/Liquity-Whitepaper.pdf","source_label":"Liquity whitepaper","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2021 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"Borrow a stable-value token against ether, with a one-time fee instead of an interest rate. Troves are liquidated into a stability pool. Redemptions let the token be swapped for the collateral of the weakest trove. The paper does not promise a peg.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/liquity","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/liquity","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/liquity","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0089","slug":"eip-4337","title":"Account Abstraction Using Alt Mempool","authors":"Vitalik Buterin, Yoav Weiss, Dror Tirosh, Shahaf Nacson, Alex Forshtat, Kristof Gazso and Tjaden Hess","year":2021,"date_label":"2021","publisher":"Vitalik Buterin, Yoav Weiss, Dror Tirosh, Shahaf Nacson, Alex Forshtat, Kristof Gazso and Tjaden Hess","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-4337","source_label":"EIP-4337","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2021 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"Smart-contract accounts that propose UserOperations, bundled by a separate mempool, without a change to Ethereum's consensus. Paymasters can sponsor gas. The validation rule lives in the account, which is the point and the risk.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-4337","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-4337","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-4337","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0090","slug":"gasper","title":"Combining GHOST and Casper","authors":"Vitalik Buterin, Diego Hernandez, Thor Kamphefner, Khiem Pham, Zhi Qiao, Danny Ryan, Juhyeok Sin, Ying Wang and Yan X. Zhang","year":2020,"date_label":"2020","publisher":"Vitalik Buterin, Diego Hernandez, Thor Kamphefner, Khiem Pham, Zhi Qiao, Danny Ryan, Juhyeok Sin, Ying Wang and Yan X. Zhang","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2003.03052","source_label":"arXiv:2003.03052","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2020 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"An idealised proof-of-stake protocol that pairs a GHOST-style fork choice with Casper FFG finality. The paper is the design argument for Ethereum's beacon chain, not a status report on a later client or a later outage.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/gasper","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/gasper","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/gasper","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0091","slug":"prism","title":"Deconstructing the Blockchain to Approach Physical Limits","authors":"Vivek Bagaria, Sreeram Kannan, David Tse, Giulia Fanti and Pramod Viswanath","year":2019,"date_label":"2019","publisher":"Vivek Bagaria, Sreeram Kannan, David Tse, Giulia Fanti and Pramod Viswanath","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/1810.08092","source_label":"arXiv:1810.08092","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2019 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"Bitcoin uses one chain for three jobs: proposing transactions, voting on history, and ordering the result. Prism splits those jobs onto separate block trees so throughput can approach network capacity while confirmation tracks propagation delay.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/prism","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/prism","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/prism","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0092","slug":"streamlet","title":"Streamlet: Textbook Streamlined Blockchains","authors":"Benjamin Y. Chan and Elaine Shi","year":2020,"date_label":"2020","publisher":"Benjamin Y. Chan and Elaine Shi","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://eprint.iacr.org/2020/088","source_label":"ePrint 2020/088","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2020 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"A deliberately small consensus protocol: epochs, a leader, a vote, and a rule that three adjacent certified blocks on the same chain become final. The point is to show how little machinery the last few years of BFT designs actually need.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/streamlet","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/streamlet","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/streamlet","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0093","slug":"fruitchains","title":"FruitChains: A Fair Blockchain","authors":"Rafael Pass and Elaine Shi","year":2016,"date_label":"2016","publisher":"Rafael Pass and Elaine Shi","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://eprint.iacr.org/2016/916","source_label":"ePrint 2016/916","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2016 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"Nakamoto consensus can pay a minority coalition more than its share of hash power, which is the selfish-mining observation. FruitChains records transactions in 'fruit' that hang off the chain, and pays out over a window so honest hash power gets roughly honest rewards.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/fruitchains","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/fruitchains","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/fruitchains","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0094","slug":"dag-rider","title":"All You Need is DAG","authors":"Idit Keidar, Eleftherios Kokoris-Kogias, Oded Naor and Alexander Spiegelman","year":2021,"date_label":"2021","publisher":"Idit Keidar, Eleftherios Kokoris-Kogias, Oded Naor and Alexander Spiegelman","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2102.08325","source_label":"arXiv:2102.08325","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2021 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"Replicas reliably broadcast proposals into a round-structured DAG. Once the DAG is local, each replica can read a total order off it without another round of consensus messages. The paper is the asynchronous, optimally resilient version of that idea.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/dag-rider","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/dag-rider","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/dag-rider","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0095","slug":"bullshark","title":"Bullshark: DAG BFT Protocols Made Practical","authors":"Alexander Spiegelman, Neil Giridharan, Alberto Sonnino and Lefteris Kokoris-Kogias","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Alexander Spiegelman, Neil Giridharan, Alberto Sonnino and Lefteris Kokoris-Kogias","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2201.05677","source_label":"arXiv:2201.05677","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"DAG-Rider is built for asynchrony and pays for it on the common path. Bullshark keeps a DAG and a local commit rule, but adds a fast path for when the network is timely. The paper also writes down a simpler partially synchronous version.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bullshark","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bullshark","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bullshark","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0096","slug":"eip-1559","title":"Fee market change for ETH 1.0 chain","authors":"Vitalik Buterin, Eric Conner, Rick Dudley, Matthew Slipper, Ian Norden and Abdelhamid Bakhta","year":2019,"date_label":"2019","publisher":"Vitalik Buterin, Eric Conner, Rick Dudley, Matthew Slipper, Ian Norden and Abdelhamid Bakhta","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-1559","source_label":"EIP-1559","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2019 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"Replace a first-price auction for inclusion with a protocol-quoted base fee that moves with demand, plus a tip to the producer. The base fee is burned. The EIP is a fee-market rule, not a promise that fees will be low.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-1559","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-1559","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-1559","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0097","slug":"fee-mechanism","title":"Transaction Fee Mechanism Design","authors":"Tim Roughgarden","year":2020,"date_label":"2020","publisher":"Tim Roughgarden","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2012.00854","source_label":"arXiv:2012.00854","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2020 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"A mechanism-design reading of blockchain fees. Roughgarden separates what users pay, what miners keep, and what gets burned, and asks which combinations are incentive-compatible for myopic miners. EIP-1559 is the running example, not a price forecast.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/fee-mechanism","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/fee-mechanism","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/fee-mechanism","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0098","slug":"eip-4844","title":"Shard Blob Transactions","authors":"Vitalik Buterin, Dankrad Feist, Diederik Loerakker, George Kadianakis, Matt Garnett, Mofi Taiwo and Ansgar Dietrichs","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Vitalik Buterin, Dankrad Feist, Diederik Loerakker, George Kadianakis, Matt Garnett, Mofi Taiwo and Ansgar Dietrichs","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-4844","source_label":"EIP-4844","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"A new transaction type carries a blob: a large chunk of data that consensus nodes hold briefly and that the execution layer cannot read byte by byte. Rollups are the intended user. The blob is not cheap forever, and it is not the rollup's proof.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-4844","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-4844","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-4844","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0099","slug":"bitvm","title":"BitVM: Compute Anything on Bitcoin","authors":"Robin Linus","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Robin Linus","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://bitvm.org/bitvm.pdf","source_label":"bitvm.org","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"A way to dispute an arbitrary computation between two Bitcoin parties using hashlocks, timelocks and large Taproot trees, without a new opcode. Honest execution stays off-chain. A false claim can be challenged on-chain. It is not a global virtual machine.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bitvm","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bitvm","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bitvm","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0100","slug":"cairo","title":"Cairo – a Turing-complete STARK-friendly CPU architecture","authors":"Lior Goldberg, Shahar Papini and Michael Riabzev","year":2021,"date_label":"2021","publisher":"Lior Goldberg, Shahar Papini and Michael Riabzev","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://eprint.iacr.org/2021/1063","source_label":"ePrint 2021/1063","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2021 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"A CPU whose every instruction was chosen so that a STARK can prove 'this program ran'. You write a program instead of a new set of polynomial equations for each statement. The paper is the machine, not a network's throughput.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/cairo","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/cairo","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/cairo","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0101","slug":"nova","title":"Nova: Recursive Zero-Knowledge Arguments from Folding Schemes","authors":"Abhiram Kothapalli, Srinath Setty and Ioanna Tzialla","year":2021,"date_label":"2021","publisher":"Abhiram Kothapalli, Srinath Setty and Ioanna Tzialla","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://eprint.iacr.org/2021/370","source_label":"ePrint 2021/370","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2021 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"Incrementally verifiable computation without putting a SNARK inside a SNARK. A folding scheme compresses two instances of a computation into one instance of the same size. Repeating that fold is the recursion. The paper is about prover cost, not about a chain.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/nova","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/nova","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/nova","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0102","slug":"marlin","title":"Marlin: Preprocessing zkSNARKs with Universal and Updatable SRS","authors":"Alessandro Chiesa, Yuncong Hu, Mary Maller, Pratyush Mishra, Noah Vesely and Nicholas Ward","year":2019,"date_label":"2019","publisher":"Alessandro Chiesa, Yuncong Hu, Mary Maller, Pratyush Mishra, Noah Vesely and Nicholas Ward","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://eprint.iacr.org/2019/1047","source_label":"ePrint 2019/1047","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2019 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"A preprocessing zkSNARK whose structured reference string is universal and can be updated, rather than baked for one circuit in a ceremony that must be trusted forever. The paper improves on Sonic's costs. It is still a SNARK, with a setup.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/marlin","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/marlin","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/marlin","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0103","slug":"frost","title":"FROST: Flexible Round-Optimized Schnorr Threshold Signatures","authors":"Chelsea Komlo and Ian Goldberg","year":2020,"date_label":"2020","publisher":"Chelsea Komlo and Ian Goldberg","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://eprint.iacr.org/2020/852","source_label":"ePrint 2020/852","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2020 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"A threshold Schnorr signature: any t of n signers can produce one ordinary-looking signature, and fewer than t cannot. The signing protocol is two rounds, or one if nonces were prepared earlier. The paper is the scheme, not a custody vendor.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/frost","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/frost","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/frost","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0104","slug":"musig2","title":"MuSig2: Simple Two-Round Schnorr Multi-Signatures","authors":"Jonas Nick, Tim Ruffing and Yannick Seurin","year":2020,"date_label":"2020","publisher":"Jonas Nick, Tim Ruffing and Yannick Seurin","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://eprint.iacr.org/2020/1261","source_label":"ePrint 2020/1261","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2020 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"n signers, all of them, produce one Schnorr signature that verifies under one aggregated key. Two rounds, and concurrent sessions are in the security claim. This is n-of-n, not a threshold. It is the multi-signature Bitcoin-style schemes reached for.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/musig2","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/musig2","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/musig2","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0105","slug":"taproot","title":"BIP 341: Taproot: SegWit version 1 spending rules","authors":"Pieter Wuille, Jonas Nick and Anthony Towns","year":2020,"date_label":"2020","publisher":"Pieter Wuille, Jonas Nick and Anthony Towns","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0341.mediawiki","source_label":"BIP 341","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2020 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"A Bitcoin spend that can look like a single key, while still hiding a tree of alternative scripts until one of them is used. Schnorr signatures and the key-path spend are the mechanism. Amounts stay public. This is not a privacy coin.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/taproot","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/taproot","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/taproot","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0106","slug":"curve-cryptoswap","title":"Automatic market-making with dynamic peg","authors":"Michael Egorov","year":2021,"date_label":"2021","publisher":"Michael Egorov","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://classic.curve.finance/files/crypto-pools-paper.pdf","source_label":"Curve Finance, 2021","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2021 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"Stableswap concentrates liquidity around a fixed price of one. This paper moves that concentration so it can follow a moving price between volatile assets. The pool reprices itself from its own trades. It does not know the outside world except through those trades.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/curve-cryptoswap","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/curve-cryptoswap","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/curve-cryptoswap","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0107","slug":"curve-stablecoin","title":"Curve stablecoin design","authors":"Michael Egorov","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Michael Egorov","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Credit and stable value","topics":["Credit and stable value"],"source_url":"https://docs.curve.finance/pdf/whitepapers/whitepaper_curve_stablecoin.pdf","source_label":"Curve Finance, 2022","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"A stablecoin lent against volatile collateral, where liquidation is a continuous trade into a special pool rather than a one-shot auction. The paper calls that pool LLAMMA. A peg keeper and a monetary-policy rate sit beside it. Simulations in the paper are not a promise about later losses.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/curve-stablecoin","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/curve-stablecoin","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/curve-stablecoin","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0108","slug":"uma","title":"UMA Data Verification Mechanism: Adding Economic Guarantees to Blockchain Oracles","authors":"UMA","year":2020,"date_label":"2020","publisher":"UMA","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://github.com/UMAprotocol/whitepaper/blob/master/UMA-DVM-oracle-whitepaper.pdf","source_label":"UMA DVM draft v0.2, 2020","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2020 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"An oracle that does not answer every question in real time. It prices the cost of bribing the token holders who would resolve a dispute, and it asks contract designers to keep the profit of a lie below that cost. The draft is an economic argument, not a feed you can read as truth.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/uma","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/uma","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/uma","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0109","slug":"perun","title":"Perun: Virtual Payment Hubs over Cryptocurrencies","authors":"Stefan Dziembowski, Lisa Eckey, Sebastian Faust and Daniel Malinowski","year":2017,"date_label":"2017","publisher":"Stefan Dziembowski, Lisa Eckey, Sebastian Faust and Daniel Malinowski","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://eprint.iacr.org/2017/635","source_label":"ePrint 2017/635","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2017 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"Lightning routes each payment through the intermediaries. Perun asks those intermediaries to set up a virtual channel and then step out of the individual payments. The paper gives the construction for one hub, on a chain that can run the contracts.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/perun","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/perun","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/perun","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0110","slug":"semaphore","title":"Semaphore: Zero-Knowledge Signaling on Ethereum","authors":"Kobi Gurkan, Koh Wei Jie and Barry Whitehat","year":2020,"date_label":"2020","publisher":"Kobi Gurkan, Koh Wei Jie and Barry Whitehat","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://semaphore.pse.dev/whitepaper-v1.pdf","source_label":"Semaphore proposal, 2020","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2020 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"A member of a group proves they are some member, and posts a signal, without showing which member. A nullifier stops the same member signalling twice in the same context. The 2020 proposal is a base layer for voting and similar uses. It is not itself a mixer, and later versions changed the circuits.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/semaphore","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/semaphore","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/semaphore","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0111","slug":"ouroboros-genesis","title":"Ouroboros Genesis: Composable Proof-of-Stake Blockchains with Dynamic Availability","authors":"Christian Badertscher, Peter Gaži, Aggelos Kiayias, Alexander Russell and Vassilis Zikas","year":2018,"date_label":"2018","publisher":"Christian Badertscher, Peter Gaži, Aggelos Kiayias, Alexander Russell and Vassilis Zikas","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://eprint.iacr.org/2018/378","source_label":"ePrint 2018/378","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2018 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"Genesis gives a way to join late, when honest stake may be dynamic, without a checkpoint the protocol itself cannot justify.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/ouroboros-genesis","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/ouroboros-genesis","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/ouroboros-genesis","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0112","slug":"stake-bleeding","title":"Stake-Bleeding Attacks on Proof-of-Stake Blockchains","authors":"Peter Gaži, Aggelos Kiayias and Alexander Russell","year":2018,"date_label":"2018","publisher":"Peter Gaži, Aggelos Kiayias and Alexander Russell","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://eprint.iacr.org/2018/248","source_label":"ePrint 2018/248","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2018 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"The paper shows a long-range style attack in which past stake keeps producing an alternative history unless the protocol makes that history obviously stale.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/stake-bleeding","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/stake-bleeding","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/stake-bleeding","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0113","slug":"bitcoin-async","title":"Analysis of the Blockchain Protocol in Asynchronous Networks","authors":"Rafael Pass, Lior Seeman and abhi shelat","year":2017,"date_label":"2017","publisher":"Rafael Pass, Lior Seeman and abhi shelat","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://eprint.iacr.org/2016/454","source_label":"ePrint 2016/454","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2017 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"The paper analyses Nakamoto consensus when the delay bound is not a clean round, and states how confirmation has to grow with that delay.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bitcoin-async","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bitcoin-async","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bitcoin-async","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0114","slug":"omniledger","title":"OmniLedger: A Secure, Scale-Out, Decentralized Ledger via Sharding","authors":"Eleftherios Kokoris-Kogias, Philipp Jovanovic, Linus Gasser, Nicolas Gailly, Ewa Syta and Bryan Ford","year":2018,"date_label":"2018","publisher":"Eleftherios Kokoris-Kogias, Philipp Jovanovic, Linus Gasser, Nicolas Gailly, Ewa Syta and Bryan Ford","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://eprint.iacr.org/2017/406","source_label":"ePrint 2017/406","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2018 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"OmniLedger reassigns validators to shards, uses a bias-resistant randomness beacon, and atomically commits cross-shard transactions.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/omniledger","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/omniledger","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/omniledger","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0115","slug":"rapidchain","title":"RapidChain: Scaling Blockchain via Full Sharding","authors":"Mahdi Zamani, Mahnush Movahedi and Mariana Raykova","year":2018,"date_label":"2018","publisher":"Mahdi Zamani, Mahnush Movahedi and Mariana Raykova","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://eprint.iacr.org/2018/460","source_label":"ePrint 2018/460","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2018 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"RapidChain shards the ledger completely and uses a committee protocol that tolerates a smaller honest fraction inside a committee than a classical open network.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/rapidchain","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/rapidchain","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/rapidchain","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0116","slug":"compact-multisignatures","title":"Compact Multi-Signatures for Smaller Blockchains","authors":"Dan Boneh, Manu Drijvers and Gregory Neven","year":2018,"date_label":"2018","publisher":"Dan Boneh, Manu Drijvers and Gregory Neven","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://eprint.iacr.org/2018/483","source_label":"ePrint 2018/483","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2018 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"The paper gives a BLS multi-signature that stays compact and blocks the rogue-key attack with a proof of possession of each key.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/compact-multisignatures","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/compact-multisignatures","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/compact-multisignatures","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0117","slug":"zether","title":"Zether: Towards Privacy in a Smart Contract World","authors":"Benedikt Bünz, Shashank Agrawal, Mahdi Zamani and Dan Boneh","year":2020,"date_label":"2020","publisher":"Benedikt Bünz, Shashank Agrawal, Mahdi Zamani and Dan Boneh","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://eprint.iacr.org/2019/191","source_label":"ePrint 2019/191","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2020 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"Zether is a contract for confidential transfers and confidential anonymous transfers, with balances as commitments and a proof that the spend is well formed.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/zether","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/zether","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/zether","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0118","slug":"bootle-ipa","title":"Efficient Zero-Knowledge Arguments for Arithmetic Circuits in the Discrete Log Setting","authors":"Jonathan Bootle, Andrea Cerulli, Pyrros Chaidos, Jens Groth and Christophe Petit","year":2016,"date_label":"2016","publisher":"Jonathan Bootle, Andrea Cerulli, Pyrros Chaidos, Jens Groth and Christophe Petit","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://eprint.iacr.org/2016/263","source_label":"ePrint 2016/263","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2016 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"The paper compresses an inner-product argument so a circuit proof can be logarithmic without a trusted setup, in the discrete-log model.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bootle-ipa","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bootle-ipa","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bootle-ipa","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0119","slug":"aurora","title":"Aurora: Transparent Succinct Arguments for R1CS","authors":"Eli Ben-Sasson, Alessandro Chiesa, Michael Riabzev, Nicholas Spooner, Madars Virza and Nicholas P. Ward","year":2019,"date_label":"2019","publisher":"Eli Ben-Sasson, Alessandro Chiesa, Michael Riabzev, Nicholas Spooner, Madars Virza and Nicholas P. Ward","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://eprint.iacr.org/2018/828","source_label":"ePrint 2018/828","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2019 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"Aurora proves rank-one constraint systems with a transparent setup, using a FRI-style proximity test rather than a pairing.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/aurora","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/aurora","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/aurora","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0120","slug":"spartan","title":"Spartan: Efficient and General-Purpose zkSNARKs without Trusted Setup","authors":"Srinath Setty","year":2020,"date_label":"2020","publisher":"Srinath Setty","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://eprint.iacr.org/2019/550","source_label":"ePrint 2019/550","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2020 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"Spartan encodes the circuit as a sparse matrix and uses a polynomial commitment so the prover's work tracks the number of constraints more tightly than a dense encoding.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/spartan","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/spartan","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/spartan","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0121","slug":"hyperplonk","title":"HyperPlonk: Plonk with Linear-Time Prover and High-Degree Custom Gates","authors":"Binyi Chen, Benedikt Bünz, Dan Boneh and Zhenfei Zhang","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Binyi Chen, Benedikt Bünz, Dan Boneh and Zhenfei Zhang","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://eprint.iacr.org/2022/1355","source_label":"ePrint 2022/1355","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"HyperPlonk replaces that transform with a sumcheck so the prover is linear in the number of gates, and it allows higher-degree custom gates.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/hyperplonk","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/hyperplonk","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/hyperplonk","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0122","slug":"supernova","title":"SuperNova: Proving Universal Machine Executions without Universal Circuits","authors":"Abhiram Kothapalli and Srinath Setty","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Abhiram Kothapalli and Srinath Setty","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://eprint.iacr.org/2022/1758","source_label":"ePrint 2022/1758","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"SuperNova folds a universal machine by switching among circuits without a universal circuit that contains every instruction.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/supernova","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/supernova","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/supernova","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0123","slug":"hypernova","title":"HyperNova: Recursive Arguments for Customizable Constraint Systems","authors":"Abhiram Kothapalli and Srinath Setty","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Abhiram Kothapalli and Srinath Setty","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://eprint.iacr.org/2023/573","source_label":"ePrint 2023/573","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"HyperNova generalises folding to customisable constraint systems so a recursive proof can follow the arithmetisation the circuit actually uses.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/hypernova","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/hypernova","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/hypernova","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0124","slug":"crypsinous","title":"Ouroboros Crypsinous: Privacy-Preserving Proof-of-Stake","authors":"Thomas Kerber, Aggelos Kiayias, Markulf Kohlweiss and Vassilis Zikas","year":2019,"date_label":"2019","publisher":"Thomas Kerber, Aggelos Kiayias, Markulf Kohlweiss and Vassilis Zikas","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://eprint.iacr.org/2018/1132","source_label":"ePrint 2018/1132","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2019 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"Crypsinous combines a stake lottery with a private transaction ledger so the leader proof and the transfers do not reveal the stake and the amounts in the way a public chain does.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/crypsinous","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/crypsinous","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/crypsinous","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0125","slug":"powers-of-tau","title":"Scalable Multi-party Computation for zk-SNARK Parameters","authors":"Sean Bowe, Ariel Gabizon and Ian Miers","year":2017,"date_label":"2017","publisher":"Sean Bowe, Ariel Gabizon and Ian Miers","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://eprint.iacr.org/2017/1050","source_label":"ePrint 2017/1050","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2017 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"Powers of Tau is a multi-party computation that builds the structured reference string so that if one participant deletes their randomness, the trapdoor is gone.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/powers-of-tau","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/powers-of-tau","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/powers-of-tau","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0126","slug":"algorand-vault","title":"Vault: Fast Bootstrapping for the Algorand Cryptocurrency","authors":"Derek Leung, Adam Suhl, Yossi Gilad and Nickolai Zeldovich","year":2019,"date_label":"2019","publisher":"Derek Leung, Adam Suhl, Yossi Gilad and Nickolai Zeldovich","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://eprint.iacr.org/2018/269","source_label":"ePrint 2018/269","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2019 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"Vault compresses Algorand's state and the proofs a client needs so a bootstrapping node does not replay the entire history.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/algorand-vault","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/algorand-vault","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/algorand-vault","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0127","slug":"stubborn-mining","title":"Stubborn Mining: Generalizing Selfish Mining and Combining with an Eclipse Attack","authors":"Kartik Nayak, Srijan Kumar, Andrew Miller and Elaine Shi","year":2016,"date_label":"2016","publisher":"Kartik Nayak, Srijan Kumar, Andrew Miller and Elaine Shi","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://eprint.iacr.org/2015/796","source_label":"ePrint 2015/796","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2016 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"The paper generalises the withholding strategies and shows they compose with an eclipse attack that starves a node of honest blocks.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/stubborn-mining","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/stubborn-mining","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/stubborn-mining","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0128","slug":"pow-measurement","title":"On the Security and Performance of Proof of Work Blockchains","authors":"Arthur Gervais, Ghassan O. Karame, Karl Wüst, Vasileios Glykantzis, Hubert Ritzdorf and Srdjan Capkun","year":2016,"date_label":"2016","publisher":"Arthur Gervais, Ghassan O. Karame, Karl Wüst, Vasileios Glykantzis, Hubert Ritzdorf and Srdjan Capkun","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://eprint.iacr.org/2016/555","source_label":"ePrint 2016/555","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2016 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"The paper builds a quantitative model of stale blocks, double-spends and selfish mining across proof-of-work parameters.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/pow-measurement","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/pow-measurement","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/pow-measurement","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0129","slug":"dumbo","title":"Dumbo: Faster Asynchronous BFT Protocols","authors":"Bingyong Guo, Zhenliang Lu, Qiang Tang, Jing Xu and Zhenfeng Zhang","year":2020,"date_label":"2020","publisher":"Bingyong Guo, Zhenliang Lu, Qiang Tang, Jing Xu and Zhenfeng Zhang","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://eprint.iacr.org/2020/841","source_label":"ePrint 2020/841","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2020 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"Dumbo reduces the cost of the asynchronous path by improving the reliable broadcast and the binary agreement that HoneyBadger-style protocols stack together.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/dumbo","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/dumbo","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/dumbo","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0130","slug":"sok-bitcoin","title":"Research Perspectives and Challenges for Bitcoin and Cryptocurrencies","authors":"Joseph Bonneau, Andrew Miller, Jeremy Clark, Arvind Narayanan, Joshua A. Kroll and Edward W. Felten","year":2015,"date_label":"2015","publisher":"Joseph Bonneau, Andrew Miller, Jeremy Clark, Arvind Narayanan, Joshua A. Kroll and Edward W. Felten","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://eprint.iacr.org/2015/261","source_label":"ePrint 2015/261","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2015 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"This systematisation names the stability and consensus questions, the client problems, and the open research problems as of its date. It is a map, not a new protocol.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/sok-bitcoin","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/sok-bitcoin","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/sok-bitcoin","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0131","slug":"spacemint","title":"SpaceMint: A Cryptocurrency Based on Proofs of Space","authors":"Sunoo Park, Albert Kwon, Georg Fuchsbauer, Peter Gaži, Joël Alwen and Krzysztof Pietrzak","year":2015,"date_label":"2015","publisher":"Sunoo Park, Albert Kwon, Georg Fuchsbauer, Peter Gaži, Joël Alwen and Krzysztof Pietrzak","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://eprint.iacr.org/2015/528","source_label":"ePrint 2015/528","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2015 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"SpaceMint elects a leader from plots of stored data. The quality of the stored answer, not a hash grind at block time, decides who may extend the chain.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/spacemint","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/spacemint","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/spacemint","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0132","slug":"bitcoin-beacon","title":"On Bitcoin as a Public Randomness Source","authors":"Joseph Bonneau, Jeremy Clark and Steven Goldfeder","year":2015,"date_label":"2015","publisher":"Joseph Bonneau, Jeremy Clark and Steven Goldfeder","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://eprint.iacr.org/2015/1015","source_label":"ePrint 2015/1015","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2015 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"The paper asks when a proof-of-work block hash is a safe public beacon, and how a miner can bias it by withholding or grinding.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bitcoin-beacon","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bitcoin-beacon","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bitcoin-beacon","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0133","slug":"bitcoin-ledger","title":"Bitcoin as a Transaction Ledger: A Composable Treatment","authors":"Christian Badertscher, Ueli Maurer, Daniel Tschudi and Vassilis Zikas","year":2017,"date_label":"2017","publisher":"Christian Badertscher, Ueli Maurer, Daniel Tschudi and Vassilis Zikas","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://eprint.iacr.org/2017/149","source_label":"ePrint 2017/149","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2017 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"The paper gives a composable ledger functionality and shows that a bitcoin-like protocol realises it under stated assumptions.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bitcoin-ledger","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bitcoin-ledger","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bitcoin-ledger","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0134","slug":"ohie","title":"OHIE: Blockchain Scaling Made Simple","authors":"Haifeng Yu, Ivica Nikolić, Ruomu Hou, Prateek Saxena and Joseph Bonneau","year":2020,"date_label":"2020","publisher":"Haifeng Yu, Ivica Nikolić, Ruomu Hou, Prateek Saxena and Joseph Bonneau","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/1811.12628","source_label":"arXiv:1811.12628","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2020 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"Run many parallel Nakamoto chains. A block is assigned to a chain by its hash. The safety argument stays close to bitcoin's, and the throughput is the sum.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/ohie","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/ohie","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/ohie","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0135","slug":"chainspace","title":"Chainspace: A Sharded Smart Contracts Platform","authors":"Mustafa Al-Bassam, Alberto Sonnino, Shehar Bano, Dave Hrycyszyn and George Danezis","year":2017,"date_label":"2017","publisher":"Mustafa Al-Bassam, Alberto Sonnino, Shehar Bano, Dave Hrycyszyn and George Danezis","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/1708.03778","source_label":"arXiv:1708.03778","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2017 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"Chainspace shards objects, and a transaction names the objects it will read and write so the shards involved can run a distributed commit.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/chainspace","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/chainspace","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/chainspace","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0136","slug":"shoal","title":"Shoal: Improving DAG-BFT Latency and Robustness","authors":"Alexander Spiegelman, Balaji Arun, Rati Gelashvili and Zekun Li","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Alexander Spiegelman, Balaji Arun, Rati Gelashvili and Zekun Li","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.03058","source_label":"arXiv:2306.03058","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"Shoal pipelines the DAG so a block can commit faster in the good case, and it uses a reputation idea so slow leaders stop dominating the schedule.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/shoal","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/shoal","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/shoal","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0137","slug":"mysticeti","title":"Mysticeti: Reaching the Limits of Latency with Uncertified DAGs","authors":"Kushal Babel, Andrey Chursin, George Danezis, Anastasios Kichidis, Lefteris Kokoris-Kogias, Arun Koshy, Alberto Sonnino and Mingwei Tian","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Kushal Babel, Andrey Chursin, George Danezis, Anastasios Kichidis, Lefteris Kokoris-Kogias, Arun Koshy, Alberto Sonnino and Mingwei Tian","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.14821","source_label":"arXiv:2310.14821","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"Mysticeti commits from an uncertified DAG: blocks are signed by their authors and the commit rule does not require a certificate first.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/mysticeti","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/mysticeti","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/mysticeti","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0138","slug":"cordial-miners","title":"Cordial Miners: Fast and Efficient Consensus for Every Eventuality","authors":"Idit Keidar, Oded Naor, Ouri Poupko and Ehud Shapiro","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Idit Keidar, Oded Naor, Ouri Poupko and Ehud Shapiro","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2205.09174","source_label":"arXiv:2205.09174","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"Cordial Miners build a DAG with a simple cordial rule for including other miners' blocks, aiming at responsiveness without the certificate tax of the earlier DAG BFTs.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/cordial-miners","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/cordial-miners","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/cordial-miners","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0139","slug":"hashcash","title":"Hashcash: A Denial of Service Counter-Measure","authors":"Adam Back","year":2002,"date_label":"2002","publisher":"Adam Back","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"http://www.hashcash.org/papers/hashcash.pdf","source_label":"hashcash.org","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2002 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"The client finds a partial hash collision. The server checks it cheaply. The stamp is the cost.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/hashcash","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/hashcash","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/hashcash","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0140","slug":"b-money","title":"b-money","authors":"Wei Dai","year":1998,"date_label":"1998","publisher":"Wei Dai","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Credit and stable value","topics":["Credit and stable value"],"source_url":"http://www.weidai.com/bmoney.txt","source_label":"weidai.com","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 1998 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"Participants broadcast contract offers. Money is created by solving a computational problem, and a collective bookkeeping system tracks balances. A second variant uses a subset of servers.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/b-money","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/b-money","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/b-money","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0141","slug":"lamport-clocks","title":"Time, Clocks, and the Ordering of Events in a Distributed System","authors":"Leslie Lamport","year":1978,"date_label":"1978","publisher":"Leslie Lamport","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://lamport.azurewebsites.net/pubs/time-clocks.pdf","source_label":"Lamport","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 1978 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"Lamport clocks number events so that if A happened before B, A's number is smaller. The converse is not true. That one direction is the whole idea.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/lamport-clocks","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/lamport-clocks","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/lamport-clocks","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0142","slug":"bitcoin-nakamoto","title":"Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System","authors":"Satoshi Nakamoto","year":2008,"date_label":"2008","publisher":"Satoshi Nakamoto","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf","source_label":"bitcoin.org","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2008 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"Publish every spend to a peer network. Let proof-of-work order the history. The longest chain of work is the ledger honest nodes extend. The first spend of a coin in that chain is the one that counts.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bitcoin-nakamoto","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bitcoin-nakamoto","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bitcoin-nakamoto","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0143","slug":"paxos","title":"The Part-Time Parliament","authors":"Leslie Lamport","year":1998,"date_label":"1998","publisher":"Leslie Lamport","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://lamport.azurewebsites.net/pubs/lamport-paxos.pdf","source_label":"Lamport","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 1998 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"A value is chosen only when a majority has accepted it in some ballot, and every higher ballot must honour a value that majority might already have chosen.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/paxos","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/paxos","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/paxos","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0144","slug":"paxos-made-simple","title":"Paxos Made Simple","authors":"Leslie Lamport","year":2001,"date_label":"2001","publisher":"Leslie Lamport","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://lamport.azurewebsites.net/pubs/paxos-simple.pdf","source_label":"Lamport","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2001 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"The same two-phase majority protocol, written as pseudocode: prepare, accept, and learn.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/paxos-made-simple","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/paxos-made-simple","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/paxos-made-simple","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0145","slug":"raft","title":"In Search of an Understandable Consensus Algorithm","authors":"Diego Ongaro and John Ousterhout","year":2014,"date_label":"2014","publisher":"Diego Ongaro and John Ousterhout","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://raft.github.io/raft.pdf","source_label":"Raft paper","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2014 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"A strong leader accepts entries, replicates them in order, and commits only when a majority of the current term has stored them.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/raft","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/raft","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/raft","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0146","slug":"byzantine-generals","title":"The Byzantine Generals Problem","authors":"Leslie Lamport, Robert Shostak and Marshall Pease","year":1982,"date_label":"1982","publisher":"Leslie Lamport, Robert Shostak and Marshall Pease","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://lamport.azurewebsites.net/pubs/byz.pdf","source_label":"Lamport, Shostak, Pease","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 1982 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"With oral messages, more than two thirds must be loyal. With signed messages, any number of traitors can be tolerated if a loyal commander is heard.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/byzantine-generals","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/byzantine-generals","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/byzantine-generals","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0147","slug":"partial-synchrony","title":"Consensus in the Presence of Partial Synchrony","authors":"Cynthia Dwork, Nancy Lynch and Larry Stockmeyer","year":1988,"date_label":"1988","publisher":"Cynthia Dwork, Nancy Lynch and Larry Stockmeyer","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://groups.csail.mit.edu/tds/papers/Lynch/jacm88.pdf","source_label":"Journal of the ACM","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 1988 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"Safety can hold with no timing assumption. Liveness can wait for a period, after some unknown instant, when messages arrive within a bound.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/partial-synchrony","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/partial-synchrony","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/partial-synchrony","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0148","slug":"flp","title":"Impossibility of Distributed Consensus with One Faulty Process","authors":"Michael J. Fischer, Nancy A. Lynch and Michael S. Paterson","year":1985,"date_label":"1985","publisher":"Michael J. Fischer, Nancy A. Lynch and Michael S. Paterson","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://groups.csail.mit.edu/tds/papers/Lynch/jacm85.pdf","source_label":"Journal of the ACM","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 1985 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"No deterministic protocol does all three. Any protocol that is always safe has an execution that never decides.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/flp","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/flp","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/flp","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0149","slug":"bitcoin-backbone","title":"The Bitcoin Backbone Protocol","authors":"Juan Garay, Aggelos Kiayias and Nikos Leonardos","year":2015,"date_label":"2015","publisher":"Juan Garay, Aggelos Kiayias and Nikos Leonardos","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://eprint.iacr.org/2014/765","source_label":"ePrint 2014/765","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2015 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"Common prefix, chain quality and chain growth, under a synchronous network and an honest majority of hash power.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bitcoin-backbone","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bitcoin-backbone","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bitcoin-backbone","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0150","slug":"sleepy-consensus","title":"The Sleepy Model of Consensus","authors":"Rafael Pass and Elaine Shi","year":2017,"date_label":"2017","publisher":"Rafael Pass and Elaine Shi","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://eprint.iacr.org/2016/918","source_label":"ePrint 2016/918","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2017 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"Only awake nodes participate. A public randomness beacon picks a leader from the awake stake. Sleeping nodes do not have to be online to keep their stake safe.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/sleepy-consensus","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/sleepy-consensus","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/sleepy-consensus","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0151","slug":"ouroboros-praos","title":"Ouroboros Praos: An Adaptively-Secure, Semi-synchronous Proof-of-Stake Protocol","authors":"Bernardo David, Peter Gaži, Aggelos Kiayias and Alexander Russell","year":2018,"date_label":"2018","publisher":"Bernardo David, Peter Gaži, Aggelos Kiayias and Alexander Russell","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://eprint.iacr.org/2017/573","source_label":"ePrint 2017/573","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2018 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"Praos hides who the slot leader is until they speak, and it tolerates a semi-synchronous delay, so an adaptive adversary cannot target the leader in advance.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/ouroboros-praos","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/ouroboros-praos","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/ouroboros-praos","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0152","slug":"selfish-mining","title":"Majority Is Not Enough: Bitcoin Mining Is Vulnerable","authors":"Ittay Eyal and Emin Gün Sirer","year":2014,"date_label":"2014","publisher":"Ittay Eyal and Emin Gün Sirer","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://arxiv.org/pdf/1311.0243","source_label":"arXiv:1311.0243","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2014 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"A miner who withholds blocks and releases them to waste honest work can earn more than their share, even below 50 percent, under the paper's propagation assumptions.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/selfish-mining","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/selfish-mining","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/selfish-mining","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0153","slug":"eclipse-attacks","title":"Eclipse Attacks on Bitcoin's Peer-to-Peer Network","authors":"Ethan Heilman, Alison Kendler, Aviv Zohar and Sharon Goldberg","year":2015,"date_label":"2015","publisher":"Ethan Heilman, Alison Kendler, Aviv Zohar and Sharon Goldberg","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://eprint.iacr.org/2015/263","source_label":"ePrint 2015/263","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2015 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"Fill a node's peer table with attacker addresses so every connection the node opens lands on the attacker. The node can then be fed a private view of blocks and transactions.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eclipse-attacks","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eclipse-attacks","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eclipse-attacks","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0154","slug":"flexible-paxos","title":"Flexible Paxos: Quorum Intersection Revisited","authors":"Heidi Howard, Dahlia Malkhi and Alexander Spiegelman","year":2016,"date_label":"2016","publisher":"Heidi Howard, Dahlia Malkhi and Alexander Spiegelman","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://arxiv.org/pdf/1608.06696","source_label":"arXiv:1608.06696","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2016 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"Only quorums from different phases have to intersect. A phase-1 quorum and a phase-2 quorum must overlap. Two phase-2 quorums need not.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/flexible-paxos","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/flexible-paxos","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/flexible-paxos","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0155","slug":"epaxos","title":"There Is More Consensus in Egalitarian Parliaments","authors":"Iulian Moraru, David G. Andersen and Michael Kaminsky","year":2013,"date_label":"2013","publisher":"Iulian Moraru, David G. Andersen and Michael Kaminsky","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://www.pdl.cmu.edu/PDL-FTP/associated/CMU-PDL-13-109.pdf","source_label":"CMU PDL","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2013 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"Any replica can propose. Commands that do not conflict commit in one round. Commands that conflict take a second round that records the dependency.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/epaxos","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/epaxos","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/epaxos","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0156","slug":"conflux","title":"Scaling Nakamoto Consensus to Thousands of Transactions per Second","authors":"Chenxing Li, Peilun Li, Dong Zhou, Wei Xu, Fan Long and Andrew Chi-Chih Yao","year":2018,"date_label":"2018","publisher":"Chenxing Li, Peilun Li, Dong Zhou, Wei Xu, Fan Long and Andrew Chi-Chih Yao","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://arxiv.org/pdf/1805.03870","source_label":"arXiv:1805.03870","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2018 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"Keep every block in a directed acyclic graph. A pivot chain picks a total order. Honest blocks that lost the race still contribute security and transactions.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/conflux","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/conflux","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/conflux","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0157","slug":"jolteon-ditto","title":"Jolteon and Ditto: Network-Adaptive Efficient Consensus with Asynchronous Fallback","authors":"Rati Gelashvili, Lefteris Kokoris-Kogias, Alberto Sonnino, Alexander Spiegelman and Zhuolun Xiang","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Rati Gelashvili, Lefteris Kokoris-Kogias, Alberto Sonnino, Alexander Spiegelman and Zhuolun Xiang","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://arxiv.org/pdf/2106.10362","source_label":"arXiv:2106.10362","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"Jolteon takes two rounds in the happy path. Ditto keeps that path and falls back to an asynchronous protocol when the network or the leader misbehaves.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/jolteon-ditto","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/jolteon-ditto","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/jolteon-ditto","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0158","slug":"sbft","title":"SBFT: A Scalable and Decentralized Trust Infrastructure for Blockchains","authors":"Guy Golan Gueta, Ittai Abraham, Shelly Grossman, Dahlia Malkhi, Benny Pinkas, Michael K. Reiter, Dragos-Adrian Seredinschi, Orr Tamir and Alin Tomescu","year":2019,"date_label":"2019","publisher":"Guy Golan Gueta, Ittai Abraham, Shelly Grossman, Dahlia Malkhi, Benny Pinkas, Michael K. Reiter, Dragos-Adrian Seredinschi, Orr Tamir and Alin Tomescu","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://arxiv.org/pdf/1804.01626","source_label":"arXiv:1804.01626","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2019 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"Collectors aggregate signatures into one proof. A client and the replicas see a constant number of messages rather than a quadratic flood, under the paper's collector assumption.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/sbft","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/sbft","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/sbft","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0159","slug":"zyzzyva","title":"Zyzzyva: Speculative Byzantine Fault Tolerance","authors":"Ramakrishna Kotla, Lorenzo Alvisi, Mike Dahlin, Allen Clement and Edmund Wong","year":2007,"date_label":"2007","publisher":"Ramakrishna Kotla, Lorenzo Alvisi, Mike Dahlin, Allen Clement and Edmund Wong","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://www.cs.utexas.edu/~lorenzo/papers/kotla07zyzzyva.pdf","source_label":"SOSP 2007","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2007 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"Replicas execute the leader's request speculatively and reply. If every replica agrees, the client is done. A disagreement starts a slower path that looks more like PBFT.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/zyzzyva","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/zyzzyva","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/zyzzyva","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0160","slug":"weak-subjectivity","title":"Proof of Stake: How I Learned to Love Weak Subjectivity","authors":"Vitalik Buterin","year":2014,"date_label":"2014","publisher":"Vitalik Buterin","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://blog.ethereum.org/2014/11/25/proof-stake-learned-love-weak-subjectivity","source_label":"Ethereum blog, 2014","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2014 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"A node that has been offline longer than a known window must take a recent checkpoint from a source it already trusts. Inside the window, the protocol can defend itself.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/weak-subjectivity","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/weak-subjectivity","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/weak-subjectivity","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0161","slug":"raft-membership","title":"Consensus: Bridging Theory and Practice","authors":"Diego Ongaro","year":2014,"date_label":"2014","publisher":"Diego Ongaro","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://github.com/ongardie/dissertation","source_label":"Ongaro dissertation","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2014 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"Membership changes one server at a time, or through joint consensus, so there is never a moment when two disjoint majorities can both commit.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/raft-membership","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/raft-membership","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/raft-membership","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0162","slug":"bitcoin-network","title":"Information Propagation in the Bitcoin Network","authors":"Christian Decker and Roger Wattenhofer","year":2013,"date_label":"2013","publisher":"Christian Decker and Roger Wattenhofer","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://www.gsd.inesc-id.pt/~ler/docencia/rcs1314/papers/P2P2013_041.pdf","source_label":"IEEE P2P 2013","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2013 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"Measure how Bitcoin announcements travel. The median time and the long tail are what set a safe block interval.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bitcoin-network","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bitcoin-network","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bitcoin-network","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0163","slug":"verifier-dilemma","title":"Demystifying Incentives in the Consensus Computer","authors":"Loi Luu, Jason Teutsch, Raghav Kulkarni and Prateek Saxena","year":2015,"date_label":"2015","publisher":"Loi Luu, Jason Teutsch, Raghav Kulkarni and Prateek Saxena","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://eprint.iacr.org/2015/702","source_label":"ePrint 2015/702","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2015 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"If checking a block is expensive and the chance it is invalid is small, the equilibrium is not to check. The paper names that gap the verifier's dilemma.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/verifier-dilemma","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/verifier-dilemma","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/verifier-dilemma","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0164","slug":"merged-mining","title":"Merged Mining: Curse or Cure?","authors":"Aljosha Judmayer, Alexei Zamyatin, Nicholas Stifter, Artemios G. Voyiatzis and Edgar Weippl","year":2017,"date_label":"2017","publisher":"Aljosha Judmayer, Alexei Zamyatin, Nicholas Stifter, Artemios G. Voyiatzis and Edgar Weippl","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://eprint.iacr.org/2017/791","source_label":"ePrint 2017/791","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2017 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"Merged mining lets the same proof of work stamp a child chain. Security is not transferred for free: the parent miners may not validate the child, and an attack on the child can be cheap in attention even when hash power is large.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/merged-mining","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/merged-mining","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/merged-mining","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0165","slug":"ni-pos","title":"Cryptocurrencies without Proof of Work","authors":"Iddo Bentov, Ariel Gabizon and Alex Mizrahi","year":2016,"date_label":"2016","publisher":"Iddo Bentov, Ariel Gabizon and Alex Mizrahi","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://arxiv.org/pdf/1406.5694","source_label":"arXiv:1406.5694","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2016 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"The paper studies stake-based chain selection and the cost of signing every fork. It is one of the early formal attempts to replace work with a scarce key.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/ni-pos","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/ni-pos","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/ni-pos","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0166","slug":"bulletproofs-range","title":"Confidential Assets","authors":"Andrew Poelstra, Adam Back, Mark Friedenbach, Gregory Maxwell and Pieter Wuille","year":2018,"date_label":"2018","publisher":"Andrew Poelstra, Adam Back, Mark Friedenbach, Gregory Maxwell and Pieter Wuille","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://blockstream.com/bitcoin17-final41.pdf","source_label":"Blockstream Bitcoin 2017 paper","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2018 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"Confidential assets put an asset tag beside a Pedersen commitment so a transaction can balance in several assets without publishing which output is which asset or how much.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bulletproofs-range","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bulletproofs-range","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bulletproofs-range","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0167","slug":"dandelion","title":"Dandelion: Redesigning the Bitcoin Network for Anonymity","authors":"Shaileshh Bojja Venkatakrishnan, Giulia Fanti and Pramod Viswanath","year":2017,"date_label":"2017","publisher":"Shaileshh Bojja Venkatakrishnan, Giulia Fanti and Pramod Viswanath","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://arxiv.org/pdf/1701.04439","source_label":"arXiv:1701.04439","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2017 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"Forward the transaction along a line, in a stem phase, and only then broadcast it, in a fluff phase, so the first flood is not centred on the sender.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/dandelion","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/dandelion","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/dandelion","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0168","slug":"zksnark-pinocchio","title":"Pinocchio: Nearly Practical Verifiable Computation","authors":"Bryan Parno, Jon Howell, Craig Gentry and Mariana Raykova","year":2013,"date_label":"2013","publisher":"Bryan Parno, Jon Howell, Craig Gentry and Mariana Raykova","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://eprint.iacr.org/2013/279","source_label":"ePrint 2013/279","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2013 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"Compile the program to a quadratic arithmetic program and prove it was satisfied. Verification is a small number of pairings, independent of the program's length, after a trusted setup.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/zksnark-pinocchio","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/zksnark-pinocchio","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/zksnark-pinocchio","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0169","slug":"plonk-universal","title":"Sonic: Zero-Knowledge SNARKs from Linear-Size Universal and Updatable Structured Reference Strings","authors":"Mary Maller, Sean Bowe, Markulf Kohlweiss and Sarah Meiklejohn","year":2019,"date_label":"2019","publisher":"Mary Maller, Sean Bowe, Markulf Kohlweiss and Sarah Meiklejohn","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://eprint.iacr.org/2019/099","source_label":"ePrint 2019/099","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2019 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"Sonic uses a structured reference string that is universal: one setup can serve many circuits, and it can be updated so the toxic waste is harder to keep.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/plonk-universal","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/plonk-universal","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/plonk-universal","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0170","slug":"stark-fri","title":"Fast Reed-Solomon Interactive Oracle Proofs of Proximity","authors":"Eli Ben-Sasson, Iddo Bentov, Yinon Horesh and Michael Riabzev","year":2018,"date_label":"2018","publisher":"Eli Ben-Sasson, Iddo Bentov, Yinon Horesh and Michael Riabzev","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://eccc.weizmann.ac.il/report/2017/134/","source_label":"ECCC 2017/134","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2018 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"FRI is the proximity test: fold the polynomial in rounds until a constant remains, and sample enough points that a cheating polynomial is caught.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/stark-fri","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/stark-fri","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/stark-fri","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0171","slug":"optimism-fault-proofs","title":"The Fault Proof System","authors":"Optimism","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Optimism","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://specs.optimism.io/fault-proof/index.html","source_label":"OP fault-proof spec","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"A dispute walks a single instruction of a state transition on a parent chain, so anyone who can post a bond can force the on-chain step that decides a bad proposal.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/optimism-fault-proofs","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/optimism-fault-proofs","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/optimism-fault-proofs","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0172","slug":"sovereign-rollup","title":"Rollups as Sovereign Chains","authors":"Celestia Labs","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Celestia Labs","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://celestia.org/learn/sovereign-rollups/an-introduction/","source_label":"Celestia learn","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"Publish transaction data to a data-availability layer. Let the rollup's own nodes interpret it. Fraud or validity proofs are checked by those nodes, not by an Ethereum bridge, unless someone adds one.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/sovereign-rollup","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/sovereign-rollup","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/sovereign-rollup","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0173","slug":"validium","title":"Validium and the Data-Availability Spectrum","authors":"StarkWare","year":2020,"date_label":"2020","publisher":"StarkWare","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://medium.com/starkware/volition-and-the-emerging-data-availability-spectrum-87e8bfa09bb","source_label":"StarkWare, 2020","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2020 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"Validium proves execution and keeps the data off the parent chain, with a committee or another store. Volition lets a user choose, per state, whether the data sits on the parent.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/validium","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/validium","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/validium","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0174","slug":"based-rollups","title":"Based Rollups","authors":"Justin Drake","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Justin Drake","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://ethresear.ch/t/based-rollups-superpowers-from-l1-sequencing/15016","source_label":"ethresear.ch","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"A based rollup lets the parent's proposers order the rollup's transactions. There is no separate sequencer to bribe or to wait for.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/based-rollups","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/based-rollups","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/based-rollups","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0175","slug":"shared-sequencing","title":"The Espresso Sequencer","authors":"Espresso Systems","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Espresso Systems","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://hackmd.io/@EspressoSystems/EspressoSequencer","source_label":"Espresso note","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"A shared sequencer orders transactions for many rollups. Each rollup still executes its own state. The sequencer sells order, not execution.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/shared-sequencing","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/shared-sequencing","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/shared-sequencing","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0176","slug":"payment-channels","title":"Bitcoin Payment Channels","authors":"Mike Hearn and Jeremy Spilman","year":2013,"date_label":"2013","publisher":"Mike Hearn and Jeremy Spilman","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Interoperability","topics":["Interoperability"],"source_url":"https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Payment_channels","source_label":"Bitcoin wiki, early design","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2013 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"Two parties lock coins in a shared output and exchange updated transactions that are not broadcast. Only the last state, or a dispute, hits the chain.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/payment-channels","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/payment-channels","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/payment-channels","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0177","slug":"eltoo","title":"eltoo: A Simplified Update Mechanism for Lightning","authors":"Christian Decker, Rusty Russell and Olaoluwa Osuntokun","year":2018,"date_label":"2018","publisher":"Christian Decker, Rusty Russell and Olaoluwa Osuntokun","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Interoperability","topics":["Interoperability"],"source_url":"https://blockstream.com/eltoo.pdf","source_label":"Blockstream, 2018","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2018 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"Eltoo replaces penalties with a sequence of state numbers. A later state can spend an earlier one. Nothing is confiscated. The latest number wins if it is published in time.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eltoo","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eltoo","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eltoo","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0178","slug":"channel-factories","title":"Scalable Funding of Bitcoin Micropayment Channel Networks","authors":"Conrad Burchert, Christian Decker and Roger Wattenhofer","year":2018,"date_label":"2018","publisher":"Conrad Burchert, Christian Decker and Roger Wattenhofer","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Interoperability","topics":["Interoperability"],"source_url":"https://tik-old.ee.ethz.ch/file/a20a865ce40d40c8f942cf206a7cba96/Scalable_Funding_Of_Blockchain_Micropayment_Networks%20(1).pdf","source_label":"Burchert, Decker, Wattenhofer","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2018 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"A factory is a shared on-chain output that several parties can use to allocate many channels off-chain, so the chain sees the factory and not every channel.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/channel-factories","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/channel-factories","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/channel-factories","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0179","slug":"discreet-log-contracts","title":"Discreet Log Contracts","authors":"Thaddeus Dryja","year":2017,"date_label":"2017","publisher":"Thaddeus Dryja","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://adiabat.github.io/dlc.pdf","source_label":"Dryja, 2017","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2017 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"The oracle publishes a signature on an outcome. Parties use adaptor signatures so the signature that settles the contract also reveals the oracle's secret, without the oracle knowing which contract it served.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/discreet-log-contracts","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/discreet-log-contracts","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/discreet-log-contracts","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0180","slug":"cfmm","title":"Improved Price Oracles: Constant Function Market Makers","authors":"Guillermo Angeris and Tarun Chitra","year":2020,"date_label":"2020","publisher":"Guillermo Angeris and Tarun Chitra","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://arxiv.org/pdf/2003.10001","source_label":"arXiv:2003.10001","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2020 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"A constant-function market maker defines a set of reserves that must stay on a curve. Prices and oracle quality fall out of that curve and of the path traders take.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/cfmm","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/cfmm","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/cfmm","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0181","slug":"yield-space","title":"The Yield Protocol: On-Chain Lending With Interest Rate Discovery","authors":"Allan Niemerg, Dan Robinson and Lev Livnev","year":2020,"date_label":"2020","publisher":"Allan Niemerg, Dan Robinson and Lev Livnev","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://yield.is/YieldSpace.pdf","source_label":"Yield protocol paper","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2020 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"Yield Space is an invariant between a target asset and a zero-coupon token. The price of the zero-coupon token implies a rate, and the curve is built so that rate behaves like a rate rather than like a spot commodity.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/yield-space","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/yield-space","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/yield-space","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0182","slug":"morpho-blue","title":"Morpho Blue: Permissionless Lending","authors":"Morpho Labs","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Morpho Labs","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Credit and stable value","topics":["Credit and stable value"],"source_url":"https://github.com/morpho-org/morpho-blue/blob/main/README.md","source_label":"Morpho Blue","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"Morpho Blue isolates a market to one loan asset, one collateral asset, one oracle, one LLTV and one rate model. Risk does not cross markets inside the core.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/morpho-blue","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/morpho-blue","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/morpho-blue","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0183","slug":"erc-4626","title":"Tokenized Vault Standard","authors":"Joey Santoro, t11s, Jet Jadeja, Alberto Cuesta Cañada, Señor Doggo","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Joey Santoro, t11s, Jet Jadeja, Alberto Cuesta Cañada, Señor Doggo","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Credit and stable value","topics":["Credit and stable value"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-4626","source_label":"EIP-4626","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"A tokenised vault has deposit, mint, withdraw and redeem, and a defined conversion between the asset and the share. The share is an ERC-20.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-4626","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-4626","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-4626","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0184","slug":"flash-loans","title":"ERC-3156: Flash Loans","authors":"Alberto Cuesta Cañada, Fiona Kobayashi, fubuloubu, Austin Williams","year":2020,"date_label":"2020","publisher":"Alberto Cuesta Cañada, Fiona Kobayashi, fubuloubu, Austin Williams","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Credit and stable value","topics":["Credit and stable value"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-3156","source_label":"EIP-3156","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2020 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"A flash lender sends assets to a receiver and requires that the same transaction returns them, plus a fee. If it does not, the transaction reverts. There is no default in the credit sense, because there is no time.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/flash-loans","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/flash-loans","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/flash-loans","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0185","slug":"uniswap-v1","title":"Uniswap v1","authors":"Hayden Adams","year":2018,"date_label":"2018","publisher":"Hayden Adams","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://hackmd.io/@HaydenAdams/HJ9jLsfTz","source_label":"Uniswap v1","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2018 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"A pool holds ETH and one ERC-20. The product of the reserves is constant. Anyone can trade against the pool or add both assets.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/uniswap-v1","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/uniswap-v1","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/uniswap-v1","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0186","slug":"gmx-v1","title":"GMX: A Decentralised Perpetual Exchange","authors":"GMX","year":2021,"date_label":"2021","publisher":"GMX","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://docs.gmx.io/docs/intro","source_label":"GMX docs","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2021 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"GMX v1 pools liquidity provider assets into a vault that takes the other side of leveraged trades. Prices come from an oracle. Traders pay fees to the pool.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/gmx-v1","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/gmx-v1","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/gmx-v1","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0187","slug":"perps-everlasting","title":"Everlasting Options","authors":"Dave White and Sam Bankman-Fried","year":2021,"date_label":"2021","publisher":"Dave White and Sam Bankman-Fried","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://www.paradigm.xyz/2021/05/everlasting-options","source_label":"Paradigm, 2021","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2021 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"An everlasting option is funded so that holding it approximates a rolling option position. The funding payment, not an expiry, keeps the price near the claim.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/perps-everlasting","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/perps-everlasting","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/perps-everlasting","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0188","slug":"ipfs","title":"IPFS - Content Addressed, Versioned, P2P File System","authors":"Juan Benet","year":2014,"date_label":"2014","publisher":"Juan Benet","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Storage and networks","topics":["Storage and networks"],"source_url":"https://ipfs.tech/ipfs/QmR7GSQM93Cx5eAg6a6yRzNde1FQv7uL6X1o4k7zrJa3LX/ipfs.draft3.pdf","source_label":"IPFS draft","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2014 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"Name a file by its hash. Retrieve it from any peer who has the bytes. Version history is a graph of hashes, not a folder on one machine.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/ipfs","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/ipfs","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/ipfs","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0189","slug":"kademlia","title":"Kademlia: A Peer-to-peer Information System Based on the XOR Metric","authors":"Petar Maymounkov and David Mazières","year":2002,"date_label":"2002","publisher":"Petar Maymounkov and David Mazières","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Storage and networks","topics":["Storage and networks"],"source_url":"https://pdos.csail.mit.edu/~petar/papers/maymounkov-kademlia-lncs.pdf","source_label":"Maymounkov and Mazières","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2002 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"Nodes have identifiers. Distance is XOR. Each node keeps contacts in buckets by distance, and a lookup walks toward the target in logarithmic steps.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/kademlia","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/kademlia","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/kademlia","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0190","slug":"verkle","title":"Verkle Trees","authors":"John Kuszmaul","year":2018,"date_label":"2018","publisher":"John Kuszmaul","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://math.mit.edu/research/highschool/primes/materials/2018/Kuszmaul.pdf","source_label":"Kuszmaul","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2018 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"Verkle trees use vector commitments so a proof of many leaves shares one commitment path. The proof is shorter, at the cost of a polynomial-commitment assumption.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/verkle","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/verkle","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/verkle","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0191","slug":"w3c-did","title":"Decentralized Identifiers (DIDs) v1.0","authors":"W3C","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"W3C","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://www.w3.org/TR/did-core/","source_label":"W3C Recommendation","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"A DID is an identifier whose document, including keys, can be resolved by a method. The method says where the document lives. The standard does not pick one blockchain.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/w3c-did","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/w3c-did","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/w3c-did","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0192","slug":"w3c-vc","title":"Verifiable Credentials Data Model v2.0","authors":"W3C","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"W3C","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://www.w3.org/TR/vc-data-model-2.0/","source_label":"W3C Recommendation","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"An issuer signs a set of claims about a subject. A holder later presents those claims, or a derivation, to a verifier. The verifier checks the issuer's signature, not a central account.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/w3c-vc","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/w3c-vc","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/w3c-vc","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0193","slug":"bbs-signatures","title":"BBS+ Signatures and Selective Disclosure","authors":"Jan Camenisch, Manu Drijvers and Anja Lehmann","year":2016,"date_label":"2016","publisher":"Jan Camenisch, Manu Drijvers and Anja Lehmann","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://eprint.iacr.org/2016/663","source_label":"ePrint 2016/663","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2016 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"A BBS-family signature can be proved in zero knowledge so a holder reveals only some messages and produces an unlinkable presentation.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bbs-signatures","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bbs-signatures","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bbs-signatures","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0194","slug":"eip-7702","title":"Set Code for EOAs","authors":"Vitalik Buterin, Sam Wilson, Ansgar Dietrichs and Matt Garnett","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Vitalik Buterin, Sam Wilson, Ansgar Dietrichs and Matt Garnett","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-7702","source_label":"EIP-7702","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"A transaction can temporarily, for the transaction's authority, delegate an externally owned account's code to a contract. The key still signs. The code that runs can batch, sponsor, or limit what the key may do.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7702","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7702","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7702","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0195","slug":"bip32","title":"Hierarchical Deterministic Wallets","authors":"Pieter Wuille","year":2012,"date_label":"2012","publisher":"Pieter Wuille","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0032.mediawiki","source_label":"BIP 32","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2012 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"A master secret derives a tree of child keys. A parent public key can derive child public keys on non-hardened paths, so a server can issue addresses without the private key.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip32","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip32","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip32","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0196","slug":"bip39","title":"Mnemonic Code for Generating Deterministic Keys","authors":"Marek Palatinus, Pavol Rusnak, Aaron Voisine and Sean Bowe","year":2013,"date_label":"2013","publisher":"Marek Palatinus, Pavol Rusnak, Aaron Voisine and Sean Bowe","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0039.mediawiki","source_label":"BIP 39","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2013 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"Encode entropy as a word list with a checksum, then stretch the words with a passphrase into a seed. The words are the backup. The passphrase is an extra secret, often empty.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip39","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip39","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip39","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0197","slug":"bip44","title":"Multi-Account Hierarchy for Deterministic Wallets","authors":"Marek Palatinus and Pavol Rusnak","year":2014,"date_label":"2014","publisher":"Marek Palatinus and Pavol Rusnak","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0044.mediawiki","source_label":"BIP 44","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2014 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"A path is purpose, coin type, account, change, and index. Accounts are separated so one seed can hold many identities without mixing their change.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip44","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip44","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip44","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0198","slug":"bip141","title":"Segregated Witness","authors":"Eric Lombrozo, Johnson Lau and Pieter Wuille","year":2015,"date_label":"2015","publisher":"Eric Lombrozo, Johnson Lau and Pieter Wuille","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0141.mediawiki","source_label":"BIP 141","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2015 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"Move witness data outside the input script. The transaction id that contracts depend on no longer covers the witness. A new weight limit counts witness bytes less than base bytes.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip141","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip141","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip141","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0199","slug":"bip174","title":"Partially Signed Bitcoin Transactions","authors":"Andrew Chow","year":2017,"date_label":"2017","publisher":"Andrew Chow","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0174.mediawiki","source_label":"BIP 174","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2017 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"A PSBT is a standard container for a transaction, the inputs' previous outputs, and the partial signatures. Roles are creator, updater, signer, combiner, finaliser and extractor.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip174","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip174","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip174","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0200","slug":"bip324","title":"Version 2 P2P Encrypted Transport Protocol","authors":"Dhruv Mehta, Tim Ruffing, Jonas Schnelli and Pieter Wuille","year":2019,"date_label":"2019","publisher":"Dhruv Mehta, Tim Ruffing, Jonas Schnelli and Pieter Wuille","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0324.mediawiki","source_label":"BIP 324","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2019 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"A v2 connection does an Elligator-style handshake and then encrypts the byte stream, so a passive observer cannot read the messages or easily identify the protocol.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip324","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip324","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip324","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0201","slug":"erc20","title":"Token Standard","authors":"Fabian Vogelsteller and Vitalik Buterin","year":2015,"date_label":"2015","publisher":"Fabian Vogelsteller and Vitalik Buterin","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-20","source_label":"EIP-20","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2015 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"A token contract exposes total supply, balance, transfer, and allowances. Wallets and exchanges can integrate one interface.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc20","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc20","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc20","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0202","slug":"erc721","title":"Non-Fungible Token Standard","authors":"William Entriken, Dieter Shirley, Jacob Evans and Nastassia Sachs","year":2018,"date_label":"2018","publisher":"William Entriken, Dieter Shirley, Jacob Evans and Nastassia Sachs","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-721","source_label":"EIP-721","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2018 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"Each token id has an owner. Transfer moves that id. An optional metadata URI points at a description. The standard does not say the description is true, or that the object exists off-chain.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc721","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc721","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc721","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0203","slug":"erc1155","title":"Multi Token Standard","authors":"Witek Radomski, Andrew Cooke, Philippe Castonguay, James Therien, Eric Binet and Ronan Sandford","year":2018,"date_label":"2018","publisher":"Witek Radomski, Andrew Cooke, Philippe Castonguay, James Therien, Eric Binet and Ronan Sandford","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-1155","source_label":"EIP-1155","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2018 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"One contract holds many ids. Each id can be fungible or not, by how many copies exist. A batch transfer moves several ids in one call. A receiver hook tries to stop tokens being sent to contracts that cannot hold them.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc1155","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc1155","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc1155","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0204","slug":"bip-8","title":"Version bits with lock-in by height","authors":"Shaolin Fry","year":2017,"date_label":"2017","publisher":"Shaolin Fry","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/8","source_label":"BIP 8","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2017 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"BIP 8, Version bits with lock-in by height. This document specifies an alternative to [[bip-0009.mediawiki|BIP9]] that corrects for a number of perceived mistakes.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-8","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-8","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-8","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0205","slug":"bip-9","title":"Version bits with timeout and delay","authors":"Pieter Wuille","year":2015,"date_label":"2015","publisher":"Pieter Wuille","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/9","source_label":"BIP 9","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2015 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"BIP 9, Version bits with timeout and delay. This document specifies a proposed change to the semantics of the 'version' field in Bitcoin blocks, allowing multiple backward-compatible changes (further called \"soft forks\") to be deployed in parallel.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-9","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-9","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-9","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0206","slug":"bip-11","title":"M-of-N Standard Transactions","authors":"Gavin Andresen","year":2011,"date_label":"2011","publisher":"Gavin Andresen","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/11","source_label":"BIP 11","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2011 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"BIP 11, M-of-N Standard Transactions. M-of-N-signatures required transactions as a new 'standard' transaction type.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-11","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-11","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-11","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0207","slug":"bip-13","title":"Address Format for pay-to-script-hash","authors":"Gavin Andresen","year":2011,"date_label":"2011","publisher":"Gavin Andresen","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/13","source_label":"BIP 13","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2011 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"BIP 13, Address Format for pay-to-script-hash. A new type of Bitcoin address to support arbitrarily complex transactions.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-13","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-13","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-13","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0208","slug":"bip-16","title":"Pay to Script Hash","authors":"Gavin Andresen","year":2012,"date_label":"2012","publisher":"Gavin Andresen","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/16","source_label":"BIP 16","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2012 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"BIP 16, Pay to Script Hash. A new \"standard\" transaction type for the Bitcoin scripting system, and defines additional validation rules that apply only to the new transactions.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-16","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-16","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-16","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0209","slug":"bip-18","title":"hashScriptCheck","authors":"Luke Dashjr","year":2012,"date_label":"2012","publisher":"Luke Dashjr","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/18","source_label":"BIP 18","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2012 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"BIP 18, hashScriptCheck. This BIP modifies the basic format of transaction inputs and outputs, replacing the current scriptSig and scriptPubKey (scripts executed to validate a transaction) with new contents: dataSig, scriptCheck, and hashScriptCheck.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-18","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-18","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-18","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0210","slug":"bip-22","title":"getblocktemplate - Fundamentals","authors":"Luke Dashjr","year":2012,"date_label":"2012","publisher":"Luke Dashjr","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/22","source_label":"BIP 22","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2012 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"BIP 22, getblocktemplate - Fundamentals. A new JSON-RPC method for \"smart\" Bitcoin miners and proxies.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-22","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-22","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-22","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0211","slug":"bip-23","title":"getblocktemplate - Pooled Mining","authors":"Luke Dashjr","year":2012,"date_label":"2012","publisher":"Luke Dashjr","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/23","source_label":"BIP 23","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2012 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"BIP 23, getblocktemplate - Pooled Mining. Extensions to the getblocktemplate JSON-RPC call to enhance pooled mining.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-23","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-23","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-23","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0212","slug":"bip-30","title":"Duplicate transactions","authors":"Pieter Wuille","year":2012,"date_label":"2012","publisher":"Pieter Wuille","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/30","source_label":"BIP 30","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2012 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"BIP 30, Duplicate transactions. This document gives a specification for dealing with duplicate transactions in the block chain, in an attempt to solve certain problems the reference implementation has with them.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-30","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-30","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-30","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0213","slug":"bip-31","title":"Pong message","authors":"Mike Hearn","year":2012,"date_label":"2012","publisher":"Mike Hearn","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Storage and networks","topics":["Storage and networks"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/31","source_label":"BIP 31","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2012 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"BIP 31, Pong message. This document describes a trivial protocol extension that makes it easier for clients to detect dead peer connections.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-31","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-31","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-31","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0214","slug":"bip-34","title":"Block v2, Height in Coinbase","authors":"Gavin Andresen","year":2012,"date_label":"2012","publisher":"Gavin Andresen","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/34","source_label":"BIP 34","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2012 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"BIP 34, Block v2, Height in Coinbase. Bitcoin blocks and transactions are versioned binary structures.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-34","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-34","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-34","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0215","slug":"bip-35","title":"mempool message","authors":"Jeff Garzik","year":2012,"date_label":"2012","publisher":"Jeff Garzik","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/35","source_label":"BIP 35","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2012 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"BIP 35, mempool message. Make a network node's transaction memory pool accessible via a new \"mempool\" message.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-35","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-35","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-35","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0216","slug":"bip-37","title":"Connection Bloom filtering","authors":"Mike Hearn","year":2012,"date_label":"2012","publisher":"Mike Hearn","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/37","source_label":"BIP 37","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2012 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"BIP 37, Connection Bloom filtering. New support to the peer-to-peer protocol that allows peers to reduce the amount of transaction data they are sent.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-37","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-37","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-37","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0217","slug":"bip-38","title":"Passphrase-protected private key","authors":"Mike Caldwell","year":2012,"date_label":"2012","publisher":"Mike Caldwell","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/38","source_label":"BIP 38","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2012 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"BIP 38, Passphrase-protected private key. A method is proposed for encrypting and encoding a passphrase-protected Bitcoin private key record in the form of a 58-character Base58Check-encoded printable string.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-38","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-38","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-38","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0218","slug":"bip-42","title":"A finite monetary supply for Bitcoin","authors":"Pieter Wuille","year":2014,"date_label":"2014","publisher":"Pieter Wuille","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/42","source_label":"BIP 42","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2014 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"BIP 42, A finite monetary supply for Bitcoin. Although it is widely believed that Satoshi was an inflation-hating goldbug he never said this, and in fact programmed Bitcoin's money supply to grow indefinitely, forever.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-42","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-42","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-42","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0219","slug":"bip-43","title":"Purpose Field for Deterministic Wallets","authors":"Marek Palatinus","year":2014,"date_label":"2014","publisher":"Marek Palatinus","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/43","source_label":"BIP 43","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2014 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"BIP 43, Purpose Field for Deterministic Wallets. A \"Purpose Field\" for use in deterministic wallets based on algorithm described in BIP-0032 (BIP32 from now on).","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-43","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-43","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-43","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0220","slug":"bip-45","title":"Structure for Deterministic P2SH Multisignature Wallets","authors":"Manuel Araoz","year":2014,"date_label":"2014","publisher":"Manuel Araoz","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/45","source_label":"BIP 45","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2014 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"BIP 45, Structure for Deterministic P2SH Multisignature Wallets. A structure for hierarchical deterministic P2SH multi-party multi-signature wallets (HDPM wallets from now on) based on the algorithm described in BIP-0032 (BIP32 from now on) and purpose scheme described in BIP-0043 (BIP43 from now on).","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-45","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-45","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-45","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0221","slug":"bip-47","title":"Reusable Payment Codes for Hierarchical Deterministic Wallets","authors":"Justus Ranvier","year":2015,"date_label":"2015","publisher":"Justus Ranvier","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Storage and networks","topics":["Storage and networks"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/47","source_label":"BIP 47","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2015 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"BIP 47, Reusable Payment Codes for Hierarchical Deterministic Wallets. A technique for creating a payment code which can be publicly advertised and associated with a real-life identity without creating the loss of security or privacy inherent to P2PKH address reuse.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-47","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-47","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-47","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0222","slug":"bip-48","title":"Multi-Script Hierarchy for Multi-Sig Wallets","authors":"Fontaine","year":2020,"date_label":"2020","publisher":"Fontaine","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/48","source_label":"BIP 48","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2020 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"BIP 48, Multi-Script Hierarchy for Multi-Sig Wallets. A logical hierarchy for deterministic multi-sig wallets based on an algorithm described in BIP-0067 (BIP67 from now on), BIP-0032 (BIP32 from now on), purpose scheme described in BIP-0043 (BIP43 from now on), and multi-account hierarchy described in BIP-0044 (BIP44 from now on).","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-48","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-48","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-48","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0223","slug":"bip-49","title":"Derivation scheme for P2WPKH-nested-in-P2SH based accounts","authors":"Daniel Weigl","year":2016,"date_label":"2016","publisher":"Daniel Weigl","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/49","source_label":"BIP 49","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2016 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"BIP 49, Derivation scheme for P2WPKH-nested-in-P2SH based accounts. The derivation scheme for HD wallets using the P2WPKH-nested-in-P2SH ([[bip-0141.mediawiki|BIP 141]]) serialization format for segregated witness transactions.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-49","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-49","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-49","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0224","slug":"bip-61","title":"Reject P2P message","authors":"Gavin Andresen","year":2014,"date_label":"2014","publisher":"Gavin Andresen","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Storage and networks","topics":["Storage and networks"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/61","source_label":"BIP 61","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2014 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"BIP 61, Reject P2P message. A new message type for the Bitcoin peer-to-peer network.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-61","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-61","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-61","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0225","slug":"bip-65","title":"OP_CHECKLOCKTIMEVERIFY","authors":"Peter Todd","year":2014,"date_label":"2014","publisher":"Peter Todd","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/65","source_label":"BIP 65","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2014 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"BIP 65, OP_CHECKLOCKTIMEVERIFY. A new opcode (OP_CHECKLOCKTIMEVERIFY) for the Bitcoin scripting system that allows a transaction output to be made unspendable until some point in the future.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-65","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-65","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-65","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0226","slug":"bip-66","title":"Strict DER signatures","authors":"Pieter Wuille","year":2015,"date_label":"2015","publisher":"Pieter Wuille","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/66","source_label":"BIP 66","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2015 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"BIP 66, Strict DER signatures. This document specifies proposed changes to the Bitcoin transaction validity rules to restrict signatures to strict DER encoding.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-66","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-66","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-66","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0227","slug":"bip-67","title":"Deterministic Pay-to-script-hash multi-signature addresses through public key sorting","authors":"Thomas Kerin","year":2015,"date_label":"2015","publisher":"Thomas Kerin","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/67","source_label":"BIP 67","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2015 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"BIP 67, Deterministic Pay-to-script-hash multi-signature addresses through public key sorting. A method to deterministically generate multi-signature pay-to-script-hash transaction scripts.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-67","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-67","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-67","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0228","slug":"bip-68","title":"Relative lock-time using consensus-enforced sequence numbers","authors":"Mark Friedenbach","year":2015,"date_label":"2015","publisher":"Mark Friedenbach","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Interoperability","topics":["Interoperability"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/68","source_label":"BIP 68","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2015 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"BIP 68, Relative lock-time using consensus-enforced sequence numbers. Relative lock-time (RLT) consensus-enforced semantics of the sequence number field to enable a signed transaction input to remain invalid for a defined period of time after confirmation of its corresponding outpoint.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-68","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-68","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-68","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0229","slug":"bip-69","title":"Lexicographical Indexing of Transaction Inputs and Outputs","authors":"Kristov Atlas","year":2015,"date_label":"2015","publisher":"Kristov Atlas","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/69","source_label":"BIP 69","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2015 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"BIP 69, Lexicographical Indexing of Transaction Inputs and Outputs. Currently there is no standard for bitcoin wallet clients when ordering transaction inputs and outputs.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-69","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-69","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-69","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0230","slug":"bip-70","title":"Payment Protocol","authors":"Gavin Andresen","year":2013,"date_label":"2013","publisher":"Gavin Andresen","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Storage and networks","topics":["Storage and networks"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/70","source_label":"BIP 70","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2013 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"BIP 70, Payment Protocol. A protocol for communication between a merchant and their customer, enabling both a better customer experience and better security against man-in-the-middle attacks on the payment process.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-70","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-70","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-70","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0231","slug":"bip-71","title":"Payment Protocol MIME types","authors":"Gavin Andresen","year":2013,"date_label":"2013","publisher":"Gavin Andresen","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/71","source_label":"BIP 71","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2013 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"BIP 71, Payment Protocol MIME types. A MIME (RFC 2046) Media Type for Bitcoin payment request messages.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-71","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-71","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-71","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0232","slug":"bip-72","title":"bitcoin: uri extensions for Payment Protocol","authors":"Gavin Andresen","year":2013,"date_label":"2013","publisher":"Gavin Andresen","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/72","source_label":"BIP 72","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2013 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"BIP 72, bitcoin: uri extensions for Payment Protocol. An extension to the bitcoin: URI scheme (BIP 21) to support the payment protocol (BIP 70).","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-72","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-72","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-72","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0233","slug":"bip-73","title":"Use \"Accept\" header for response type negotiation with Payment Request URLs","authors":"Stephen Pair","year":2013,"date_label":"2013","publisher":"Stephen Pair","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/73","source_label":"BIP 73","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2013 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"BIP 73, Use \"Accept\" header for response type negotiation with Payment Request URLs. An enhancement to the payment protocol ([[bip-0070.mediawiki|BIP 70]]) that addresses the need for short URLs when scanning from QR codes.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-73","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-73","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-73","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0234","slug":"bip-75","title":"Out of Band Address Exchange using Payment Protocol Encryption","authors":"Justin Newton","year":2015,"date_label":"2015","publisher":"Justin Newton","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/75","source_label":"BIP 75","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2015 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"BIP 75, Out of Band Address Exchange using Payment Protocol Encryption. This BIP is an extension to BIP 70 that provides two enhancements to the existing Payment Protocol.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-75","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-75","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-75","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0235","slug":"bip-84","title":"Derivation scheme for P2WPKH based accounts","authors":"Pavol Rusnak","year":2017,"date_label":"2017","publisher":"Pavol Rusnak","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/84","source_label":"BIP 84","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2017 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"BIP 84, Derivation scheme for P2WPKH based accounts. The derivation scheme for HD wallets using the P2WPKH ([[bip-0173.mediawiki|BIP 173]]) serialization format for segregated witness transactions.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-84","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-84","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-84","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0236","slug":"bip-85","title":"Deterministic Entropy From BIP32 Keychains","authors":"Ethan Kosakovsky","year":2020,"date_label":"2020","publisher":"Ethan Kosakovsky","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/85","source_label":"BIP 85","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2020 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"BIP 85, Deterministic Entropy From BIP32 Keychains. ''\"One Seed to rule them all,'' ''One Key to find them,'' ''One Path to bring them all,'' ''And in cryptography bind them.\"'' It is not possible to maintain one single (mnemonic) seed backup for all keychains used across various wallets because there are a variety of incompatible standards.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-85","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-85","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-85","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0237","slug":"bip-86","title":"Key Derivation for Single Key P2TR Outputs","authors":"Ava Chow","year":2021,"date_label":"2021","publisher":"Ava Chow","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/86","source_label":"BIP 86","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2021 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"BIP 86, Key Derivation for Single Key P2TR Outputs. This document suggests a derivation scheme for HD wallets whose keys are involved in single key P2TR ([[bip-0341.mediawiki|BIP 341]]) outputs as the Taproot internal key.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-86","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-86","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-86","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0238","slug":"bip-87","title":"Hierarchy for Deterministic Multisig Wallets","authors":"Robert Spigler","year":2020,"date_label":"2020","publisher":"Robert Spigler","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/87","source_label":"BIP 87","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2020 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"BIP 87, Hierarchy for Deterministic Multisig Wallets. A sane hierarchy for deterministic multisig wallets based on an algorithm described in BIP-0032 (BIP32 from now on), purpose scheme described in BIP-0043 (BIP43 from now on), and multi-account hierarchy described in BIP-0044 (BIP44 from now on).","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-87","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-87","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-87","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0239","slug":"bip-88","title":"Hierarchical Deterministic Path Templates","authors":"Dmitry Petukhov","year":2020,"date_label":"2020","publisher":"Dmitry Petukhov","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/88","source_label":"BIP 88","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2020 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"BIP 88, Hierarchical Deterministic Path Templates. This document describes a format for the representation of the templates that specify the constraints that can be imposed on BIP32 derivation paths.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-88","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-88","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-88","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0240","slug":"bip-89","title":"Chain Code Delegation","authors":"Jesse Posner","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Jesse Posner","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/89","source_label":"BIP 89","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"BIP 89, Chain Code Delegation. Chain Code Delegation (CCD) is a method for multi-signature wallets in which a privileged participant withholds BIP32 chain codes from one or more non-privileged participants, and supplies per-input scalar tweaks at signing time.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-89","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-89","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-89","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0241","slug":"bip-90","title":"Buried Deployments","authors":"Suhas Daftuar","year":2016,"date_label":"2016","publisher":"Suhas Daftuar","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/90","source_label":"BIP 90","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2016 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"BIP 90, Buried Deployments. Prior soft forks (BIP 34, BIP 65, and BIP 66) were activated via miner signaling in block version numbers.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-90","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-90","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-90","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0242","slug":"bip-91","title":"Reduced threshold Segwit MASF","authors":"James Hilliard","year":2017,"date_label":"2017","publisher":"James Hilliard","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/91","source_label":"BIP 91","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2017 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"BIP 91, Reduced threshold Segwit MASF. This document specifies a method to activate the existing BIP9 segwit deployment with a majority hashpower less than 95%.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-91","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-91","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-91","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0243","slug":"bip-94","title":"Testnet 4","authors":"Fabian Jahr","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Fabian Jahr","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/94","source_label":"BIP 94","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"BIP 94, Testnet 4. A new test network with the goal to replace Testnet 3.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-94","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-94","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-94","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0244","slug":"bip-111","title":"NODE_BLOOM service bit","authors":"Matt Corallo","year":2015,"date_label":"2015","publisher":"Matt Corallo","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Storage and networks","topics":["Storage and networks"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/111","source_label":"BIP 111","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2015 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"BIP 111, NODE_BLOOM service bit. This BIP extends BIP 37, Connection Bloom filtering, by defining a service bit to allow peers to advertise that they support bloom filters explicitly.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-111","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-111","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-111","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0245","slug":"bip-112","title":"CHECKSEQUENCEVERIFY","authors":"BtcDrak","year":2015,"date_label":"2015","publisher":"BtcDrak","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/112","source_label":"BIP 112","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2015 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"BIP 112, CHECKSEQUENCEVERIFY. A new opcode (CHECKSEQUENCEVERIFY) for the Bitcoin scripting system that in combination with BIP 68 allows execution pathways of a script to be restricted based on the age of the output being spent.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-112","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-112","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-112","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0246","slug":"bip-113","title":"Median time-past as endpoint for lock-time calculations","authors":"Thomas Kerin","year":2015,"date_label":"2015","publisher":"Thomas Kerin","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/113","source_label":"BIP 113","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2015 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"BIP 113, Median time-past as endpoint for lock-time calculations. This BIP is a proposal to redefine the semantics used in determining a time-locked transaction's eligibility for inclusion in a block.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-113","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-113","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-113","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0247","slug":"bip-123","title":"BIP Classification","authors":"Eric Lombrozo","year":2015,"date_label":"2015","publisher":"Eric Lombrozo","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Storage and networks","topics":["Storage and networks"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/123","source_label":"BIP 123","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2015 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"BIP 123, BIP Classification. This document describes a classification scheme for BIPs.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-123","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-123","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-123","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0248","slug":"bip-125","title":"Opt-in Full Replace-by-Fee Signaling","authors":"David A. Harding","year":2015,"date_label":"2015","publisher":"David A. Harding","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/125","source_label":"BIP 125","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2015 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"BIP 125, Opt-in Full Replace-by-Fee Signaling. Many nodes today will not replace any transaction in their mempool with another transaction that spends the same inputs, making it difficult for spenders to adjust their previously-sent transactions to deal with unexpected confirmation delays or to perform other useful replacements.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-125","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-125","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-125","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0249","slug":"bip-127","title":"Simple Proof-of-Reserves Transactions","authors":"Steven Roose","year":2019,"date_label":"2019","publisher":"Steven Roose","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/127","source_label":"BIP 127","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2019 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"BIP 127, Simple Proof-of-Reserves Transactions. A simple way to construct proof-of-reserves transactions.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-127","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-127","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-127","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0250","slug":"bip-130","title":"sendheaders message","authors":"Suhas Daftuar","year":2015,"date_label":"2015","publisher":"Suhas Daftuar","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Storage and networks","topics":["Storage and networks"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/130","source_label":"BIP 130","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2015 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"BIP 130, sendheaders message. Add a new message, \"sendheaders\", which indicates that a node prefers to receive new block announcements via a \"headers\" message rather than an \"inv\".","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-130","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-130","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-130","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0251","slug":"bip-133","title":"feefilter message","authors":"Alex Morcos","year":2016,"date_label":"2016","publisher":"Alex Morcos","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Storage and networks","topics":["Storage and networks"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/133","source_label":"BIP 133","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2016 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"BIP 133, feefilter message. Add a new message, \"feefilter\", which serves to instruct peers not to send \"inv\"'s to the node for transactions with fees below the specified fee rate.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-133","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-133","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-133","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0252","slug":"bip-137","title":"Signatures of Messages using Private Keys","authors":"Christopher Gilliard","year":2019,"date_label":"2019","publisher":"Christopher Gilliard","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Credit and stable value","topics":["Credit and stable value"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/137","source_label":"BIP 137","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2019 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"BIP 137, Signatures of Messages using Private Keys. This document describes a signature format for signing messages with Bitcoin private keys.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-137","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-137","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-137","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0253","slug":"bip-143","title":"Transaction Signature Verification for Version 0 Witness Program","authors":"Johnson Lau","year":2016,"date_label":"2016","publisher":"Johnson Lau","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/143","source_label":"BIP 143","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2016 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"BIP 143, Transaction Signature Verification for Version 0 Witness Program. This proposal defines a new transaction digest algorithm for signature verification in version 0 witness program, in order to minimize redundant data hashing in verification, and to cover the input value by the signature.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-143","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-143","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-143","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0254","slug":"bip-144","title":"Segregated Witness (Peer Services)","authors":"Eric Lombrozo","year":2016,"date_label":"2016","publisher":"Eric Lombrozo","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/144","source_label":"BIP 144","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2016 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"BIP 144, Segregated Witness (Peer Services). New messages and serialization formats for propagation of transactions and blocks committing to segregated witness structures.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-144","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-144","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-144","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0255","slug":"bip-145","title":"getblocktemplate Updates for Segregated Witness","authors":"Luke Dashjr","year":2016,"date_label":"2016","publisher":"Luke Dashjr","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/145","source_label":"BIP 145","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2016 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"BIP 145, getblocktemplate Updates for Segregated Witness. Modifications to the getblocktemplate JSON-RPC call ([[bip-0022.mediawiki|BIP 22]]) to support segregated witness as defined by [[bip-0141.mediawiki|BIP 141]].","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-145","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-145","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-145","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0256","slug":"bip-147","title":"Dealing with dummy stack element malleability","authors":"Johnson Lau","year":2016,"date_label":"2016","publisher":"Johnson Lau","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/147","source_label":"BIP 147","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2016 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"BIP 147, Dealing with dummy stack element malleability. This document specifies proposed changes to the Bitcoin transaction validity rules to fix a malleability vector in the extra stack element consumed by OP_CHECKMULTISIG and OP_CHECKMULTISIGVERIFY .","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-147","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-147","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-147","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0257","slug":"bip-148","title":"Mandatory activation of segwit deployment","authors":"Shaolin Fry","year":2017,"date_label":"2017","publisher":"Shaolin Fry","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/148","source_label":"BIP 148","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2017 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"BIP 148, Mandatory activation of segwit deployment. This document specifies a BIP16 like soft fork flag day activation of the segregated witness BIP9 deployment known as \"segwit\".","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-148","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-148","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-148","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0258","slug":"bip-152","title":"Compact Block Relay","authors":"Matt Corallo","year":2016,"date_label":"2016","publisher":"Matt Corallo","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Storage and networks","topics":["Storage and networks"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/152","source_label":"BIP 152","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2016 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"BIP 152, Compact Block Relay. Compact blocks on the wire as a way to save bandwidth for nodes on the P2P network.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-152","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-152","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-152","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0259","slug":"bip-155","title":"addrv2 message","authors":"Wladimir J. van der Laan","year":2019,"date_label":"2019","publisher":"Wladimir J. van der Laan","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Storage and networks","topics":["Storage and networks"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/155","source_label":"BIP 155","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2019 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"BIP 155, addrv2 message. The key words \"MUST\", \"MUST NOT\", \"REQUIRED\", \"SHALL\", \"SHALL NOT\", \"SHOULD\", \"SHOULD NOT\", \"RECOMMENDED\", \"MAY\", and \"OPTIONAL\" in this document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119 [https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2119 RFC 2119] .","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-155","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-155","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-155","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0260","slug":"bip-157","title":"Client Side Block Filtering","authors":"Olaoluwa Osuntokun","year":2017,"date_label":"2017","publisher":"Olaoluwa Osuntokun","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/157","source_label":"BIP 157","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2017 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"BIP 157, Client Side Block Filtering. A new light client protocol in Bitcoin that improves upon currently available options.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-157","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-157","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-157","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0261","slug":"bip-158","title":"Compact Block Filters for Light Clients","authors":"Olaoluwa Osuntokun","year":2017,"date_label":"2017","publisher":"Olaoluwa Osuntokun","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Storage and networks","topics":["Storage and networks"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/158","source_label":"BIP 158","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2017 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"BIP 158, Compact Block Filters for Light Clients. A structure for compact filters on block data, for use in the BIP 157 light client protocol bip-0157.mediawiki .","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-158","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-158","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-158","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0262","slug":"bip-159","title":"NODE_NETWORK_LIMITED service bit","authors":"Jonas Schnelli","year":2017,"date_label":"2017","publisher":"Jonas Schnelli","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Storage and networks","topics":["Storage and networks"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/159","source_label":"BIP 159","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2017 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"BIP 159, NODE_NETWORK_LIMITED service bit. Define a service bit that allows pruned peers to signal their limited services.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-159","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-159","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-159","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0263","slug":"bip-173","title":"Base32 address format for native v0-16 witness outputs","authors":"Pieter Wuille","year":2017,"date_label":"2017","publisher":"Pieter Wuille","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/173","source_label":"BIP 173","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2017 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"BIP 173, Base32 address format for native v0-16 witness outputs. We first describe the general checksummed base32 '''Why use base32 at all?''' The lack of mixed case makes it more efficient to read out loud or to put into QR codes.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-173","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-173","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-173","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0264","slug":"bip-176","title":"Bits Denomination","authors":"Jimmy Song","year":2017,"date_label":"2017","publisher":"Jimmy Song","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/176","source_label":"BIP 176","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2017 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"BIP 176, Bits Denomination. Bits is presented here as the standard term for 100 (one hundred) satoshis or 1/1,000,000 (one one-millionth) of a bitcoin.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-176","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-176","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-176","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0265","slug":"bip-179","title":"Name for payment recipient identifiers","authors":"Emil Engler","year":2019,"date_label":"2019","publisher":"Emil Engler","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/179","source_label":"BIP 179","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2019 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"BIP 179, Name for payment recipient identifiers. A new term for 'address' Bitcoin addresses are intended to be only used '''once''' and you should generate a new one for every new incoming payment.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-179","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-179","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-179","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0266","slug":"bip-321","title":"URI Scheme","authors":"Matt Corallo","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Matt Corallo","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/321","source_label":"BIP 321","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"BIP 321, URI Scheme. A URI scheme for describing Bitcoin payment instructions.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-321","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-321","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-321","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0267","slug":"bip-322","title":"Generic Signed Message Format","authors":"Karl-Johan Alm","year":2018,"date_label":"2018","publisher":"Karl-Johan Alm","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Storage and networks","topics":["Storage and networks"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/322","source_label":"BIP 322","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2018 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"BIP 322, Generic Signed Message Format. A standard for interoperable signed messages based on the Bitcoin Script format, either for proving availability of funds, or for committing to a message as the intended recipient of funds sent to the invoice address.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-322","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-322","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-322","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0268","slug":"bip-325","title":"Signet","authors":"Karl-Johan Alm","year":2019,"date_label":"2019","publisher":"Karl-Johan Alm","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Storage and networks","topics":["Storage and networks"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/325","source_label":"BIP 325","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2019 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"BIP 325, Signet. A new type of test network where signatures are used in addition to proof of work for block progress, enabling much better coordination and robustness (be reliably unreliable), for persistent, longer-term testing scenarios involving multiple independent parties.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-325","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-325","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-325","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0269","slug":"bip-328","title":"Derivation Scheme for MuSig2 Aggregate Keys","authors":"Ava Chow","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Ava Chow","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/328","source_label":"BIP 328","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"BIP 328, Derivation Scheme for MuSig2 Aggregate Keys. This document specifies how BIP 32 extended public keys can be constructed from a BIP 327 MuSig2 aggregate public key and how such keys should be used for key derivation.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-328","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-328","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-328","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0270","slug":"bip-339","title":"WTXID-based transaction relay","authors":"Suhas Daftuar","year":2020,"date_label":"2020","publisher":"Suhas Daftuar","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Storage and networks","topics":["Storage and networks"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/339","source_label":"BIP 339","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2020 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"BIP 339, WTXID-based transaction relay. Two changes to the p2p protocol to support transaction relay based on the BIP 141 wtxid of a transaction, rather than its txid.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-339","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-339","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-339","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0271","slug":"bip-342","title":"Validation of Taproot Scripts","authors":"Pieter Wuille","year":2020,"date_label":"2020","publisher":"Pieter Wuille","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/342","source_label":"BIP 342","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2020 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"BIP 342, Validation of Taproot Scripts. The rules below only apply when validating a transaction input for which all of the conditions below are true: The transaction input is a '''segregated witness spend''' (i.e., the scriptPubKey contains a witness program as defined in [[bip-0141.mediawiki|BIP141]]).","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-342","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-342","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-342","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0272","slug":"bip-347","title":"OP_CAT in Tapscript","authors":"Ethan Heilman","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Ethan Heilman","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Interoperability","topics":["Interoperability"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/347","source_label":"BIP 347","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"BIP 347, OP_CAT in Tapscript. OP_CAT as a tapscript opcode which allows the concatenation of two values on the stack.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-347","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-347","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-347","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0273","slug":"bip-350","title":"Bech32m format for v1+ witness addresses","authors":"Pieter Wuille","year":2020,"date_label":"2020","publisher":"Pieter Wuille","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/350","source_label":"BIP 350","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2020 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"BIP 350, Bech32m format for v1+ witness addresses. We first specify the new checksum algorithm, and then document how it should be used for future Bitcoin addresses.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-350","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-350","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-350","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0274","slug":"bip-352","title":"Silent Payments","authors":"josibake","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"josibake","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/352","source_label":"BIP 352","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"BIP 352, Silent Payments. We use the following functions and conventions: ''outpoint'' (36 bytes): the COutPoint of an input (32-byte txid, least significant byte first || 4-byte vout, least significant byte first) '''Why are outpoints little-endian?''' Despite using big endian throughout the rest of the BIP, outpoints are sorted and hashed matching their transaction serialization, which is little-endian.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-352","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-352","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-352","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0275","slug":"bip-353","title":"DNS Payment Instructions","authors":"Matt Corallo","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Matt Corallo","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/353","source_label":"BIP 353","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"BIP 353, DNS Payment Instructions. A standard format for encoding [[bip-0021.mediawiki|BIP 21]] URI schemes in DNS TXT records.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-353","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-353","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-353","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0276","slug":"bip-370","title":"PSBT Version 2","authors":"Ava Chow","year":2021,"date_label":"2021","publisher":"Ava Chow","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/370","source_label":"BIP 370","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2021 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"BIP 370, PSBT Version 2. PSBT Version 2 (PSBTv2) only specifies new fields and field inclusion/exclusion requirements.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-370","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-370","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-370","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0277","slug":"bip-371","title":"Taproot Fields for PSBT","authors":"Ava Chow","year":2021,"date_label":"2021","publisher":"Ava Chow","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/371","source_label":"BIP 371","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2021 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"BIP 371, Taproot Fields for PSBT. The new per-input types are defined as follows: {| ! Name ! ! ! Description ! ! Description ! Versions Requiring Inclusion ! Versions Requiring Exclusion ! Versions Allowing Inclusion |- | Taproot Key Spend Signature | PSBT_IN_TAP_KEY_SIG = 0x13 | None | No key data '''Why is there no key data for PSBT_IN_TAP_KEY_SIG '''The signature in a key path spend corresponds directly with the pubkey provided in the output script.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-371","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-371","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-371","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0278","slug":"bip-373","title":"MuSig2 PSBT Fields","authors":"Ava Chow","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Ava Chow","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/373","source_label":"BIP 373","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"BIP 373, MuSig2 PSBT Fields. The new per-input types are defined as follows: {| ! Name ! ! ! ! Versions Requiring Inclusion ! Versions Requiring Exclusion ! Versions Allowing Inclusion |- | rowspan=\"2\"|MuSig2 Participant Public Keys | rowspan=\"2\"| PSBT_IN_MUSIG2_PARTICIPANT_PUBKEYS = 0x1a | | | rowspan=\"2\"| | rowspan=\"2\"| | rowspan=\"2\"| 0, 2 |- | The MuSig2 aggregate public key (compressed) '''Why the compressed aggregate public key instead of x-only?''' [[bip-0032.mediawiki|BIP 32]] public keys can be derived from a [[bip-0327.mediawiki|BIP 327]] MuSig2 aggregate public key (see: [[bip-0328.mediawiki|BIP 328]]).","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-373","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-373","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-373","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0279","slug":"bip-380","title":"Output Script Descriptors General Operation","authors":"Pieter Wuille","year":2021,"date_label":"2021","publisher":"Pieter Wuille","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/380","source_label":"BIP 380","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2021 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"BIP 380, Output Script Descriptors General Operation. Output Script Descriptors are a simple language which can be used to describe collections of output scripts.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-380","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-380","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-380","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0280","slug":"bip-381","title":"Non-Segwit Output Script Descriptors","authors":"Pieter Wuille","year":2021,"date_label":"2021","publisher":"Pieter Wuille","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Storage and networks","topics":["Storage and networks"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/381","source_label":"BIP 381","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2021 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"BIP 381, Non-Segwit Output Script Descriptors. This document specifies pk() , pkh() , and sh() output script descriptors.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-381","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-381","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-381","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0281","slug":"bip-382","title":"Segwit Output Script Descriptors","authors":"Pieter Wuille","year":2021,"date_label":"2021","publisher":"Pieter Wuille","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/382","source_label":"BIP 382","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2021 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"BIP 382, Segwit Output Script Descriptors. This document specifies wpkh() , and wsh() output script descriptors.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-382","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-382","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-382","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0282","slug":"bip-383","title":"Multisig Output Script Descriptors","authors":"Pieter Wuille","year":2021,"date_label":"2021","publisher":"Pieter Wuille","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/383","source_label":"BIP 383","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2021 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"BIP 383, Multisig Output Script Descriptors. This document specifies multi() , and sortedmulti() output script descriptors.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-383","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-383","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-383","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0283","slug":"bip-384","title":"combo() Output Script Descriptors","authors":"Pieter Wuille","year":2021,"date_label":"2021","publisher":"Pieter Wuille","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Storage and networks","topics":["Storage and networks"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/384","source_label":"BIP 384","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2021 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"BIP 384, combo() Output Script Descriptors. This document specifies combo() output script descriptors.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-384","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-384","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-384","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0284","slug":"bip-385","title":"raw() and addr() Output Script Descriptors","authors":"Pieter Wuille","year":2021,"date_label":"2021","publisher":"Pieter Wuille","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/385","source_label":"BIP 385","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2021 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"BIP 385, raw() and addr() Output Script Descriptors. This document specifies raw() and addr() output script descriptors.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-385","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-385","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-385","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0285","slug":"bip-386","title":"tr() Output Script Descriptors","authors":"Pieter Wuille","year":2021,"date_label":"2021","publisher":"Pieter Wuille","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/386","source_label":"BIP 386","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2021 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"BIP 386, tr() Output Script Descriptors. This document specifies tr() output script descriptors.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-386","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-386","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-386","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0286","slug":"bip-387","title":"Tapscript Multisig Output Script Descriptors","authors":"Pieter Wuille","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Pieter Wuille","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/387","source_label":"BIP 387","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"BIP 387, Tapscript Multisig Output Script Descriptors. This document specifies multi_a() and sortedmulti_a() output script descriptors.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-387","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-387","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-387","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0287","slug":"bip-388","title":"Wallet Policies for Descriptor Wallets","authors":"Salvatore Ingala","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Salvatore Ingala","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/388","source_label":"BIP 388","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"BIP 388, Wallet Policies for Descriptor Wallets. Software wallets and hardware signing devices typically partition funds into separate \"accounts\".","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-388","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-388","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-388","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0288","slug":"eip-140","title":"REVERT instruction","authors":"Alex Beregszaszi , Nikolai Mushegian","year":2017,"date_label":"2017","publisher":"Alex Beregszaszi , Nikolai Mushegian","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-140","source_label":"EIP 140","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2017 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"EIP 140, REVERT instruction. The REVERT instruction provides a way to stop execution and revert state changes, without consuming all provided gas and with the ability to return a reason.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-140","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-140","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-140","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0289","slug":"eip-141","title":"Designated invalid EVM instruction","authors":"Alex Beregszaszi","year":2017,"date_label":"2017","publisher":"Alex Beregszaszi","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-141","source_label":"EIP 141","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2017 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"EIP 141, Designated invalid EVM instruction. An instruction is designated to remain as an invalid instruction.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-141","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-141","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-141","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0290","slug":"eip-145","title":"Bitwise shifting instructions in EVM","authors":"Alex Beregszaszi , Paweł Bylica","year":2017,"date_label":"2017","publisher":"Alex Beregszaszi , Paweł Bylica","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-145","source_label":"EIP 145","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2017 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"EIP 145, Bitwise shifting instructions in EVM. Native bitwise shifting instructions are introduced, which are more efficient processing wise on the host and are cheaper to use by a contract.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-145","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-145","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-145","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0291","slug":"eip-152","title":"Add BLAKE2 compression function `F` precompile","authors":"Tjaden Hess , Matt Luongo , Piotr Dyraga , James Hancock","year":2016,"date_label":"2016","publisher":"Tjaden Hess , Matt Luongo , Piotr Dyraga , James Hancock","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Interoperability","topics":["Interoperability"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-152","source_label":"EIP 152","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2016 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"EIP 152, Add BLAKE2 compression function `F` precompile. This EIP will enable the BLAKE2b hash function and other higher-round 64-bit BLAKE2 variants to run cheaply on the EVM, allowing easier interoperability between Ethereum and Zcash as well as other Equihash-based PoW coins.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-152","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-152","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-152","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0292","slug":"eip-196","title":"Precompiled contracts for addition and scalar multiplication on the elliptic curve alt_bn128","authors":"Christian Reitwiessner","year":2017,"date_label":"2017","publisher":"Christian Reitwiessner","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-196","source_label":"EIP 196","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2017 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"EIP 196, Precompiled contracts for addition and scalar multiplication on the elliptic curve alt_bn128. Precompiled contracts for elliptic curve operations are required in order to perform zkSNARK verification within the block gas limit.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-196","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-196","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-196","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0293","slug":"eip-197","title":"Precompiled contracts for optimal ate pairing check on the elliptic curve alt_bn128","authors":"Vitalik Buterin , Christian Reitwiessner","year":2017,"date_label":"2017","publisher":"Vitalik Buterin , Christian Reitwiessner","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-197","source_label":"EIP 197","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2017 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"EIP 197, Precompiled contracts for optimal ate pairing check on the elliptic curve alt_bn128. Precompiled contracts for elliptic curve pairing operations are required in order to perform zkSNARK verification within the block gas limit.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-197","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-197","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-197","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0294","slug":"eip-211","title":"New opcodes: RETURNDATASIZE and RETURNDATACOPY","authors":"Christian Reitwiessner","year":2017,"date_label":"2017","publisher":"Christian Reitwiessner","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-211","source_label":"EIP 211","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2017 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"EIP 211, New opcodes: RETURNDATASIZE and RETURNDATACOPY. A mechanism to allow returning arbitrary-length data inside the EVM has been requested for quite a while now.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-211","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-211","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-211","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0295","slug":"eip-214","title":"New opcode STATICCALL","authors":"Vitalik Buterin , Christian Reitwiessner","year":2017,"date_label":"2017","publisher":"Vitalik Buterin , Christian Reitwiessner","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-214","source_label":"EIP 214","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2017 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"EIP 214, New opcode STATICCALL. To increase smart contract security, this proposal adds a new opcode that can be used to call another contract (or itself) while disallowing any modifications to the state during the call (and its subcalls, if present).","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-214","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-214","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-214","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0296","slug":"eip-225","title":"Clique proof-of-authority consensus protocol","authors":"Péter Szilágyi","year":2017,"date_label":"2017","publisher":"Péter Szilágyi","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-225","source_label":"EIP 225","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2017 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"EIP 225, Clique proof-of-authority consensus protocol. Clique is a proof-of-authority consensus protocol.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-225","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-225","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-225","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0297","slug":"eip-234","title":"Add `blockHash` to JSON-RPC filter options.","authors":"Micah Zoltu","year":2017,"date_label":"2017","publisher":"Micah Zoltu","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-234","source_label":"EIP 234","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2017 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"EIP 234, Add `blockHash` to JSON-RPC filter options.. Add an option to JSON-RPC filter options (used by eth_newFilter and eth_getLogs) that allows specifying the block hash that should be included in the results.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-234","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-234","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-234","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0298","slug":"eip-627","title":"Whisper Specification","authors":"Vlad Gluhovsky","year":2017,"date_label":"2017","publisher":"Vlad Gluhovsky","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Storage and networks","topics":["Storage and networks"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-627","source_label":"EIP 627","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2017 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"EIP 627, Whisper Specification. The format of Whisper messages within the ÐΞVp2p Wire Protocol.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-627","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-627","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-627","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0299","slug":"eip-658","title":"Embedding transaction status code in receipts","authors":"Nick Johnson","year":2017,"date_label":"2017","publisher":"Nick Johnson","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-658","source_label":"EIP 658","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2017 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"EIP 658, Embedding transaction status code in receipts. This EIP replaces the intermediate state root field of the receipt with a status code indicating if the top-level call succeeded or failed.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-658","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-658","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-658","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0300","slug":"eip-684","title":"Revert creation in case of collision","authors":"Vitalik Buterin , Renan Rodrigues de Souza","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Vitalik Buterin , Renan Rodrigues de Souza","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-684","source_label":"EIP 684","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"EIP 684, Revert creation in case of collision. This EIP causes contract creation to throw an error when attempted at an address with pre-existing code.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-684","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-684","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-684","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0301","slug":"eip-695","title":"Create `eth_chainId` method for JSON-RPC","authors":"Isaac Ardis , Wei Tang , Fan Torchz , Erik Marks","year":2017,"date_label":"2017","publisher":"Isaac Ardis , Wei Tang , Fan Torchz , Erik Marks","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-695","source_label":"EIP 695","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2017 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"EIP 695, Create `eth_chainId` method for JSON-RPC. Include eth_chainId method in eth_-namespaced JSON-RPC methods.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-695","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-695","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-695","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0302","slug":"eip-706","title":"DEVp2p snappy compression","authors":"Péter Szilágyi","year":2017,"date_label":"2017","publisher":"Péter Szilágyi","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Storage and networks","topics":["Storage and networks"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-706","source_label":"EIP 706","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2017 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"EIP 706, DEVp2p snappy compression. The base networking protocol (DEVp2p) used by Ethereum currently does not employ any form of compression.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-706","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-706","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-706","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0303","slug":"eip-712","title":"Typed structured data hashing and signing","authors":"Remco Bloemen , Leonid Logvinov , Jacob Evans","year":2017,"date_label":"2017","publisher":"Remco Bloemen , Leonid Logvinov , Jacob Evans","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-712","source_label":"EIP 712","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2017 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"EIP 712, Typed structured data hashing and signing. This is a standard for hashing and signing of typed structured data as opposed to just bytestrings.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-712","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-712","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-712","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0304","slug":"eip-747","title":"wallet_watchAsset RPC Method","authors":"Dan Finlay , Esteban Mino , Gavin John","year":2018,"date_label":"2018","publisher":"Dan Finlay , Esteban Mino , Gavin John","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-747","source_label":"EIP 747","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2018 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"EIP 747, wallet_watchAsset RPC Method. This EIP standardizes a new wallet-scoped RPC method, wallet_watchAsset, to allow a client to suggest a token for the user's wallet to track.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-747","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-747","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-747","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0305","slug":"eip-1052","title":"EXTCODEHASH opcode","authors":"Nick Johnson , Paweł Bylica","year":2018,"date_label":"2018","publisher":"Nick Johnson , Paweł Bylica","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-1052","source_label":"EIP 1052","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2018 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"EIP 1052, EXTCODEHASH opcode. A new opcode, which returns the keccak256 hash of a contract's code.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-1052","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-1052","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-1052","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0306","slug":"eip-1108","title":"Reduce alt_bn128 precompile gas costs","authors":"Antonio Salazar Cardozo , Zachary Williamson","year":2018,"date_label":"2018","publisher":"Antonio Salazar Cardozo , Zachary Williamson","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-1108","source_label":"EIP 1108","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2018 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"EIP 1108, Reduce alt_bn128 precompile gas costs. The elliptic curve arithmetic precompiles are currently overpriced.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-1108","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-1108","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-1108","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0307","slug":"eip-1153","title":"Transient storage opcodes","authors":"Alexey Akhunov , Moody Salem","year":2018,"date_label":"2018","publisher":"Alexey Akhunov , Moody Salem","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-1153","source_label":"EIP 1153","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2018 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"EIP 1153, Transient storage opcodes. This proposal introduces transient storage opcodes, which manipulate state that behaves identically to storage, except that transient storage is discarded after every transaction, and TSTORE is not subject to the gas stipend check as defined in EIP-2200.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-1153","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-1153","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-1153","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0308","slug":"eip-1193","title":"Ethereum Provider JavaScript API","authors":"Fabian Vogelsteller , Ryan Ghods , Victor Maia , Marc Garreau , Erik Marks","year":2018,"date_label":"2018","publisher":"Fabian Vogelsteller , Ryan Ghods , Victor Maia , Marc Garreau , Erik Marks","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Storage and networks","topics":["Storage and networks"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-1193","source_label":"EIP 1193","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2018 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"EIP 1193, Ethereum Provider JavaScript API. A common convention in the Ethereum web application (\"dapp\") ecosystem is for key management software (\"wallets\") to expose their API via a JavaScript object in the web page.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-1193","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-1193","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-1193","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0309","slug":"eip-1283","title":"Net gas metering for SSTORE without dirty maps","authors":"Wei Tang","year":2018,"date_label":"2018","publisher":"Wei Tang","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-1283","source_label":"EIP 1283","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2018 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"EIP 1283, Net gas metering for SSTORE without dirty maps. Net gas metering changes for SSTORE opcode, enabling new usages for contract storage, and reducing excessive gas costs where it doesn't match how most implementations work.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-1283","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-1283","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-1283","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0310","slug":"eip-1344","title":"ChainID opcode","authors":"Richard Meissner , Bryant Eisenbach","year":2018,"date_label":"2018","publisher":"Richard Meissner , Bryant Eisenbach","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-1344","source_label":"EIP 1344","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2018 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"EIP 1344, ChainID opcode. An opcode that returns the current chain's EIP-155 unique identifier.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-1344","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-1344","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-1344","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0311","slug":"eip-1884","title":"Repricing for trie-size-dependent opcodes","authors":"Martin Holst Swende","year":2019,"date_label":"2019","publisher":"Martin Holst Swende","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-1884","source_label":"EIP 1884","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2019 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"EIP 1884, Repricing for trie-size-dependent opcodes. Repricing certain opcodes, to obtain a good balance between gas expenditure and resource consumption.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-1884","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-1884","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-1884","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0312","slug":"eip-1898","title":"Add `blockHash` to defaultBlock methods","authors":"Charles Cooper","year":2019,"date_label":"2019","publisher":"Charles Cooper","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-1898","source_label":"EIP 1898","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2019 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"EIP 1898, Add `blockHash` to defaultBlock methods. For JSON-RPC methods which currently accept a default block parameter, additionally allow the parameter to be a block hash.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-1898","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-1898","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-1898","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0313","slug":"eip-2028","title":"Transaction data gas cost reduction","authors":"Alexey Akhunov , Eli Ben Sasson , Tom Brand , Louis Guthmann , Avihu Levy","year":2019,"date_label":"2019","publisher":"Alexey Akhunov , Eli Ben Sasson , Tom Brand , Louis Guthmann , Avihu Levy","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-2028","source_label":"EIP 2028","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2019 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"EIP 2028, Transaction data gas cost reduction. We propose to reduce the gas cost of Calldata (GTXDATANONZERO) from its current value of 68 gas per byte to 16 gas per byte, to be backed by mathematical modeling and empirical estimates.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-2028","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-2028","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-2028","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0314","slug":"eip-2124","title":"Fork identifier for chain compatibility checks","authors":"Péter Szilágyi , Felix Lange","year":2019,"date_label":"2019","publisher":"Péter Szilágyi , Felix Lange","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Storage and networks","topics":["Storage and networks"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-2124","source_label":"EIP 2124","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2019 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"EIP 2124, Fork identifier for chain compatibility checks. Currently nodes in the Ethereum network try to find each other by establishing random connections to remote machines \"looking\" like an Ethereum node (public networks, private networks, test networks, etc), hoping that they found a useful peer (same genesis, same forks).","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-2124","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-2124","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-2124","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0315","slug":"eip-2159","title":"Common Prometheus Metrics Names for Clients","authors":"Adrian Sutton","year":2019,"date_label":"2019","publisher":"Adrian Sutton","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-2159","source_label":"EIP 2159","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2019 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"EIP 2159, Common Prometheus Metrics Names for Clients. Standardized names of common metrics for Ethereum clients to use with Prometheus, a widely used monitoring and alerting solution.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-2159","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-2159","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-2159","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0316","slug":"eip-2200","title":"Structured Definitions for Net Gas Metering","authors":"Wei Tang","year":2019,"date_label":"2019","publisher":"Wei Tang","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-2200","source_label":"EIP 2200","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2019 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"EIP 2200, Structured Definitions for Net Gas Metering. It's a combined version of [EIP-1283] and [EIP-1706], with a structured definition so as to make it interoperable with other gas changes such as [EIP-1884].","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-2200","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-2200","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-2200","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0317","slug":"eip-2228","title":"Canonicalize the name of network ID 1 and chain ID 1","authors":"William Entriken","year":2019,"date_label":"2019","publisher":"William Entriken","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-2228","source_label":"EIP 2228","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2019 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"EIP 2228, Canonicalize the name of network ID 1 and chain ID 1. The Ethereum network with network ID 1 and chain ID 1 is named Ethereum Mainnet.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-2228","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-2228","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-2228","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0318","slug":"eip-2255","title":"Wallet Permissions System","authors":"Dan Finlay , Erik Marks , Gavin John","year":2019,"date_label":"2019","publisher":"Dan Finlay , Erik Marks , Gavin John","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-2255","source_label":"EIP 2255","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2019 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"EIP 2255, Wallet Permissions System. Two new wallet-namespaced RPC endpoints, wallet_getPermissions and wallet_requestPermissions, providing a standard interface for requesting and checking permissions.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-2255","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-2255","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-2255","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0319","slug":"eip-2364","title":"eth/64: forkid-extended protocol handshake","authors":"Péter Szilágyi , Péter Szilágyi , Tim Beiko","year":2019,"date_label":"2019","publisher":"Péter Szilágyi , Péter Szilágyi , Tim Beiko","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-2364","source_label":"EIP 2364","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2019 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"EIP 2364, eth/64: forkid-extended protocol handshake. The inclusion of the forkid, originally defined in (EIP-2124), as a new field in the Ethereum wire protocol (eth) handshake.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-2364","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-2364","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-2364","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0320","slug":"eip-2464","title":"eth/65: transaction announcements and retrievals","authors":"Péter Szilágyi , Péter Szilágyi , Gary Rong , Tim Beiko","year":2020,"date_label":"2020","publisher":"Péter Szilágyi , Péter Szilágyi , Gary Rong , Tim Beiko","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Storage and networks","topics":["Storage and networks"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-2464","source_label":"EIP 2464","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2020 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"EIP 2464, eth/65: transaction announcements and retrievals. Three additional message types into the eth protocol (releasing a new version, eth/65): NewPooledTransactionHashes (0x08) to announce a set of transactions without their content; GetPooledTransactions (0x09) to request a batch of transactions by their announced hash; and PooledTransactions (0x0a) to reply to a transaction request.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-2464","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-2464","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-2464","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0321","slug":"eip-2481","title":"eth/66 request identifier","authors":"Christoph Burgdorf","year":2020,"date_label":"2020","publisher":"Christoph Burgdorf","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Storage and networks","topics":["Storage and networks"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-2481","source_label":"EIP 2481","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2020 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"EIP 2481, eth/66 request identifier. The eth protocol defines various request and response commands that are used to exchange data between Ethereum nodes.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-2481","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-2481","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-2481","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0322","slug":"eip-2537","title":"Precompile for BLS12-381 curve operations","authors":"Alex Vlasov , Kelly Olson , Alex Stokes , Antonio Sanso","year":2020,"date_label":"2020","publisher":"Alex Vlasov , Kelly Olson , Alex Stokes , Antonio Sanso","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-2537","source_label":"EIP 2537","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2020 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"EIP 2537, Precompile for BLS12-381 curve operations. Add functionality to efficiently perform operations over the BLS12-381 curve, including those for BLS signature verification.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-2537","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-2537","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-2537","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0323","slug":"eip-2565","title":"ModExp Gas Cost","authors":"Kelly Olson , Sean Gulley , Simon Peffers , Justin Drake , Dankrad Feist","year":2020,"date_label":"2020","publisher":"Kelly Olson , Sean Gulley , Simon Peffers , Justin Drake , Dankrad Feist","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-2565","source_label":"EIP 2565","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2020 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"EIP 2565, ModExp Gas Cost. Defines the gas cost of the ModExp (0x00..05) precompile.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-2565","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-2565","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-2565","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0324","slug":"eip-2681","title":"Limit account nonce to 2^64-1","authors":"Alex Beregszaszi","year":2020,"date_label":"2020","publisher":"Alex Beregszaszi","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-2681","source_label":"EIP 2681","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2020 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"EIP 2681, Limit account nonce to 2^64-1. Account nonces are currently specified to be arbitrarily long unsigned integers.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-2681","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-2681","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-2681","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0325","slug":"eip-2696","title":"JavaScript `request` method RPC transport","authors":"Micah Zoltu , Erik Marks","year":2020,"date_label":"2020","publisher":"Micah Zoltu , Erik Marks","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Storage and networks","topics":["Storage and networks"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-2696","source_label":"EIP 2696","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2020 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"EIP 2696, JavaScript `request` method RPC transport. A standard for remote procedure calls between an Ethereum Provider and an Ethereum Client when both are able to interface with each other via a shared JavaScript object.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-2696","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-2696","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-2696","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0326","slug":"eip-2700","title":"JavaScript Provider Event Emitter","authors":"Micah Zoltu , Erik Marks","year":2020,"date_label":"2020","publisher":"Micah Zoltu , Erik Marks","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-2700","source_label":"EIP 2700","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2020 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"EIP 2700, JavaScript Provider Event Emitter. A standard mechanism for JavaScript Ethereum Providers to notify clients about chain state changes when both are able to interface with each other via a shared JavaScript object.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-2700","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-2700","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-2700","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0327","slug":"eip-2718","title":"Typed Transaction Envelope","authors":"Micah Zoltu","year":2020,"date_label":"2020","publisher":"Micah Zoltu","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-2718","source_label":"EIP 2718","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2020 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"EIP 2718, Typed Transaction Envelope. TransactionType || TransactionPayload is a valid transaction and TransactionType || ReceiptPayload is a valid transaction receipt where TransactionType identifies the format of the transaction and Payload is the transaction/receipt contents, which are defined in future EIPs.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-2718","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-2718","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-2718","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0328","slug":"eip-2929","title":"Gas cost increases for state access opcodes","authors":"Vitalik Buterin , Martin Swende","year":2020,"date_label":"2020","publisher":"Vitalik Buterin , Martin Swende","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-2929","source_label":"EIP 2929","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2020 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"EIP 2929, Gas cost increases for state access opcodes. Increases gas cost for SLOAD, CALL, BALANCE, EXT and SELFDESTRUCT when used for the first time in a transaction.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-2929","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-2929","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-2929","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0329","slug":"eip-2930","title":"Optional access lists","authors":"Vitalik Buterin , Martin Swende","year":2020,"date_label":"2020","publisher":"Vitalik Buterin , Martin Swende","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-2930","source_label":"EIP 2930","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2020 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"EIP 2930, Optional access lists. Adds a transaction type which contains an access list, a list of addresses and storage keys that the transaction plans to access.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-2930","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-2930","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-2930","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0330","slug":"eip-2935","title":"Serve historical block hashes from state","authors":"Vitalik Buterin , Tomasz Stanczak , Guillaume Ballet , Gajinder Singh , Tanishq Jasoria , Ignacio Hagopian , Jochem Brouwer , Sina Mahmoodi","year":2020,"date_label":"2020","publisher":"Vitalik Buterin , Tomasz Stanczak , Guillaume Ballet , Gajinder Singh , Tanishq Jasoria , Ignacio Hagopian , Jochem Brouwer , Sina Mahmoodi","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-2935","source_label":"EIP 2935","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2020 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"EIP 2935, Serve historical block hashes from state. Store last HISTORY_SERVE_WINDOW historical block hashes in the storage of a system contract as part of the block processing logic.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-2935","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-2935","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-2935","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0331","slug":"eip-2976","title":"Typed Transactions over Gossip","authors":"Micah Zoltu","year":2020,"date_label":"2020","publisher":"Micah Zoltu","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Storage and networks","topics":["Storage and networks"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-2976","source_label":"EIP 2976","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2020 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"EIP 2976, Typed Transactions over Gossip. Typed Transactions can be sent over devp2p as TransactionType || TransactionPayload.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-2976","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-2976","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-2976","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0332","slug":"eip-2982","title":"Serenity Phase 0","authors":"Danny Ryan , Vitalik Buterin","year":2020,"date_label":"2020","publisher":"Danny Ryan , Vitalik Buterin","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-2982","source_label":"EIP 2982","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2020 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"EIP 2982, Serenity Phase 0. Phase 0 of Serenity (eth2), a multi-phased upgrade to the consensus mechanism for Ethereum mainnet.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-2982","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-2982","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-2982","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0333","slug":"eip-3198","title":"BASEFEE opcode","authors":"Abdelhamid Bakhta , Vitalik Buterin","year":2021,"date_label":"2021","publisher":"Abdelhamid Bakhta , Vitalik Buterin","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-3198","source_label":"EIP 3198","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2021 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"EIP 3198, BASEFEE opcode. Adds an opcode that gives the EVM access to the block's base fee.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-3198","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-3198","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-3198","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0334","slug":"eip-3529","title":"Reduction in refunds","authors":"Vitalik Buterin , Martin Swende","year":2021,"date_label":"2021","publisher":"Vitalik Buterin , Martin Swende","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-3529","source_label":"EIP 3529","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2021 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"EIP 3529, Reduction in refunds. Remove gas refunds for SELFDESTRUCT, and reduce gas refunds for SSTORE to a lower level where the refunds are still substantial, but they are no longer high enough for current \"exploits\" of the refund mechanism to be viable.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-3529","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-3529","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-3529","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0335","slug":"eip-3541","title":"Reject new contract code starting with the 0xEF byte","authors":"Alex Beregszaszi , Paweł Bylica , Andrei Maiboroda , Alexey Akhunov , Christian Reitwiessner , Martin Swende","year":2021,"date_label":"2021","publisher":"Alex Beregszaszi , Paweł Bylica , Andrei Maiboroda , Alexey Akhunov , Christian Reitwiessner , Martin Swende","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-3541","source_label":"EIP 3541","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2021 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"EIP 3541, Reject new contract code starting with the 0xEF byte. Disallow new code starting with the 0xEF byte to be deployed.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-3541","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-3541","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-3541","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0336","slug":"eip-3607","title":"Reject transactions from senders with deployed code","authors":"Dankrad Feist , Dmitry Khovratovich , Marius van der Wijden","year":2021,"date_label":"2021","publisher":"Dankrad Feist , Dmitry Khovratovich , Marius van der Wijden","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-3607","source_label":"EIP 3607","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2021 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"EIP 3607, Reject transactions from senders with deployed code. Ethereum addresses are currently only 160 bits long.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-3607","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-3607","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-3607","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0337","slug":"eip-3651","title":"Warm COINBASE","authors":"William Morriss","year":2021,"date_label":"2021","publisher":"William Morriss","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-3651","source_label":"EIP 3651","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2021 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"EIP 3651, Warm COINBASE. The COINBASE address shall be warm at the start of transaction execution, in accordance with the actual cost of reading that account.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-3651","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-3651","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-3651","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0338","slug":"eip-3675","title":"Upgrade consensus to Proof-of-Stake","authors":"Mikhail Kalinin , Danny Ryan , Vitalik Buterin","year":2021,"date_label":"2021","publisher":"Mikhail Kalinin , Danny Ryan , Vitalik Buterin","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-3675","source_label":"EIP 3675","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2021 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"EIP 3675, Upgrade consensus to Proof-of-Stake. This EIP deprecates Proof-of-Work (PoW) and supersedes it with the new Proof-of-Stake consensus mechanism (PoS) driven by the beacon chain.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-3675","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-3675","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-3675","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0339","slug":"eip-3855","title":"PUSH0 instruction","authors":"Alex Beregszaszi , Hugo De la cruz , Paweł Bylica","year":2021,"date_label":"2021","publisher":"Alex Beregszaszi , Hugo De la cruz , Paweł Bylica","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-3855","source_label":"EIP 3855","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2021 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"EIP 3855, PUSH0 instruction. Introduce the PUSH0 (0x5f) instruction, which pushes the constant value 0 onto the stack.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-3855","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-3855","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-3855","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0340","slug":"eip-3860","title":"Limit and meter initcode","authors":"Martin Holst Swende , Paweł Bylica , Alex Beregszaszi , Andrei Maiboroda","year":2021,"date_label":"2021","publisher":"Martin Holst Swende , Paweł Bylica , Alex Beregszaszi , Andrei Maiboroda","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-3860","source_label":"EIP 3860","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2021 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"EIP 3860, Limit and meter initcode. We extend EIP-170 by introducing a maximum size limit for initcode (MAX_INITCODE_SIZE = 2 MAX_CODE_SIZE = 49152).","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-3860","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-3860","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-3860","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0341","slug":"eip-4399","title":"Supplant DIFFICULTY opcode with PREVRANDAO","authors":"Mikhail Kalinin , Danny Ryan","year":2021,"date_label":"2021","publisher":"Mikhail Kalinin , Danny Ryan","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-4399","source_label":"EIP 4399","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2021 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"EIP 4399, Supplant DIFFICULTY opcode with PREVRANDAO. This EIP supplants the semantics of the return value of existing DIFFICULTY (0x44) opcode and renames the opcode to PREVRANDAO (0x44).","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-4399","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-4399","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-4399","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0342","slug":"eip-4736","title":"Consensus Layer Withdrawal Protection","authors":"Benjamin Chodroff , Jim McDonald","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Benjamin Chodroff , Jim McDonald","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-4736","source_label":"EIP 4736","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"EIP 4736, Consensus Layer Withdrawal Protection. If a consensus layer mnemonic phrase is compromised, it is impossible for the consensus layer network to differentiate the legitimate holder of the key from an illegitimate holder.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-4736","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-4736","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-4736","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0343","slug":"eip-4788","title":"Beacon block root in the EVM","authors":"Alex Stokes , Ansgar Dietrichs , Danny Ryan , Martin Holst Swende , lightclient","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Alex Stokes , Ansgar Dietrichs , Danny Ryan , Martin Holst Swende , lightclient","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Interoperability","topics":["Interoperability"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-4788","source_label":"EIP 4788","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"EIP 4788, Beacon block root in the EVM. Commit to the hash tree root of each beacon chain block in the corresponding execution payload header.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-4788","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-4788","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-4788","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0344","slug":"eip-4881","title":"Deposit Contract Snapshot Interface","authors":"Mark Mackey","year":2021,"date_label":"2021","publisher":"Mark Mackey","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-4881","source_label":"EIP 4881","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2021 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"EIP 4881, Deposit Contract Snapshot Interface. A standard format for transmitting the deposit contract Merkle tree in a compressed form during weak subjectivity sync.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-4881","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-4881","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-4881","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0345","slug":"eip-4895","title":"Beacon chain push withdrawals as operations","authors":"Alex Stokes , Danny Ryan","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Alex Stokes , Danny Ryan","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-4895","source_label":"EIP 4895","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"EIP 4895, Beacon chain push withdrawals as operations. Introduce a system-level \"operation\" to support validator withdrawals that are \"pushed\" from the beacon chain to the EVM.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-4895","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-4895","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-4895","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0346","slug":"eip-4938","title":"eth/67 - Removal of GetNodeData","authors":"Marius van der Wijden , Felix Lange , Gary Rong","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Marius van der Wijden , Felix Lange , Gary Rong","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-4938","source_label":"EIP 4938","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"EIP 4938, eth/67 - Removal of GetNodeData. The Ethereum Wire Protocol defines request and response messages for exchanging data between clients.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-4938","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-4938","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-4938","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0347","slug":"eip-5656","title":"MCOPY - Memory copying instruction","authors":"Alex Beregszaszi , Paul Dworzanski , Jared Wasinger , Casey Detrio , Pawel Bylica , Charles Cooper","year":2021,"date_label":"2021","publisher":"Alex Beregszaszi , Paul Dworzanski , Jared Wasinger , Casey Detrio , Pawel Bylica , Charles Cooper","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-5656","source_label":"EIP 5656","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2021 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"EIP 5656, MCOPY - Memory copying instruction. Provide an efficient EVM instruction for copying memory areas.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-5656","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-5656","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-5656","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0348","slug":"eip-5749","title":"The 'window.evmproviders' object","authors":"Kosala Hemachandra","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Kosala Hemachandra","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-5749","source_label":"EIP 5749","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"EIP 5749, The 'window.evmproviders' object. A Javascript Ethereum Provider interface injection that will allow for the interoperability of multiple browser wallets at the same time.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-5749","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-5749","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-5749","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0349","slug":"eip-5792","title":"Wallet Call API","authors":"Moody Salem , Lukas Rosario , Wilson Cusack , Dror Tirosh , Jake Moxey , Derek Rein , Alex Forshtat , Sam Wilson , Borislav Itskov , Joao Tavares , Adam Fuller , Philip Liao , bumblefudge","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Moody Salem , Lukas Rosario , Wilson Cusack , Dror Tirosh , Jake Moxey , Derek Rein , Alex Forshtat , Sam Wilson , Borislav Itskov , Joao Tavares , Adam Fuller , Philip Liao , bumblefudge","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-5792","source_label":"EIP 5792","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"EIP 5792, Wallet Call API. Defines new JSON-RPC methods which enable apps to ask a wallet to process a batch of onchain write calls and to check on the status of those calls.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-5792","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-5792","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-5792","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0350","slug":"eip-5793","title":"eth/68 - Add tx type to tx announcement","authors":"Marius van der Wijden","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Marius van der Wijden","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-5793","source_label":"EIP 5793","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"EIP 5793, eth/68 - Add tx type to tx announcement. The Ethereum Wire Protocol defines request and response messages for exchanging data between clients.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-5793","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-5793","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-5793","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0351","slug":"eip-6110","title":"Supply validator deposits on chain","authors":"Mikhail Kalinin , Danny Ryan , Peter Davies","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Mikhail Kalinin , Danny Ryan , Peter Davies","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-6110","source_label":"EIP 6110","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"EIP 6110, Supply validator deposits on chain. Appends validator deposits to the Execution Layer block structure.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-6110","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-6110","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-6110","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0352","slug":"eip-6122","title":"Forkid checks based on timestamps","authors":"Marius van der Wijden","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Marius van der Wijden","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Storage and networks","topics":["Storage and networks"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-6122","source_label":"EIP 6122","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"EIP 6122, Forkid checks based on timestamps. EIP-2124 proposed a way of identifying nodes on the p2p network based on their chain configuration via the forkid parameter.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-6122","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-6122","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-6122","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0353","slug":"eip-6780","title":"SELFDESTRUCT only in same transaction","authors":"Guillaume Ballet , Vitalik Buterin , Dankrad Feist","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Guillaume Ballet , Vitalik Buterin , Dankrad Feist","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-6780","source_label":"EIP 6780","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"EIP 6780, SELFDESTRUCT only in same transaction. This EIP changes the functionality of the SELFDESTRUCT opcode.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-6780","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-6780","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-6780","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0354","slug":"eip-6916","title":"Automatically Reset Testnet","authors":"Mário Havel , pk910 , Rémy Roy , Holly Atkinson , Tereza Burianova","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Mário Havel , pk910 , Rémy Roy , Holly Atkinson , Tereza Burianova","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-6916","source_label":"EIP 6916","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"EIP 6916, Automatically Reset Testnet. A specification for an automatically reset testnet, a novel approach to testnets that can be implemented within Ethereum clients.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-6916","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-6916","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-6916","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0355","slug":"eip-6953","title":"Network Upgrade Activation Triggers","authors":"Tim Beiko","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Tim Beiko","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-6953","source_label":"EIP 6953","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"EIP 6953, Network Upgrade Activation Triggers. This EIP outlines the various network upgrade activation triggers used on Ethereum over time, from the proof-of-work era to the first post-merge network upgrade, Shanghai/Capella, across both the execution and consensus layers.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-6953","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-6953","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-6953","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0356","slug":"eip-6963","title":"Multi Injected Provider Discovery","authors":"Pedro Gomes , Kosala Hemachandra , Richard Moore , Gregory Markou , Kyle Den Hartog , Glitch , Jake Moxey , Pierre Bertet , Darryl Yeo , Yaroslav Sergievsky","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Pedro Gomes , Kosala Hemachandra , Richard Moore , Gregory Markou , Kyle Den Hartog , Glitch , Jake Moxey , Pierre Bertet , Darryl Yeo , Yaroslav Sergievsky","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Storage and networks","topics":["Storage and networks"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-6963","source_label":"EIP 6963","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"EIP 6963, Multi Injected Provider Discovery. An alternative discovery mechanism to window.ethereum for EIP-1193 providers which supports discovering multiple injected Wallet Providers in a web page using Javascript's window events.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-6963","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-6963","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-6963","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0357","slug":"eip-7002","title":"Execution layer triggerable withdrawals","authors":"Danny Ryan , Mikhail Kalinin , Ansgar Dietrichs , Hsiao-Wei Wang , lightclient , Felix Lange","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Danny Ryan , Mikhail Kalinin , Ansgar Dietrichs , Hsiao-Wei Wang , lightclient , Felix Lange","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-7002","source_label":"EIP 7002","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"EIP 7002, Execution layer triggerable withdrawals. Adds a new mechanism to allow validators to trigger withdrawals and exits from their execution layer (0x01) withdrawal credentials.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7002","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7002","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7002","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0358","slug":"eip-7044","title":"Perpetually Valid Signed Voluntary Exits","authors":"Lion","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Lion","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-7044","source_label":"EIP 7044","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"EIP 7044, Perpetually Valid Signed Voluntary Exits. Lock validator voluntary exit signature domain on Capella for perpetual validity.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7044","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7044","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7044","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0359","slug":"eip-7045","title":"Increase max attestation inclusion slot","authors":"Danny Ryan","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Danny Ryan","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-7045","source_label":"EIP 7045","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"EIP 7045, Increase max attestation inclusion slot. Increases max attestation inclusion slot from attestation.slot + SLOTS_PER_EPOCH to the last slot of epoch N+1 where N is the epoch containing the attestation slot.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7045","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7045","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7045","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0360","slug":"eip-7251","title":"Increase the MAX_EFFECTIVE_BALANCE","authors":"mike , Francesco , dapplion , Mikhail , Aditya , Justin , lightclient , Felix Lange","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"mike , Francesco , dapplion , Mikhail , Aditya , Justin , lightclient , Felix Lange","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-7251","source_label":"EIP 7251","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"EIP 7251, Increase the MAX_EFFECTIVE_BALANCE. Increases the constant MAX_EFFECTIVE_BALANCE, while keeping the minimum staking balance 32 ETH.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7251","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7251","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7251","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0361","slug":"eip-7514","title":"Add Max Epoch Churn Limit","authors":"dapplion , Tim Beiko","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"dapplion , Tim Beiko","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-7514","source_label":"EIP 7514","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"EIP 7514, Add Max Epoch Churn Limit. Update the maximum validator growth rate from an exponential to a linear increase by capping the epoch churn limit.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7514","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7514","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7514","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0362","slug":"eip-7516","title":"BLOBBASEFEE instruction","authors":"Carl Beekhuizen","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Carl Beekhuizen","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-7516","source_label":"EIP 7516","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"EIP 7516, BLOBBASEFEE instruction. Add a BLOBBASEFEE (0x4a) instruction that returns the value of the blob base-fee of the current block it is executing in.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7516","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7516","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7516","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0363","slug":"eip-7549","title":"Move committee index outside Attestation","authors":"dapplion , Mikhail Kalinin","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"dapplion , Mikhail Kalinin","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-7549","source_label":"EIP 7549","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"EIP 7549, Move committee index outside Attestation. Move the committee's index field outside of the signed Attestation message to allow aggregation of equal consensus votes.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7549","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7549","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7549","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0364","slug":"eip-7594","title":"PeerDAS - Peer Data Availability Sampling","authors":"Danny Ryan , Dankrad Feist , Francesco D'Amato , Hsiao-Wei Wang , Alex Stokes","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Danny Ryan , Dankrad Feist , Francesco D'Amato , Hsiao-Wei Wang , Alex Stokes","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-7594","source_label":"EIP 7594","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"EIP 7594, PeerDAS - Peer Data Availability Sampling. PeerDAS (Peer Data Availability Sampling) is a networking protocol that allows nodes to perform data availability sampling (DAS) to ensure that blob data has been made available while downloading only a subset of the data.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7594","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7594","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7594","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0365","slug":"eip-7623","title":"Increase calldata cost","authors":"Toni Wahrstätter , Vitalik Buterin","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Toni Wahrstätter , Vitalik Buterin","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-7623","source_label":"EIP 7623","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"EIP 7623, Increase calldata cost. The current calldata pricing permits EL payloads of up to 7.15 MB, while the average size is much smaller at around 100 KB.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7623","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7623","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7623","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0366","slug":"eip-7642","title":"eth/69 - history expiry and simpler receipts","authors":"Marius van der Wijden , Felix Lange , Ahmad Bitar","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Marius van der Wijden , Felix Lange , Ahmad Bitar","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Storage and networks","topics":["Storage and networks"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-7642","source_label":"EIP 7642","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"EIP 7642, eth/69 - history expiry and simpler receipts. This EIP modifies the 'eth' p2p protocol to announce the historical block range served by the node.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7642","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7642","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7642","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0367","slug":"eip-7685","title":"General purpose execution layer requests","authors":"lightclient , Felix Lange","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"lightclient , Felix Lange","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-7685","source_label":"EIP 7685","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"EIP 7685, General purpose execution layer requests. This proposal defines a general purpose framework for storing contract-triggered requests.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7685","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7685","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7685","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0368","slug":"eip-7691","title":"Blob throughput increase","authors":"Parithosh Jayanthi , Toni Wahrstätter , Sam Calder-Mason , Andrew Davis , Ansgar Dietrichs","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Parithosh Jayanthi , Toni Wahrstätter , Sam Calder-Mason , Andrew Davis , Ansgar Dietrichs","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-7691","source_label":"EIP 7691","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"EIP 7691, Blob throughput increase. Increases the number of blobs in a block to provide more scale to Ethereum via L2 solution that rely on L1 data capacity.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7691","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7691","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7691","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0369","slug":"eip-7823","title":"Set upper bounds for MODEXP","authors":"Alex Beregszaszi , Radoslaw Zagorowicz","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Alex Beregszaszi , Radoslaw Zagorowicz","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-7823","source_label":"EIP 7823","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"EIP 7823, Set upper bounds for MODEXP. Introduce an upper bound on the inputs of the MODEXP precompile.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7823","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7823","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7823","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0370","slug":"eip-7825","title":"Transaction Gas Limit Cap","authors":"Giulio Rebuffo , Toni Wahrstätter","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Giulio Rebuffo , Toni Wahrstätter","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-7825","source_label":"EIP 7825","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"EIP 7825, Transaction Gas Limit Cap. This proposal introduces a protocol-level cap on the maximum gas usage per transaction to 16,777,216 (2^24) gas.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7825","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7825","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7825","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0371","slug":"eip-7840","title":"Add blob schedule to EL config files","authors":"lightclient","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"lightclient","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-7840","source_label":"EIP 7840","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"EIP 7840, Add blob schedule to EL config files. Add a new object to client configuration files blobSchedule which lists the target blob count per block and max blob count per block for each fork.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7840","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7840","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7840","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0372","slug":"eip-7870","title":"Hardware and Bandwidth Recommendations","authors":"Parithosh Jayanthi , Kevaundray Wedderburn , Josh Rudolf , Dankrad Feist , Justin Traglia , Ignacio Hagopian , George Kadianakis , Fredrik Svantes , Carl Beekhuizen , Toni Wahrstätter","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Parithosh Jayanthi , Kevaundray Wedderburn , Josh Rudolf , Dankrad Feist , Justin Traglia , Ignacio Hagopian , George Kadianakis , Fredrik Svantes , Carl Beekhuizen , Toni Wahrstätter","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-7870","source_label":"EIP 7870","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"EIP 7870, Hardware and Bandwidth Recommendations. This proposal specifies hardware and bandwidth recommendations for different types of Ethereum nodes: - Full nodes: Nodes that follow the tip of the chain without necessarily proposing blocks.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7870","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7870","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7870","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0373","slug":"eip-7883","title":"ModExp Gas Cost Increase","authors":"Marcin Sobczak , Marek Moraczyński , Marcos Maceo","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Marcin Sobczak , Marek Moraczyński , Marcos Maceo","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-7883","source_label":"EIP 7883","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"EIP 7883, ModExp Gas Cost Increase. This EIP is modifying the ModExp precompile pricing algorithm introduced in EIP-2565.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7883","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7883","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7883","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0374","slug":"eip-7892","title":"Blob Parameter Only Hardforks","authors":"Mark Mackey , Raúl Kripalani","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Mark Mackey , Raúl Kripalani","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-7892","source_label":"EIP 7892","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"EIP 7892, Blob Parameter Only Hardforks. Blob Parameter Only (BPO) Hardforks, a lightweight mechanism for incrementally scaling Ethereum’s blob capacity through targeted hard forks that modify only blob-related parameters: target, max, and baseFeeUpdateFraction.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7892","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7892","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7892","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0375","slug":"eip-7910","title":"eth_config JSON-RPC Method","authors":"Danno Ferrin","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Danno Ferrin","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-7910","source_label":"EIP 7910","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"EIP 7910, eth_config JSON-RPC Method. This document describes an RPC method that provides node-relevant configuration data for the current, next, and last known forks.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7910","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7910","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7910","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0376","slug":"eip-7917","title":"Deterministic proposer lookahead","authors":"Lin Oshitani , Justin Drake","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Lin Oshitani , Justin Drake","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-7917","source_label":"EIP 7917","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"EIP 7917, Deterministic proposer lookahead. At the start of each epoch, pre-calculate and store in the beacon_state a deterministic proposer_lookahead for the next MIN_SEED_LOOKAHEAD + 1 epochs.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7917","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7917","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7917","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0377","slug":"eip-7918","title":"Blob base fee bounded by execution cost","authors":"Anders Elowsson , Ben Adams , Francesco D'Amato","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Anders Elowsson , Ben Adams , Francesco D'Amato","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-7918","source_label":"EIP 7918","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"EIP 7918, Blob base fee bounded by execution cost. This EIP assigns a reserve price BLOB_BASE_COST base_fee_per_gas to blobs by introducing an if-clause in calc_excess_blob_gas().","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7918","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7918","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7918","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0378","slug":"eip-7934","title":"RLP Execution Block Size Limit","authors":"Giulio Rebuffo , Ben Adams , Storm Slivkoff","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Giulio Rebuffo , Ben Adams , Storm Slivkoff","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-7934","source_label":"EIP 7934","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"EIP 7934, RLP Execution Block Size Limit. This proposal introduces a protocol-level cap on the maximum RLP-encoded execution block size to 10 megabytes (MiB), which includes a margin of 2 MiB to account for beacon block sizes.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7934","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7934","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7934","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0379","slug":"eip-7935","title":"Set default gas limit to 60M","authors":"Sophia Gold , Parithosh Jayanthi , Toni Wahrstätter , Carl Beekhuizen , Ansgar Dietrichs , Dankrad Feist , Alex Stokes , Josh Rudolph , Giulio Rebuffo , Storm Slivkoff , Kamil Chodoła","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Sophia Gold , Parithosh Jayanthi , Toni Wahrstätter , Carl Beekhuizen , Ansgar Dietrichs , Dankrad Feist , Alex Stokes , Josh Rudolph , Giulio Rebuffo , Storm Slivkoff , Kamil Chodoła","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-7935","source_label":"EIP 7935","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"EIP 7935, Set default gas limit to 60M. This should be significantly increased to 60M by the time Fusaka is released by execution layer clients updating their default configurations.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7935","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7935","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7935","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0380","slug":"eip-7939","title":"Count leading zeros (CLZ) opcode","authors":"Vectorized , Georgios Konstantopoulos , Jochem Brouwer , Ben Adams , Giulio Rebuffo","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Vectorized , Georgios Konstantopoulos , Jochem Brouwer , Ben Adams , Giulio Rebuffo","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-7939","source_label":"EIP 7939","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"EIP 7939, Count leading zeros (CLZ) opcode. Introduce a new opcode, CLZ(x), which pops x from the stack and pushes the number of leading zero bits in x to the stack.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7939","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7939","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7939","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0381","slug":"eip-7951","title":"Precompile for secp256r1 Curve Support","authors":"Carl Beekhuizen , Ulaş Erdoğan , Doğan Alpaslan","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Carl Beekhuizen , Ulaş Erdoğan , Doğan Alpaslan","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-7951","source_label":"EIP 7951","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"EIP 7951, Precompile for secp256r1 Curve Support. Add functionality to efficiently perform ECDSA signature verification over the secp256r1 elliptic curve (also known as P-256 or prime256v1).","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7951","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7951","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7951","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0382","slug":"erc-162","title":"Initial ENS Hash Registrar","authors":"Maurelian, Nick Johnson , Alex Van de Sande","year":2016,"date_label":"2016","publisher":"Maurelian, Nick Johnson , Alex Van de Sande","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-162","source_label":"ERC 162","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2016 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"ERC 162, Initial ENS Hash Registrar. The implementation, as deployed to the main ethereum network on 2017-05-04, of a registrar contract to govern the allocation of names in the Ethereum Name Service (ENS).","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-162","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-162","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-162","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0383","slug":"erc-165","title":"Standard Interface Detection","authors":"Christian Reitwießner , Nick Johnson , Fabian Vogelsteller , Jordi Baylina , Konrad Feldmeier , William Entriken","year":2018,"date_label":"2018","publisher":"Christian Reitwießner , Nick Johnson , Fabian Vogelsteller , Jordi Baylina , Konrad Feldmeier , William Entriken","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-165","source_label":"ERC 165","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2018 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"ERC 165, Standard Interface Detection. Creates a standard method to publish and detect what interfaces a smart contract implements.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-165","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-165","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-165","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0384","slug":"erc-173","title":"Contract Ownership Standard","authors":"Nick Mudge , Dan Finlay","year":2018,"date_label":"2018","publisher":"Nick Mudge , Dan Finlay","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-173","source_label":"ERC 173","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2018 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"ERC 173, Contract Ownership Standard. This specification defines standard functions for owning or controlling a contract.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-173","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-173","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-173","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0385","slug":"erc-191","title":"Signed Data Standard","authors":"Martin Holst Swende , Nick Johnson","year":2016,"date_label":"2016","publisher":"Martin Holst Swende , Nick Johnson","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-191","source_label":"ERC 191","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2016 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"ERC 191, Signed Data Standard. We propose the following format for signed_data 0x19 .","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-191","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-191","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-191","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0386","slug":"erc-223","title":"Token with transaction handling model","authors":"Dexaran","year":2017,"date_label":"2017","publisher":"Dexaran","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-223","source_label":"ERC 223","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2017 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"ERC 223, Token with transaction handling model. The following describes an interface and logic for fungible tokens that supports a tokenReceived callback to notify contract recipients when tokens are received.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-223","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-223","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-223","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0387","slug":"erc-600","title":"Ethereum purpose allocation for Deterministic Wallets","authors":"Nick Johnson , Micah Zoltu","year":2017,"date_label":"2017","publisher":"Nick Johnson , Micah Zoltu","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-600","source_label":"ERC 600","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2017 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"ERC 600, Ethereum purpose allocation for Deterministic Wallets. A logical hierarchy for deterministic wallets based on BIP32, the purpose scheme defined in BIP43 and this proposed change to BIP43.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-600","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-600","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-600","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0388","slug":"erc-601","title":"Ethereum hierarchy for deterministic wallets","authors":"Nick Johnson , Micah Zoltu","year":2017,"date_label":"2017","publisher":"Nick Johnson , Micah Zoltu","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-601","source_label":"ERC 601","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2017 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"ERC 601, Ethereum hierarchy for deterministic wallets. A logical hierarchy for deterministic wallets based on BIP32, the purpose scheme defined in BIP43 and eip-draft-ethereum-purpose.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-601","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-601","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-601","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0389","slug":"erc-681","title":"URL Format for Transaction Requests","authors":"Daniel A. Nagy","year":2017,"date_label":"2017","publisher":"Daniel A. Nagy","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-681","source_label":"ERC 681","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2017 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"ERC 681, URL Format for Transaction Requests. A standard way of representing various transactions, especially payment requests in ether and ERC-20 tokens as URLs.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-681","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-681","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-681","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0390","slug":"erc-777","title":"Token Standard","authors":"Jacques Dafflon , Jordi Baylina , Thomas Shababi","year":2017,"date_label":"2017","publisher":"Jacques Dafflon , Jordi Baylina , Thomas Shababi","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-777","source_label":"ERC 777","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2017 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"ERC 777, Token Standard. Standard interfaces and behaviors for token contracts.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-777","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-777","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-777","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0391","slug":"erc-820","title":"Pseudo-introspection Registry Contract","authors":"Jordi Baylina , Jacques Dafflon","year":2018,"date_label":"2018","publisher":"Jordi Baylina , Jacques Dafflon","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-820","source_label":"ERC 820","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2018 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"ERC 820, Pseudo-introspection Registry Contract. This standard defines a universal registry smart contract where any address (contract or regular account) can register which interface it supports and which smart contract is responsible for its implementation.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-820","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-820","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-820","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0392","slug":"erc-1046","title":"tokenURI Interoperability","authors":"Tommy Nicholas , Matt Russo , John Zettler , Matt Condon , Gavin John","year":2018,"date_label":"2018","publisher":"Tommy Nicholas , Matt Russo , John Zettler , Matt Condon , Gavin John","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-1046","source_label":"ERC 1046","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2018 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"ERC 1046, tokenURI Interoperability. ERC-721 introduced a tokenURI function for non-fungible tokens to handle miscellaneous metadata such as: - thumbnail image - title - description - special asset properties - etc.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-1046","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-1046","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-1046","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0393","slug":"erc-1167","title":"Minimal Proxy Contract","authors":"Peter Murray , Nate Welch , Joe Messerman","year":2018,"date_label":"2018","publisher":"Peter Murray , Nate Welch , Joe Messerman","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-1167","source_label":"ERC 1167","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2018 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"ERC 1167, Minimal Proxy Contract. To simply and cheaply clone contract functionality in an immutable way, this standard specifies a minimal bytecode implementation that delegates all calls to a known, fixed address.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-1167","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-1167","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-1167","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0394","slug":"erc-1271","title":"Standard Signature Validation Method for Contracts","authors":"Francisco Giordano , Matt Condon , Philippe Castonguay , Amir Bandeali , Jorge Izquierdo , Bertrand Masius","year":2018,"date_label":"2018","publisher":"Francisco Giordano , Matt Condon , Philippe Castonguay , Amir Bandeali , Jorge Izquierdo , Bertrand Masius","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-1271","source_label":"ERC 1271","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2018 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"ERC 1271, Standard Signature Validation Method for Contracts. Externally Owned Accounts (EOA) can sign messages with their associated private keys, but currently contracts cannot.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-1271","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-1271","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-1271","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0395","slug":"erc-1328","title":"WalletConnect URI Format","authors":"ligi , Pedro Gomes","year":2018,"date_label":"2018","publisher":"ligi , Pedro Gomes","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Interoperability","topics":["Interoperability"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-1328","source_label":"ERC 1328","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2018 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"ERC 1328, WalletConnect URI Format. This standard defines how the data to connect some application and a wallet can be encoded with a URI.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-1328","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-1328","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-1328","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0396","slug":"erc-1363","title":"Payable Token","authors":"Vittorio Minacori","year":2018,"date_label":"2018","publisher":"Vittorio Minacori","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-1363","source_label":"ERC 1363","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2018 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"ERC 1363, Payable Token. Defines a token interface for ERC-20 tokens that supports executing recipient code after transfer or transferFrom, or spender code after approve.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-1363","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-1363","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-1363","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0397","slug":"erc-1450","title":"RTA-Controlled Security Token","authors":"Howard Marks , Devender Gollapally , Joe Mathews , Jordan Jahja , John Shiple , David Zhang","year":2018,"date_label":"2018","publisher":"Howard Marks , Devender Gollapally , Joe Mathews , Jordan Jahja , John Shiple , David Zhang","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-1450","source_label":"ERC 1450","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2018 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"ERC 1450, RTA-Controlled Security Token. ERC-1450 facilitates the recording of ownership and transfer of securities sold in compliance with Securities Act Regulations CF, D, and A.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-1450","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-1450","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-1450","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0398","slug":"erc-1820","title":"Pseudo-introspection Registry Contract","authors":"Jordi Baylina , Jacques Dafflon","year":2019,"date_label":"2019","publisher":"Jordi Baylina , Jacques Dafflon","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-1820","source_label":"ERC 1820","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2019 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"ERC 1820, Pseudo-introspection Registry Contract. This standard defines a universal registry smart contract where any address (contract or regular account) can register which interface it supports and which smart contract is responsible for its implementation.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-1820","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-1820","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-1820","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0399","slug":"erc-1967","title":"Proxy Storage Slots","authors":"Santiago Palladino , Francisco Giordano , Hadrien Croubois","year":2019,"date_label":"2019","publisher":"Santiago Palladino , Francisco Giordano , Hadrien Croubois","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-1967","source_label":"ERC 1967","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2019 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"ERC 1967, Proxy Storage Slots. Delegating proxy contracts are widely used for both upgradeability and gas savings.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-1967","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-1967","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-1967","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0400","slug":"erc-2098","title":"Compact Signature Representation","authors":"Richard Moore , Nick Johnson","year":2019,"date_label":"2019","publisher":"Richard Moore , Nick Johnson","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-2098","source_label":"ERC 2098","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2019 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"ERC 2098, Compact Signature Representation. The secp256k1 curve permits the computation of the public key of signed digest when coupled with a signature, which is used implicitly to establish the origin of a transaction from an Externally Owned Account as well as on-chain in EVM contracts for example, in meta-transactions and multi-sig contracts.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-2098","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-2098","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-2098","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0401","slug":"erc-2135","title":"Consumable Interface (Tickets, etc)","authors":"Zainan Victor Zhou","year":2019,"date_label":"2019","publisher":"Zainan Victor Zhou","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-2135","source_label":"ERC 2135","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2019 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"ERC 2135, Consumable Interface (Tickets, etc). An interface to mark a digital asset as \"consumable\" and to react to its \"consumption.\" Digital assets sometimes need to be consumed.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-2135","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-2135","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-2135","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0402","slug":"erc-2309","title":"ERC-721 Consecutive Transfer Extension","authors":"Sean Papanikolas","year":2019,"date_label":"2019","publisher":"Sean Papanikolas","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-2309","source_label":"ERC 2309","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2019 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"ERC 2309, ERC-721 Consecutive Transfer Extension. A standardized event emitted when creating/transferring one, or many non-fungible tokens using consecutive token identifiers.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-2309","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-2309","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-2309","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0403","slug":"erc-2535","title":"Diamonds, Multi-Facet Proxy","authors":"Nick Mudge","year":2020,"date_label":"2020","publisher":"Nick Mudge","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-2535","source_label":"ERC 2535","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2020 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"ERC 2535, Diamonds, Multi-Facet Proxy. This proposal standardizes diamonds, which are modular smart contract systems that can be upgraded/extended after deployment, and have virtually no size limit.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-2535","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-2535","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-2535","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0404","slug":"erc-2612","title":"Permit Extension for EIP-20 Signed Approvals","authors":"Martin Lundfall","year":2020,"date_label":"2020","publisher":"Martin Lundfall","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-2612","source_label":"ERC 2612","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2020 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"ERC 2612, Permit Extension for EIP-20 Signed Approvals. Arguably one of the main reasons for the success of EIP-20 tokens lies in the interplay between approve and transferFrom, which allows for tokens to not only be transferred between externally owned accounts (EOA), but to be used in other contracts under application specific conditions by abstracting away msg.sender as the defining mechanism for token access control.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-2612","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-2612","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-2612","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0405","slug":"erc-2678","title":"Revised Ethereum Smart Contract Packaging Standard (EthPM v3)","authors":"g. nicholas d’andrea , Piper Merriam , Nick Gheorghita , Christian Reitwiessner , Ben Hauser , Bryant Eisenbach","year":2020,"date_label":"2020","publisher":"g. nicholas d’andrea , Piper Merriam , Nick Gheorghita , Christian Reitwiessner , Ben Hauser , Bryant Eisenbach","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-2678","source_label":"ERC 2678","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2020 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"ERC 2678, Revised Ethereum Smart Contract Packaging Standard (EthPM v3). A data format describing a smart contract software package.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-2678","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-2678","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-2678","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0406","slug":"erc-2771","title":"Secure Protocol for Native Meta Transactions","authors":"Ronan Sandford , Liraz Siri , Dror Tirosh , Yoav Weiss , Alex Forshtat , Hadrien Croubois , Sachin Tomar , Patrick McCorry , Nicolas Venturo , Fabian Vogelsteller , Gavin John","year":2020,"date_label":"2020","publisher":"Ronan Sandford , Liraz Siri , Dror Tirosh , Yoav Weiss , Alex Forshtat , Hadrien Croubois , Sachin Tomar , Patrick McCorry , Nicolas Venturo , Fabian Vogelsteller , Gavin John","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-2771","source_label":"ERC 2771","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2020 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"ERC 2771, Secure Protocol for Native Meta Transactions. A contract-level protocol for Recipient contracts to accept meta-transactions through trusted Forwarder contracts.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-2771","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-2771","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-2771","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0407","slug":"erc-2981","title":"NFT Royalty Standard","authors":"Zach Burks , James Morgan , Blaine Malone , James Seibel","year":2020,"date_label":"2020","publisher":"Zach Burks , James Morgan , Blaine Malone , James Seibel","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-2981","source_label":"ERC 2981","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2020 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"ERC 2981, NFT Royalty Standard. A standardized way to retrieve royalty payment information for non-fungible tokens (NFTs) to enable universal support for royalty payments across all NFT marketplaces and ecosystem participants.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-2981","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-2981","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-2981","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0408","slug":"erc-3448","title":"MetaProxy Standard","authors":"pinkiebell","year":2021,"date_label":"2021","publisher":"pinkiebell","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Storage and networks","topics":["Storage and networks"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-3448","source_label":"ERC 3448","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2021 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"ERC 3448, MetaProxy Standard. By standardizing on a known minimal bytecode proxy implementation with support for immutable metadata, this standard allows users and third party tools (e.g.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-3448","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-3448","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-3448","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0409","slug":"erc-3475","title":"Abstract Storage Bonds","authors":"Yu Liu , Varun Deshpande , Cedric Ngakam , Dhruv Malik , Samuel Gwlanold Edoumou , Toufic Batrice","year":2021,"date_label":"2021","publisher":"Yu Liu , Varun Deshpande , Cedric Ngakam , Dhruv Malik , Samuel Gwlanold Edoumou , Toufic Batrice","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-3475","source_label":"ERC 3475","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2021 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"ERC 3475, Abstract Storage Bonds. The creation of tokenized obligations with abstract on-chain metadata storage.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-3475","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-3475","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-3475","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0410","slug":"erc-3525","title":"Semi-Fungible Token","authors":"Will Wang , Mike Meng , Yi Cai , Ryan Chow , Zhongxin Wu , AlvisDu","year":2020,"date_label":"2020","publisher":"Will Wang , Mike Meng , Yi Cai , Ryan Chow , Zhongxin Wu , AlvisDu","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-3525","source_label":"ERC 3525","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2020 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"ERC 3525, Semi-Fungible Token. The set of smart contract interfaces described in this document defines an ERC-721 compatible token standard.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-3525","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-3525","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-3525","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0411","slug":"erc-3643","title":"T-REX - Token for Regulated EXchanges","authors":"Joachim Lebrun , Tony Malghem , Kevin Thizy , Luc Falempin , Adam Boudjemaa","year":2021,"date_label":"2021","publisher":"Joachim Lebrun , Tony Malghem , Kevin Thizy , Luc Falempin , Adam Boudjemaa","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Storage and networks","topics":["Storage and networks"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-3643","source_label":"ERC 3643","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2021 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"ERC 3643, T-REX - Token for Regulated EXchanges. The T-REX token is an institutional grade security token standard.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-3643","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-3643","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-3643","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0412","slug":"erc-3668","title":"CCIP Read—Secure offchain data retrieval","authors":"Nick Johnson","year":2020,"date_label":"2020","publisher":"Nick Johnson","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-3668","source_label":"ERC 3668","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2020 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"ERC 3668, CCIP Read—Secure offchain data retrieval. Contracts wishing to support lookup of data from external sources may, instead of returning the data directly, revert using OffchainLookup(address sender, string[] urls, bytes callData, bytes4 callbackFunction, bytes extraData).","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-3668","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-3668","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-3668","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0413","slug":"erc-4337","title":"Account Abstraction Using Alt Mempool","authors":"Vitalik Buterin , Yoav Weiss , Dror Tirosh , Shahaf Nacson , Alex Forshtat , Kristof Gazso , Tjaden Hess","year":2021,"date_label":"2021","publisher":"Vitalik Buterin , Yoav Weiss , Dror Tirosh , Shahaf Nacson , Alex Forshtat , Kristof Gazso , Tjaden Hess","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-4337","source_label":"ERC 4337","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2021 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"ERC 4337, Account Abstraction Using Alt Mempool. Historically, users could interact with Ethereum only by sending transactions from special accounts controlled by private keys, with transaction validation entirely enforced by fixed protocol rules.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-4337","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-4337","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-4337","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0414","slug":"erc-4361","title":"Sign-In with Ethereum","authors":"Wayne Chang , Gregory Rocco , Brantly Millegan , Nick Johnson , Oliver Terbu","year":2021,"date_label":"2021","publisher":"Wayne Chang , Gregory Rocco , Brantly Millegan , Nick Johnson , Oliver Terbu","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-4361","source_label":"ERC 4361","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2021 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"ERC 4361, Sign-In with Ethereum. Sign-In with Ethereum describes how Ethereum accounts authenticate with off-chain services by signing a standard message format parameterized by scope, session details, and security mechanisms (e.g., a nonce).","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-4361","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-4361","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-4361","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0415","slug":"erc-4400","title":"EIP-721 Consumable Extension","authors":"Daniel Ivanov , George Spasov","year":2021,"date_label":"2021","publisher":"Daniel Ivanov , George Spasov","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-4400","source_label":"ERC 4400","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2021 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"ERC 4400, EIP-721 Consumable Extension. This specification defines standard functions outlining a consumer role for instance(s) of EIP-721.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-4400","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-4400","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-4400","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0416","slug":"erc-4519","title":"Non-Fungible Tokens Tied to Physical Assets","authors":"Javier Arcenegui , Rosario Arjona , Roberto Román , Iluminada Baturone","year":2021,"date_label":"2021","publisher":"Javier Arcenegui , Rosario Arjona , Roberto Román , Iluminada Baturone","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-4519","source_label":"ERC 4519","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2021 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"ERC 4519, Non-Fungible Tokens Tied to Physical Assets. This EIP standardizes an interface for non-fungible tokens representing physical assets, such as Internet of Things (IoT) devices.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-4519","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-4519","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-4519","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0417","slug":"erc-4804","title":"Web3 URL to EVM Call Message Translation","authors":"Qi Zhou , Chao Pi , Sam Wilson","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Qi Zhou , Chao Pi , Sam Wilson","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-4804","source_label":"ERC 4804","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"ERC 4804, Web3 URL to EVM Call Message Translation. This standard translates an RFC 2396 URI like web3://uniswap.eth/ to an EVM message such as: EVMMessage { To: 0xaabbccddee....","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-4804","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-4804","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-4804","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0418","slug":"erc-4834","title":"Hierarchical Domains","authors":"Gavin John","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Gavin John","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-4834","source_label":"ERC 4834","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"ERC 4834, Hierarchical Domains. This is a standard for generic name resolution with arbitrarily complex access control and resolution.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-4834","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-4834","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-4834","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0419","slug":"erc-4906","title":"EIP-721 Metadata Update Extension","authors":"Anders , Lance , Shrug , Nathan","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Anders , Lance , Shrug , Nathan","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-4906","source_label":"ERC 4906","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"ERC 4906, EIP-721 Metadata Update Extension. Many EIP-721 contracts emit an event when one of its tokens' metadata are changed.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-4906","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-4906","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-4906","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0420","slug":"erc-4907","title":"Rental NFT, an Extension of EIP-721","authors":"Anders , Lance , Shrug","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Anders , Lance , Shrug","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-4907","source_label":"ERC 4907","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"ERC 4907, Rental NFT, an Extension of EIP-721. It proposes an additional role (user) which can be granted to addresses, and a time where the role is automatically revoked (expires).","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-4907","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-4907","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-4907","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0421","slug":"erc-4910","title":"Royalty Bearing NFTs","authors":"Andreas Freund","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Andreas Freund","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-4910","source_label":"ERC 4910","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"ERC 4910, Royalty Bearing NFTs. The proposal directly connects NFTs and royalties in a smart contract architecture extending the ERC-721 standard, with the aim of precluding central authorities from manipulating or circumventing payments to those who are legally entitled to them.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-4910","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-4910","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-4910","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0422","slug":"erc-4955","title":"Vendor Metadata Extension for NFTs","authors":"Ignacio Mazzara","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Ignacio Mazzara","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-4955","source_label":"ERC 4955","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"ERC 4955, Vendor Metadata Extension for NFTs. This EIP standardizes a schema for NFTs metadata to add new field namespaces to the JSON schema for EIP-721 and EIP-1155 NFTs.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-4955","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-4955","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-4955","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0423","slug":"erc-5006","title":"Rental NFT, NFT User Extension","authors":"Lance , Anders , Shrug","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Lance , Anders , Shrug","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-5006","source_label":"ERC 5006","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"ERC 5006, Rental NFT, NFT User Extension. It proposes an additional role (user) which can be granted to addresses that represent a user of the assets rather than an owner.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5006","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-5006","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5006","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0424","slug":"erc-5007","title":"Time NFT, ERC-721 Time Extension","authors":"Anders , Lance , Shrug","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Anders , Lance , Shrug","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-5007","source_label":"ERC 5007","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"ERC 5007, Time NFT, ERC-721 Time Extension. It proposes some additional functions (startTime, endTime) to help with on-chain time management.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5007","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-5007","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5007","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0425","slug":"erc-5023","title":"Shareable Non-Fungible Token","authors":"Jarno Marttila , Martin Moravek","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Jarno Marttila , Martin Moravek","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-5023","source_label":"ERC 5023","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"ERC 5023, Shareable Non-Fungible Token. This EIP standardizes an interface for non-fungible value-holding shareable tokens.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5023","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-5023","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5023","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0426","slug":"erc-5169","title":"Client Script URI for Token Contracts","authors":"James , Weiwu","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"James , Weiwu","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-5169","source_label":"ERC 5169","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"ERC 5169, Client Script URI for Token Contracts. This EIP provides a contract interface adding a scriptURI() function for locating executable scripts associated with the token.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5169","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-5169","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5169","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0427","slug":"erc-5192","title":"Minimal Soulbound NFTs","authors":"Tim Daubenschütz , Anders","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Tim Daubenschütz , Anders","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-5192","source_label":"ERC 5192","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"ERC 5192, Minimal Soulbound NFTs. It proposes a minimal interface to make tokens soulbound using the feature detection functionality of EIP-165.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5192","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-5192","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5192","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0428","slug":"erc-5202","title":"Blueprint contract format","authors":"Charles Cooper , Edward Amor","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Charles Cooper , Edward Amor","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-5202","source_label":"ERC 5202","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"ERC 5202, Blueprint contract format. Define a standard for \"blueprint\" contracts, or contracts which represent initcode that is stored on-chain.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5202","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-5202","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5202","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0429","slug":"erc-5219","title":"Contract Resource Requests","authors":"Gavin John","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Gavin John","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-5219","source_label":"ERC 5219","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"ERC 5219, Contract Resource Requests. This EIP standardizes an interface to make resource requests to smart contracts and to receive HTTP-like responses.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5219","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-5219","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5219","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0430","slug":"erc-5267","title":"Retrieval of EIP-712 domain","authors":"Francisco Giordano","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Francisco Giordano","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-5267","source_label":"ERC 5267","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"ERC 5267, Retrieval of EIP-712 domain. This EIP complements EIP-712 by standardizing how contracts should publish the fields and values that describe their domain.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5267","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-5267","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5267","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0431","slug":"erc-5313","title":"Light Contract Ownership","authors":"William Entriken","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"William Entriken","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-5313","source_label":"ERC 5313","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"ERC 5313, Light Contract Ownership. This specification defines the minimum interface required to identify an account that controls a contract.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5313","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-5313","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5313","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0432","slug":"erc-5375","title":"NFT Author Information and Consent","authors":"Samuele Marro , Luca Donno","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Samuele Marro , Luca Donno","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-5375","source_label":"ERC 5375","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"ERC 5375, NFT Author Information and Consent. This EIP standardizes a JSON format for storing off-chain information about NFT authors.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5375","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-5375","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5375","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0433","slug":"erc-5380","title":"ERC-721 Entitlement Extension","authors":"Gavin John , Tim Daubenschütz","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Gavin John , Tim Daubenschütz","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-5380","source_label":"ERC 5380","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"ERC 5380, ERC-721 Entitlement Extension. A new interface that allows ERC-721 token owners to grant limited usage of those tokens to other addresses.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5380","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-5380","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5380","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0434","slug":"erc-5484","title":"Consensual Soulbound Tokens","authors":"Buzz Cai","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Buzz Cai","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-5484","source_label":"ERC 5484","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"ERC 5484, Consensual Soulbound Tokens. An interface extending EIP-721 to create soulbound tokens.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5484","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-5484","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5484","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0435","slug":"erc-5489","title":"NFT Hyperlink Extension","authors":"IronMan_CH","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"IronMan_CH","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-5489","source_label":"ERC 5489","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"ERC 5489, NFT Hyperlink Extension. A new extension for NFTs (non-fungible token, aka EIP-721): nft-hyperlink-extention (hNFT), embedding NFTs with hyperlinks, referred to as “hNFTs”.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5489","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-5489","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5489","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0436","slug":"erc-5507","title":"Refundable Tokens","authors":"elie222 , Gavin John","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"elie222 , Gavin John","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-5507","source_label":"ERC 5507","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"ERC 5507, Refundable Tokens. Refund functionality for initial token offerings to ERC-20, ERC-721, and ERC-1155.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5507","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-5507","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5507","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0437","slug":"erc-5516","title":"Soulbound Multi-owner Tokens","authors":"Lucas Martín Grasso Ramos , Matias Arazi","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Lucas Martín Grasso Ramos , Matias Arazi","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-5516","source_label":"ERC 5516","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"ERC 5516, Soulbound Multi-owner Tokens. A standard interface for non-transferable, multi-owner Soulbound tokens.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5516","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-5516","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5516","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0438","slug":"erc-5521","title":"Referable NFT","authors":"Saber Yu , Qin Wang , Shange Fu , Yilin Sai , Shiping Chen , Sherry Xu , Jiangshan Yu","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Saber Yu , Qin Wang , Shange Fu , Yilin Sai , Shiping Chen , Sherry Xu , Jiangshan Yu","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-5521","source_label":"ERC 5521","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"ERC 5521, Referable NFT. It proposes two referable indicators, referring and referred, and a time-based indicator createdTimestamp.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5521","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-5521","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5521","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0439","slug":"erc-5528","title":"Refundable Fungible Token","authors":"StartfundInc","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"StartfundInc","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-5528","source_label":"ERC 5528","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"ERC 5528, Refundable Fungible Token. This specification defines a type of escrow service with the following flow: - The seller issues tokens.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5528","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-5528","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5528","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0440","slug":"erc-5564","title":"Stealth Addresses","authors":"Toni Wahrstätter , Matt Solomon , Ben DiFrancesco , Vitalik Buterin","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Toni Wahrstätter , Matt Solomon , Ben DiFrancesco , Vitalik Buterin","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-5564","source_label":"ERC 5564","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"ERC 5564, Stealth Addresses. This specification establishes a standardized method for interacting with stealth addresses, which allow senders of transactions or transfers to non-interactively generate private accounts exclusively accessible by their recipients.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5564","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-5564","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5564","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0441","slug":"erc-5570","title":"Digital Receipt Non-Fungible Tokens","authors":"Sean Darcy","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Sean Darcy","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-5570","source_label":"ERC 5570","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"ERC 5570, Digital Receipt Non-Fungible Tokens. A standard schema for digital receipts of transactions.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5570","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-5570","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5570","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0442","slug":"erc-5585","title":"ERC-721 NFT Authorization","authors":"Veega Labs , Sean NG , Tiger , Fred , Fov Cao","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Veega Labs , Sean NG , Tiger , Fred , Fov Cao","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-5585","source_label":"ERC 5585","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"ERC 5585, ERC-721 NFT Authorization. This EIP separates the ERC-721 NFT's commercial usage rights from its ownership to allow for the independent management of those rights.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5585","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-5585","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5585","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0443","slug":"erc-5606","title":"Multiverse NFTs","authors":"Gaurang Torvekar , Khemraj Adhawade , Nikhil Asrani","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Gaurang Torvekar , Khemraj Adhawade , Nikhil Asrani","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-5606","source_label":"ERC 5606","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"ERC 5606, Multiverse NFTs. This specification defines a minimal interface to create a multiverse NFT standard for digital assets such as wearables and in-game items that, in turn, index the delegate NFTs on each platform where this asset exists.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5606","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-5606","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5606","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0444","slug":"erc-5615","title":"ERC-1155 Supply Extension","authors":"Gavin John","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Gavin John","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Storage and networks","topics":["Storage and networks"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-5615","source_label":"ERC 5615","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"ERC 5615, ERC-1155 Supply Extension. This ERC standardizes an existing mechanism to fetch token supply data from ERC-1155 tokens.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5615","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-5615","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5615","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0445","slug":"erc-5625","title":"NFT Metadata JSON Schema dStorage Extension","authors":"Gavin Fu , Leo Wang , Bova Chen , Guang Han , Brian Wu","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Gavin Fu , Leo Wang , Bova Chen , Guang Han , Brian Wu","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-5625","source_label":"ERC 5625","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"ERC 5625, NFT Metadata JSON Schema dStorage Extension. This EIP extends the NFT metadata JSON schema defined in EIP-721 and EIP-1155, adding a dStorage key that provides information about how the NFT data is stored.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5625","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-5625","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5625","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0446","slug":"erc-5646","title":"Token State Fingerprint","authors":"Naim Ashhab","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Naim Ashhab","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-5646","source_label":"ERC 5646","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"ERC 5646, Token State Fingerprint. This specification defines the minimum interface required to unambiguously identify the state of a mutable token without knowledge of implementation details.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5646","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-5646","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5646","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0447","slug":"erc-5679","title":"Token Minting and Burning","authors":"Zainan Victor Zhou","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Zainan Victor Zhou","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-5679","source_label":"ERC 5679","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"ERC 5679, Token Minting and Burning. A consistent way to extend token standards for minting and burning.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5679","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-5679","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5679","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0448","slug":"erc-5725","title":"Transferable Vesting NFT","authors":"Apeguru , Marco De Vries , Mario , DeFiFoFum , Elliott Green","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Apeguru , Marco De Vries , Mario , DeFiFoFum , Elliott Green","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-5725","source_label":"ERC 5725","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"ERC 5725, Transferable Vesting NFT. A Non-Fungible Token (NFT) standard used to vest tokens (ERC-20 or otherwise) over a vesting release curve.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5725","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-5725","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5725","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0449","slug":"erc-5732","title":"Commit Interface","authors":"Zainan Victor Zhou , Matt Stam","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Zainan Victor Zhou , Matt Stam","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-5732","source_label":"ERC 5732","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"ERC 5732, Commit Interface. A simple commit interface to support commit-reveal scheme which provides only a commit method but no reveal method, allowing implementations to integrate this interface with arbitrary reveal methods such as vote or transfer.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5732","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-5732","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5732","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0450","slug":"erc-5750","title":"General Extensibility for Method Behaviors","authors":"Zainan Victor Zhou","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Zainan Victor Zhou","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-5750","source_label":"ERC 5750","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"ERC 5750, General Extensibility for Method Behaviors. This EIP standardizes the passing of unstructured call data to functions to enable future extensibility.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5750","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-5750","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5750","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0451","slug":"erc-5773","title":"Context-Dependent Multi-Asset Tokens","authors":"Bruno Škvorc , Cicada , Steven Pineda , Stevan Bogosavljevic , Jan Turk","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Bruno Škvorc , Cicada , Steven Pineda , Stevan Bogosavljevic , Jan Turk","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-5773","source_label":"ERC 5773","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"ERC 5773, Context-Dependent Multi-Asset Tokens. The Multi-Asset NFT standard allows for the construction of a new primitive: context-dependent output of information per single NFT.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5773","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-5773","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-5773","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0452","slug":"erc-6059","title":"Parent-Governed Nestable Non-Fungible Tokens","authors":"Bruno Škvorc , Cicada , Steven Pineda , Stevan Bogosavljevic , Jan Turk","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Bruno Škvorc , Cicada , Steven Pineda , Stevan Bogosavljevic , Jan Turk","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Credit and stable value","topics":["Credit and stable value"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-6059","source_label":"ERC 6059","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"ERC 6059, Parent-Governed Nestable Non-Fungible Tokens. The Parent-Governed Nestable NFT standard extends ERC-721 by allowing for a new inter-NFT relationship and interaction.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-6059","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-6059","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-6059","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0453","slug":"erc-6066","title":"Signature Validation Method for NFTs","authors":"Jack Boyuan Xu","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Jack Boyuan Xu","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-6066","source_label":"ERC 6066","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"ERC 6066, Signature Validation Method for NFTs. While Externally Owned Accounts can validate signed messages with ecrecover() and smart contracts can validate signatures using specifications outlined in ERC-1271, currently there is no standard method to create or validate signatures made by NFTs.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-6066","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-6066","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-6066","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0454","slug":"erc-6093","title":"Custom errors for commonly-used tokens","authors":"Ernesto García , Francisco Giordano , Hadrien Croubois","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Ernesto García , Francisco Giordano , Hadrien Croubois","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-6093","source_label":"ERC 6093","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"ERC 6093, Custom errors for commonly-used tokens. A standard set of custom errors for commonly-used tokens, which are defined as ERC-20, ERC-721, and ERC-1155 tokens.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-6093","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-6093","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-6093","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0455","slug":"erc-6105","title":"No Intermediary NFT Trading Protocol","authors":"5660-eth , Silvere Heraudeau , Martin McConnell , Abu , Wizard Wang","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"5660-eth , Silvere Heraudeau , Martin McConnell , Abu , Wizard Wang","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-6105","source_label":"ERC 6105","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"ERC 6105, No Intermediary NFT Trading Protocol. A marketplace functionality to ERC-721 to enable non-fungible token trading without relying on an intermediary trading platform.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-6105","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-6105","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-6105","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0456","slug":"erc-6147","title":"Guard of NFT/SBT, an Extension of ERC-721","authors":"5660-eth , Wizard Wang","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"5660-eth , Wizard Wang","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Credit and stable value","topics":["Credit and stable value"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-6147","source_label":"ERC 6147","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"ERC 6147, Guard of NFT/SBT, an Extension of ERC-721. It separates the holding right and transfer right of non-fungible tokens (NFTs) and Soulbound Tokens (SBTs) and defines a new role, guard with expires.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-6147","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-6147","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-6147","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0457","slug":"erc-6150","title":"Hierarchical NFTs","authors":"Keegan Lee , msfew , Kartin , qizhou","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Keegan Lee , msfew , Kartin , qizhou","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-6150","source_label":"ERC 6150","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"ERC 6150, Hierarchical NFTs. It proposes a multi-layer filesystem-like hierarchical NFTs.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-6150","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-6150","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-6150","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0458","slug":"erc-6220","title":"Composable NFTs utilizing Equippable Parts","authors":"Bruno Škvorc , Cicada , Steven Pineda , Stevan Bogosavljevic , Jan Turk","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Bruno Škvorc , Cicada , Steven Pineda , Stevan Bogosavljevic , Jan Turk","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-6220","source_label":"ERC 6220","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"ERC 6220, Composable NFTs utilizing Equippable Parts. The Composable NFTs utilizing equippable parts standard extends ERC-721 by allowing the NFTs to selectively add parts to themselves via equipping.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-6220","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-6220","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-6220","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0459","slug":"erc-6239","title":"Semantic Soulbound Tokens","authors":"Jessica Chang","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Jessica Chang","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-6239","source_label":"ERC 6239","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"ERC 6239, Semantic Soulbound Tokens. This proposal extends ERC-721 and ERC-5192 by introducing Resource Description Framework (RDF) triples to Soulbound Tokens' (‘SBTs‘) metadata.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-6239","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-6239","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-6239","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0460","slug":"erc-6381","title":"Public Non-Fungible Token Emote Repository","authors":"Bruno Škvorc , Steven Pineda , Stevan Bogosavljevic , Jan Turk","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Bruno Škvorc , Steven Pineda , Stevan Bogosavljevic , Jan Turk","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-6381","source_label":"ERC 6381","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"ERC 6381, Public Non-Fungible Token Emote Repository. The Public Non-Fungible Token Emote Repository standard provides an enhanced interactive utility for ERC-721 and ERC-1155 by allowing NFTs to be emoted at.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-6381","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-6381","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-6381","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0461","slug":"erc-6454","title":"Minimal Transferable NFT detection interface","authors":"Bruno Škvorc , Francesco Sullo , Steven Pineda , Stevan Bogosavljevic , Jan Turk","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Bruno Škvorc , Francesco Sullo , Steven Pineda , Stevan Bogosavljevic , Jan Turk","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-6454","source_label":"ERC 6454","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"ERC 6454, Minimal Transferable NFT detection interface. The Minimalistic Transferable interface for Non-Fungible Tokens standard extends ERC-721 by introducing the ability to identify whether an NFT can be transferred or not.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-6454","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-6454","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-6454","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0462","slug":"erc-6492","title":"Signature Validation for Predeploy Contracts","authors":"Ivo Georgiev , Agustin Aguilar","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Ivo Georgiev , Agustin Aguilar","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-6492","source_label":"ERC 6492","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"ERC 6492, Signature Validation for Predeploy Contracts. Contracts can sign verifiable messages via ERC-1271.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-6492","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-6492","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-6492","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0463","slug":"erc-6538","title":"Stealth Meta-Address Registry","authors":"Matt Solomon , Toni Wahrstätter , Ben DiFrancesco , Vitalik Buterin , Gary Ghayrat","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Matt Solomon , Toni Wahrstätter , Ben DiFrancesco , Vitalik Buterin , Gary Ghayrat","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-6538","source_label":"ERC 6538","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"ERC 6538, Stealth Meta-Address Registry. This specification defines a standardized way of storing and retrieving an entity's stealth meta-address, by extending ERC-5564.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-6538","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-6538","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-6538","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0464","slug":"erc-6672","title":"Multi-redeemable NFTs","authors":"RE:DREAMER Lab , Archie Chang , Kai Yu , Yonathan Randyanto , Boyu Chu , Boxi Li , Jason Cheng","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"RE:DREAMER Lab , Archie Chang , Kai Yu , Yonathan Randyanto , Boyu Chu , Boxi Li , Jason Cheng","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-6672","source_label":"ERC 6672","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"ERC 6672, Multi-redeemable NFTs. An extension to the ERC-721 standard for Non-Fungible Tokens (NFTs) to enable multi-redeemable NFTs.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-6672","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-6672","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-6672","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0465","slug":"erc-6808","title":"Fungible Key Bound Token","authors":"Mihai Onila , Nick Zeman , Narcis Cotaie","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Mihai Onila , Nick Zeman , Narcis Cotaie","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-6808","source_label":"ERC 6808","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"ERC 6808, Fungible Key Bound Token. A standard interface for Fungible Key Bound Tokens (FKBT/s), a subset of the more general Key Bound Tokens (KBT/s).","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-6808","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-6808","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-6808","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0466","slug":"erc-6809","title":"Non-Fungible Key Bound Token","authors":"Mihai Onila , Nick Zeman , Narcis Cotaie","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Mihai Onila , Nick Zeman , Narcis Cotaie","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-6809","source_label":"ERC 6809","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"ERC 6809, Non-Fungible Key Bound Token. A standard interface for Non-Fungible Key Bound Tokens (NFKBT/s), a subset of the more general Key Bound Tokens (KBT/s).","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-6809","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-6809","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-6809","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0467","slug":"erc-6909","title":"Minimal Multi-Token Interface","authors":"JT Riley , Dillon , Sara , Vectorized , Neodaoist","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"JT Riley , Dillon , Sara , Vectorized , Neodaoist","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-6909","source_label":"ERC 6909","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"ERC 6909, Minimal Multi-Token Interface. The following specifies a multi-token contract as a simplified alternative to the ERC-1155 Multi-Token Standard.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-6909","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-6909","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-6909","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0468","slug":"erc-6982","title":"Efficient Default Lockable Tokens","authors":"Francesco Sullo , Alexe Spataru","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Francesco Sullo , Alexe Spataru","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-6982","source_label":"ERC 6982","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"ERC 6982, Efficient Default Lockable Tokens. This proposal introduces a lockable interface for ERC-721 tokens that optimizes gas usage by eliminating unnecessary events.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-6982","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-6982","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-6982","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0469","slug":"erc-7007","title":"Verifiable AI-Generated Content Token","authors":"Cathie So , Xiaohang Yu , Conway , Lee Ting Ting , Kartin","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Cathie So , Xiaohang Yu , Conway , Lee Ting Ting , Kartin","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-7007","source_label":"ERC 7007","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"ERC 7007, Verifiable AI-Generated Content Token. The verifiable AI-generated content (AIGC) non-fungible token (NFT) standard is an extension of the ERC-721 token standard for AIGC.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7007","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7007","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7007","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0470","slug":"erc-7053","title":"Interoperable Digital Media Indexing","authors":"Bofu Chen , Tammy Yang","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Bofu Chen , Tammy Yang","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-7053","source_label":"ERC 7053","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"ERC 7053, Interoperable Digital Media Indexing. An interoperable indexing strategy designed to enhance the organization and retrieval of digital media information across multiple smart contracts and EVM-compatible blockchains.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7053","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7053","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7053","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0471","slug":"erc-7066","title":"Lockable Extension for ERC-721","authors":"Piyush Chittara , StreamNFT , Srinivas Joshi","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Piyush Chittara , StreamNFT , Srinivas Joshi","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-7066","source_label":"ERC 7066","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"ERC 7066, Lockable Extension for ERC-721. An extension of ERC-721, this standard incorporates locking features into NFTs, allowing for various uses while preventing sale or transfer.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7066","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7066","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7066","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0472","slug":"erc-7092","title":"Financial Bonds","authors":"Samuel Gwlanold Edoumou","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Samuel Gwlanold Edoumou","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-7092","source_label":"ERC 7092","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"ERC 7092, Financial Bonds. This proposal introduces fixed-income financial bonds with key characteristics defined to facilitate bond issuance in the primary market and enable buying or selling bonds in the secondary market.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7092","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7092","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7092","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0473","slug":"erc-7160","title":"ERC-721 Multi-Metadata Extension","authors":"0xG , Marco Peyfuss","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"0xG , Marco Peyfuss","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-7160","source_label":"ERC 7160","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"ERC 7160, ERC-721 Multi-Metadata Extension. An extension to the ERC-721 standard to support multiple metadata URIs per token.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7160","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7160","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7160","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0474","slug":"erc-7201","title":"Namespaced Storage Layout","authors":"Francisco Giordano , Hadrien Croubois , Ernesto García , Eric Lau","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Francisco Giordano , Hadrien Croubois , Ernesto García , Eric Lau","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-7201","source_label":"ERC 7201","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"ERC 7201, Namespaced Storage Layout. We define the NatSpec annotation @custom:storage-location to document storage namespaces and their location in storage in Solidity or Vyper source code.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7201","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7201","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7201","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0475","slug":"erc-7208","title":"On-Chain Data Containers","authors":"Rachid Ajaja , Matthijs de Vries , Alexandros Athanasopulos , Pavel Rubin , Sebastian Galimberti Romano , Daniel Berbesi , Apostolos Mavropoulos , Barbara Marcano , Daniel Ortega","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Rachid Ajaja , Matthijs de Vries , Alexandros Athanasopulos , Pavel Rubin , Sebastian Galimberti Romano , Daniel Berbesi , Apostolos Mavropoulos , Barbara Marcano , Daniel Ortega","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-7208","source_label":"ERC 7208","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"ERC 7208, On-Chain Data Containers. A series of interfaces for the abstraction of storage of on-chain data by implementing the logic functions that govern such data on independent smart contracts.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7208","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7208","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7208","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0476","slug":"erc-7231","title":"Identity-aggregated NFT","authors":"Chloe Gu , Navid X. , Victor Yu , Archer H.","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Chloe Gu , Navid X. , Victor Yu , Archer H.","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-7231","source_label":"ERC 7231","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"ERC 7231, Identity-aggregated NFT. This standard extends ERC-721 by binding individuals' Web2 and Web3 identities to non-fungible tokens (NFTs) and soulbound tokens (SBTs).","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7231","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7231","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7231","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0477","slug":"erc-7291","title":"Purpose bound money","authors":"Orchid-Dev , Victor Liew , Wong Tse Jian , Jacob Shan , Chin Sin Ong , Praveen Kumar","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Orchid-Dev , Victor Liew , Wong Tse Jian , Jacob Shan , Chin Sin Ong , Praveen Kumar","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Credit and stable value","topics":["Credit and stable value"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-7291","source_label":"ERC 7291","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"ERC 7291, Purpose bound money. A Purpose Bound Money (PBM) token is a wrapper around an ERC-1155 token that can be used for a limited activity.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7291","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7291","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7291","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0478","slug":"erc-7401","title":"Parent-Governed Non-Fungible Tokens Nesting","authors":"Bruno Škvorc , Cicada , Steven Pineda , Stevan Bogosavljevic , Jan Turk","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Bruno Škvorc , Cicada , Steven Pineda , Stevan Bogosavljevic , Jan Turk","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-7401","source_label":"ERC 7401","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"ERC 7401, Parent-Governed Non-Fungible Tokens Nesting. ❗️ The Parent-Governed NFT Nesting standard extends ERC-721 by allowing for a new inter-NFT relationship and interaction.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7401","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7401","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7401","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0479","slug":"erc-7409","title":"Public Non-Fungible Tokens Emote Repository","authors":"Bruno Škvorc , Steven Pineda , Stevan Bogosavljevic , Jan Turk","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Bruno Škvorc , Steven Pineda , Stevan Bogosavljevic , Jan Turk","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-7409","source_label":"ERC 7409","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"ERC 7409, Public Non-Fungible Tokens Emote Repository. ❗️ The Public Non-Fungible Tokens Emote Repository standard provides an enhanced interactive utility for ERC-721 and ERC-1155 by allowing NFTs to be emoted at.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7409","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7409","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7409","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0480","slug":"erc-7432","title":"Non-Fungible Token Roles","authors":"Ernani São Thiago , Daniel Lima","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Ernani São Thiago , Daniel Lima","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-7432","source_label":"ERC 7432","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"ERC 7432, Non-Fungible Token Roles. This standard introduces role management for NFTs.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7432","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7432","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7432","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0481","slug":"erc-7439","title":"Prevent ticket touting","authors":"LeadBest Consulting Group , Sandy Sung , Mars Peng , Taien Wang","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"LeadBest Consulting Group , Sandy Sung , Mars Peng , Taien Wang","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-7439","source_label":"ERC 7439","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"ERC 7439, Prevent ticket touting. This standard is an extension of ERC-721 and defines standard functions outlining a scope for ticketing agents or event organizers to take preventative actions to stop audiences being exploited in the ticket scalping market and allow customers to resell their tickets via authorized ticket resellers.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7439","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7439","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7439","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0482","slug":"erc-7528","title":"ETH (Native Asset) Address Convention","authors":"Joey Santoro","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Joey Santoro","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Credit and stable value","topics":["Credit and stable value"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-7528","source_label":"ERC 7528","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"ERC 7528, ETH (Native Asset) Address Convention. The following standard proposes a convention for using the address 0xeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee in all contexts where an address is used to represent ETH in the same capacity as an ERC-20 token.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7528","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7528","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7528","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0483","slug":"erc-7535","title":"Native Asset ERC-4626 Tokenized Vault","authors":"Joey Santoro","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Joey Santoro","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Credit and stable value","topics":["Credit and stable value"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-7535","source_label":"ERC 7535","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"ERC 7535, Native Asset ERC-4626 Tokenized Vault. This standard is an extension of the ERC-4626 spec with an identical interface and behavioral overrides for handling Ether or any native asset as the underlying.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7535","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7535","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7535","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0484","slug":"erc-7540","title":"Asynchronous ERC-4626 Tokenized Vaults","authors":"Jeroen Offerijns , Alina Sinelnikova , Vikram Arun , Joey Santoro , Farhaan Ali , João Martins","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Jeroen Offerijns , Alina Sinelnikova , Vikram Arun , Joey Santoro , Farhaan Ali , João Martins","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Credit and stable value","topics":["Credit and stable value"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-7540","source_label":"ERC 7540","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"ERC 7540, Asynchronous ERC-4626 Tokenized Vaults. The following standard extends ERC-4626 by adding support for asynchronous deposit and redemption flows.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7540","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7540","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7540","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0485","slug":"erc-7575","title":"Multi-Asset ERC-4626 Vaults","authors":"Jeroen Offerijns , Alina Sinelnikova , Vikram Arun , Joey Santoro , Farhaan Ali","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Jeroen Offerijns , Alina Sinelnikova , Vikram Arun , Joey Santoro , Farhaan Ali","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Credit and stable value","topics":["Credit and stable value"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-7575","source_label":"ERC 7575","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"ERC 7575, Multi-Asset ERC-4626 Vaults. The following standard adapts ERC-4626 to support multiple assets or entry points for the same share token.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7575","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7575","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7575","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0486","slug":"erc-7578","title":"Physical Asset Redemption","authors":"Lee Vidor , David Tan , Lee Smith , Gabriel Stoica","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Lee Vidor , David Tan , Lee Smith , Gabriel Stoica","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-7578","source_label":"ERC 7578","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"ERC 7578, Physical Asset Redemption. This proposal is an extension of ERC-721 and implements additional functionality and information pertaining to the NFT’s underlying physical asset by capturing information that enables the holder of physical asset backed NFTs to verify authenticity and facilitate redemption of the underlying physical assets.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7578","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7578","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7578","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0487","slug":"erc-7588","title":"Blob Transactions Metadata JSON Schema","authors":"Gavin Fu , Leo Wang , Bova Chen , Aiden X","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Gavin Fu , Leo Wang , Bova Chen , Aiden X","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-7588","source_label":"ERC 7588","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"ERC 7588, Blob Transactions Metadata JSON Schema. A standard for attaching metadata to blobs carried by blob transactions, as outlined in EIP-4844.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7588","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7588","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7588","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0488","slug":"erc-7627","title":"Secure Messaging Protocol","authors":"Chen Liaoyuan","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Chen Liaoyuan","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-7627","source_label":"ERC 7627","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"ERC 7627, Secure Messaging Protocol. This proposal implements the capability to securely exchange encrypted messages on-chain.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7627","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7627","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7627","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0489","slug":"erc-7631","title":"Dual Nature Token Pair","authors":"vectorized , Thomas , Quit , Michael Amadi , cygaar , Harrison","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"vectorized , Thomas , Quit , Michael Amadi , cygaar , Harrison","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-7631","source_label":"ERC 7631","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"ERC 7631, Dual Nature Token Pair. A fungible ERC-20 token contract and non-fungible ERC-721 token contract can be interlinked, allowing actions performed on one contract to be reflected on the other.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7631","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7631","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7631","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0490","slug":"erc-7634","title":"Limited Transfer Count NFT","authors":"Qin Wang , Saber Yu , Shiping Chen","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Qin Wang , Saber Yu , Shiping Chen","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-7634","source_label":"ERC 7634","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"ERC 7634, Limited Transfer Count NFT. This standard extends ERC-721 with a mechanism that lets token owners/minters cap how many times a specific token can be transferred.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7634","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7634","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7634","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0491","slug":"erc-7656","title":"Generalized Contract-Linked Services","authors":"Francesco Sullo","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Francesco Sullo","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-7656","source_label":"ERC 7656","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"ERC 7656, Generalized Contract-Linked Services. This proposal defines a factory capable of deploying generic services linked to specific contracts, such as ERC-4337 accounts or ERC-721 tokens (NFTs).","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7656","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7656","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7656","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0492","slug":"erc-7734","title":"Decentralized Identity Verification (DID)","authors":"Anushka Yadav","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Anushka Yadav","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-7734","source_label":"ERC 7734","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"ERC 7734, Decentralized Identity Verification (DID). This proposal introduces a standard for decentralized identity verification (DID) on the blockchain.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7734","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7734","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7734","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0493","slug":"erc-7743","title":"Multi-Owner Non-Fungible Tokens (MO-NFT)","authors":"Cheng Qian","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Cheng Qian","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-7743","source_label":"ERC 7743","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"ERC 7743, Multi-Owner Non-Fungible Tokens (MO-NFT). A new standard for non-fungible tokens (NFTs) that supports multiple owners.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7743","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7743","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7743","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0494","slug":"erc-7751","title":"Wrapping of bubbled up reverts","authors":"Daniel Gretzke , Sara Reynolds , Alice Henshaw , Marko Veniger , Hadrien Croubois","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Daniel Gretzke , Sara Reynolds , Alice Henshaw , Marko Veniger , Hadrien Croubois","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-7751","source_label":"ERC 7751","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"ERC 7751, Wrapping of bubbled up reverts. A standard for handling bubbled up reverts in Ethereum smart contracts using a dedicated custom error.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7751","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7751","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7751","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0495","slug":"erc-7786","title":"Cross-Chain Messaging Gateway","authors":"Francisco Giordano , Hadrien Croubois , Ernesto García , CJ Cobb , Sergey Gorbunov , joxes","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Francisco Giordano , Hadrien Croubois , Ernesto García , CJ Cobb , Sergey Gorbunov , joxes","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Interoperability","topics":["Interoperability"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-7786","source_label":"ERC 7786","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"ERC 7786, Cross-Chain Messaging Gateway. This proposal describes an interface, and the corresponding workflow, for smart contracts to send arbitrary data through cross-chain messaging protocols.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7786","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7786","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7786","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0496","slug":"erc-7813","title":"Store, Table-Based Introspectable Storage","authors":"alvarius , dk1a , frolic , ludens , vdrg , yonada","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"alvarius , dk1a , frolic , ludens , vdrg , yonada","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-7813","source_label":"ERC 7813","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"ERC 7813, Store, Table-Based Introspectable Storage. This standard introduces a flexible on-chain storage pattern that organizes data into structured tables that consist of records with fixed key and value schemas, similar to a traditional database.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7813","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7813","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7813","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0497","slug":"erc-7818","title":"Expirable ERC-20","authors":"sirawt , ADISAKBOONMARK","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"sirawt , ADISAKBOONMARK","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Storage and networks","topics":["Storage and networks"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-7818","source_label":"ERC 7818","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"ERC 7818, Expirable ERC-20. Introduces an extension for ERC-20 tokens, which facilitates the implementation of an expiration mechanism.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7818","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7818","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7818","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0498","slug":"erc-7820","title":"Access Control Registry","authors":"Shubham Khandelwal , Anushka Yadav","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Shubham Khandelwal , Anushka Yadav","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-7820","source_label":"ERC 7820","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"ERC 7820, Access Control Registry. The Access Control Registry (ACR) standard defines a universal interface for managing role-based access control across multiple smart contracts.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7820","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7820","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7820","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0499","slug":"erc-7837","title":"Diffusive Tokens","authors":"Cheng Qian","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Cheng Qian","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-7837","source_label":"ERC 7837","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"ERC 7837, Diffusive Tokens. A standard for a new type of fungible token, called Diffusive Tokens (DIFF).","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7837","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7837","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7837","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0500","slug":"erc-7857","title":"AI Agents NFT with Private Metadata","authors":"Ming Wu , Jason Zeng , Wei Wu , Michael Heinrich","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Ming Wu , Jason Zeng , Wei Wu , Michael Heinrich","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-7857","source_label":"ERC 7857","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"ERC 7857, AI Agents NFT with Private Metadata. A standard interface for NFTs specifically designed for AI agents, where the metadata represents agent capabilities and requires privacy protection.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7857","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7857","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7857","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0501","slug":"erc-7858","title":"Expirable NFTs and SBTs","authors":"sirawt , ADISAKBOONMARK , parametprame , Nacharoen","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"sirawt , ADISAKBOONMARK , parametprame , Nacharoen","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-7858","source_label":"ERC 7858","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"ERC 7858, Expirable NFTs and SBTs. Introduces an extension for ERC-721 Non-Fungible Tokens (NFTs) and Soulbound Tokens (SBTs) that adds an expiration mechanism, allowing tokens to become invalid after a predefined period.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7858","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7858","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7858","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0502","slug":"erc-7878","title":"Bequeathable Contracts","authors":"Wamith Mockbill","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Wamith Mockbill","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-7878","source_label":"ERC 7878","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"ERC 7878, Bequeathable Contracts. A standard interface for contracts to allow tokens to be inherited after the owner's death.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7878","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7878","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7878","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0503","slug":"erc-7893","title":"DeFi Protocol Solvency Proof Mechanism","authors":"Sean Luis Guada Rodríguez","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Sean Luis Guada Rodríguez","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-7893","source_label":"ERC 7893","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"ERC 7893, DeFi Protocol Solvency Proof Mechanism. A standardized interface that enables DeFi protocols to implement verifiable solvency proofs through smart contracts.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7893","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7893","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7893","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0504","slug":"erc-7908","title":"HD wallet In Treasury Management","authors":"Xiaoyu Liu , Yuxiang Fu , Yanyi Liang , Hao Zou , Siyuan Zheng , yuanshanhshan","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Xiaoyu Liu , Yuxiang Fu , Yanyi Liang , Hao Zou , Siyuan Zheng , yuanshanhshan","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-7908","source_label":"ERC 7908","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"ERC 7908, HD wallet In Treasury Management. This proposal aims to provide a standardized method for on-chain treasury management of institutional assets, ensuring secure private key generation, hierarchical management, and departmental permission isolation while supporting asset security and transaction efficiency in multi-chain environments.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7908","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7908","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7908","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0505","slug":"erc-7913","title":"Signature Verifiers","authors":"Hadrien Croubois , Ernesto García , Francisco Giordano , Aryeh Greenberg","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Hadrien Croubois , Ernesto García , Francisco Giordano , Aryeh Greenberg","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-7913","source_label":"ERC 7913","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"ERC 7913, Signature Verifiers. Externally Owned Accounts (EOA) can sign messages with their associated private keys.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7913","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7913","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7913","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0506","slug":"erc-7943","title":"uRWA - Universal Real World Asset Interface","authors":"Dario Lo Buglio , Tino Martinez Molina , Mihai Colceriu","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Dario Lo Buglio , Tino Martinez Molina , Mihai Colceriu","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Interoperability","topics":["Interoperability"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-7943","source_label":"ERC 7943","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"ERC 7943, uRWA - Universal Real World Asset Interface. The Universal RWA (uRWA) standard, a set of interfaces for tokenized Real World Assets (RWAs) such as securities, real estate, commodities, or other physical/financial assets on the blockchain.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7943","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7943","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7943","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0507","slug":"erc-7950","title":"Encode chain id with transaction hash","authors":"Lauri Peltonen","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Lauri Peltonen","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-7950","source_label":"ERC 7950","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"ERC 7950, Encode chain id with transaction hash. This standard proposes a way to encode the combination of a chain ID and a transaction hash into one string.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7950","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7950","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7950","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0508","slug":"erc-7994","title":"Purpose-Bound ERC-20 with Conditional Unlock","authors":"Anushka Yadav , Akash Kothawade , Atishek Singh","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Anushka Yadav , Akash Kothawade , Atishek Singh","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-7994","source_label":"ERC 7994","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"ERC 7994, Purpose-Bound ERC-20 with Conditional Unlock. This ERC extends the concept introduced in [ERC-7291] by enabling [ERC-20]-compatible tokens to carry multi-condition unlocking constraints, combining temporal, identity, and usage restrictions into a programmable structure.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7994","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-7994","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-7994","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0509","slug":"erc-8001","title":"Agent Coordination Framework","authors":"Kwame Bryan","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Kwame Bryan","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-8001","source_label":"ERC 8001","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"ERC 8001, Agent Coordination Framework. ERC-8001 defines a minimal, single-chain primitive for multi-party agent coordination.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-8001","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-8001","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-8001","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0510","slug":"erc-8034","title":"Referable NFT Royalties","authors":"Ruiqiang Li , Qin Wang , Shiping Chen , Saber Yu , Brian Yecies , John Le","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Ruiqiang Li , Qin Wang , Shiping Chen , Saber Yu , Brian Yecies , John Le","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-8034","source_label":"ERC 8034","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"ERC 8034, Referable NFT Royalties. Royalty Distribution, a standalone royalty distribution for Referable Non-Fungible Tokens (rNFTs).","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-8034","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-8034","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-8034","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0511","slug":"erc-8042","title":"Diamond Storage","authors":"Nick Mudge","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Nick Mudge","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-8042","source_label":"ERC 8042","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"ERC 8042, Diamond Storage. This standard formalizes the diamond storage pattern originally introduced by ERC-2535 Diamonds and widely adopted across smart contracts.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-8042","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-8042","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-8042","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0512","slug":"erc-8063","title":"Groups - Membership Tokens","authors":"Cheng Qian","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Cheng Qian","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-8063","source_label":"ERC 8063","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"ERC 8063, Groups - Membership Tokens. This proposal defines a \"Group\" as an ERC-20 token where token balance represents membership level.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-8063","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-8063","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-8063","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0513","slug":"erc-8126","title":"AI Agent Verification","authors":"Leigh Cronian , Chris Johnson","year":2026,"date_label":"2026","publisher":"Leigh Cronian , Chris Johnson","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Markets","topics":["Markets"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-8126","source_label":"ERC 8126","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2026 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"ERC 8126, AI Agent Verification. A standard interface for verifying AI agents on Ethereum that have been registered via ERC-8004.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-8126","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-8126","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-8126","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0514","slug":"erc-8161","title":"Transferable Tokenized Vault Requests","authors":"Cain O'Sullivan , Jeroen Offerijns","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Cain O'Sullivan , Jeroen Offerijns","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Credit and stable value","topics":["Credit and stable value"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-8161","source_label":"ERC 8161","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"ERC 8161, Transferable Tokenized Vault Requests. This standard extends ERC-7540 by adding optional transferability of pending deposit and redeem Requests.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-8161","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-8161","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-8161","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0515","slug":"erc-8196","title":"AI Agent Authenticated Wallet","authors":"Leigh Cronian , Chris Johnson","year":2026,"date_label":"2026","publisher":"Leigh Cronian , Chris Johnson","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-8196","source_label":"ERC 8196","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2026 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"ERC 8196, AI Agent Authenticated Wallet. A standard interface for AI agent-authenticated wallets.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-8196","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/erc-8196","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/erc-8196","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0516","slug":"bip-46","title":"Address Scheme for Timelocked Fidelity Bonds","authors":"Chris Belcher","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Chris Belcher","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/46","source_label":"BIP 46","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"BIP 46, Address Scheme for Timelocked Fidelity Bonds. The derivation scheme for HD wallets which create timelocked addresses used for creating fidelity bonds.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-46","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-46","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-46","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0517","slug":"bip-53","title":"Disallow 64-byte transactions","authors":"Chris Stewart","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Chris Stewart","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/53","source_label":"BIP 53","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"BIP 53, Disallow 64-byte transactions. The rationale for disallowing transactions that are serialized to 64 bytes without the transaction's witness.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-53","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-53","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-53","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0518","slug":"bip-93","title":"codex32: Checksummed SSSS-aware BIP32 seeds","authors":"Leon Olsson Curr and Pearlwort Sneed","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Leon Olsson Curr and Pearlwort Sneed","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/93","source_label":"BIP 93","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"BIP 93, codex32: Checksummed SSSS-aware BIP32 seeds. We first describe the general checksummed base32 '''Why use base32 at all?''' The lack of mixed case makes it more efficient to read out loud, write, type or to put into QR codes.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-93","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-93","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-93","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0519","slug":"bip-98","title":"Fast Merkle Trees","authors":"Mark Friedenbach","year":2017,"date_label":"2017","publisher":"Mark Friedenbach","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/98","source_label":"BIP 98","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2017 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"BIP 98, Fast Merkle Trees. In many applications it is useful to prove membership of a data element in a set without having to reveal the entire contents of that set.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-98","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-98","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-98","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0520","slug":"bip-116","title":"MERKLEBRANCHVERIFY","authors":"Mark Friedenbach","year":2017,"date_label":"2017","publisher":"Mark Friedenbach","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/116","source_label":"BIP 116","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2017 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"BIP 116, MERKLEBRANCHVERIFY. A general approach to bitcoin contracts is to fully enumerate the possible spending conditions and then program verification of these conditions into a single script.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-116","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-116","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-116","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0521","slug":"bip-117","title":"Tail Call Execution Semantics","authors":"Mark Friedenbach","year":2017,"date_label":"2017","publisher":"Mark Friedenbach","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/117","source_label":"BIP 117","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2017 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"BIP 117, Tail Call Execution Semantics. BIP16 (Pay to Script Hash)[1] and BIP141 (Segregated Witness)[2] provide mechanisms by which script policy can be revealed at spend time as part of the execution witness.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-117","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-117","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-117","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0522","slug":"bip-118","title":"SIGHASH_ANYPREVOUT for Taproot Scripts","authors":"Christian Decker","year":2017,"date_label":"2017","publisher":"Christian Decker","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/118","source_label":"BIP 118","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2017 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"BIP 118, SIGHASH_ANYPREVOUT for Taproot Scripts. This BIP modifies the behaviour of the [[bip-0342.mediawiki|BIP 342]] signature opcodes '''What about key path spends?''' This proposal only supports ANYPREVOUT signatures via script path spends, and does not support ANYPREVOUT signatures for key path spends.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-118","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-118","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-118","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0523","slug":"bip-119","title":"CHECKTEMPLATEVERIFY","authors":"Jeremy Rubin","year":2020,"date_label":"2020","publisher":"Jeremy Rubin","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/119","source_label":"BIP 119","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2020 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"BIP 119, CHECKTEMPLATEVERIFY. A new opcode, OP_CHECKTEMPLATEVERIFY, to be activated as a change to the semantics of OP_NOP4.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-119","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-119","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-119","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0524","slug":"bip-122","title":"URI scheme for Blockchain references / exploration","authors":"Marco Pontello","year":2015,"date_label":"2015","publisher":"Marco Pontello","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/122","source_label":"BIP 122","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2015 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"BIP 122, URI scheme for Blockchain references / exploration. A URI scheme for looking up blocks, transactions and addresses on a Blockchain explorer, or in general to make proper Blockchain references.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-122","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-122","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-122","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0525","slug":"bip-126","title":"Best Practices for Heterogeneous Input Script Transactions","authors":"Kristov Atlas","year":2016,"date_label":"2016","publisher":"Kristov Atlas","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/126","source_label":"BIP 126","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2016 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"BIP 126, Best Practices for Heterogeneous Input Script Transactions. When a Bitcoin transaction contains inputs that reference previous transaction outputs sent to different Bitcoin addresses, personally identifiable information of the user will leak into the blockchain in an uncontrolled manner.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-126","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-126","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-126","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0526","slug":"bip-128","title":"Timelock-Recovery Storage Format","authors":"Oren Z","year":2026,"date_label":"2026","publisher":"Oren Z","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/128","source_label":"BIP 128","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2026 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"BIP 128, Timelock-Recovery Storage Format. This document proposes a standard format for saving timelock-recovery plans, to allow different wallets to generate them, and different services to monitor/execute them.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-128","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-128","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-128","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0527","slug":"bip-136","title":"Bech32 Encoded Tx Position References","authors":"Велеслав","year":2017,"date_label":"2017","publisher":"Велеслав","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/136","source_label":"BIP 136","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2017 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"BIP 136, Bech32 Encoded Tx Position References. A '''confirmed transaction position reference''', or '''TxRef''', is a reference to a particular location within the blockchain, specified by the block height and a transaction index within the block, and optionally, an outpoint index within the transaction.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-136","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-136","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-136","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0528","slug":"bip-172","title":"Define Bitcoin Subunits as Satoshis","authors":"OceanSlim","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"OceanSlim","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/172","source_label":"BIP 172","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"BIP 172, Define Bitcoin Subunits as Satoshis. To formally define and standardize Bitcoin's smallest indivisible unit (1/100,000,000 of a bitcoin) as \"satoshi\" (singular) or \"satoshis\" (plural), with \"sats\" as the standard abbreviated form.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-172","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-172","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-172","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0529","slug":"bip-178","title":"Version Extended WIF","authors":"Karl-Johan Alm","year":2018,"date_label":"2018","publisher":"Karl-Johan Alm","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Storage and networks","topics":["Storage and networks"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/178","source_label":"BIP 178","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2018 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"BIP 178, Version Extended WIF. An extension to the Wallet Import Format (WIF) to specify what kind of bitcoin address the private key corresponds to.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-178","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-178","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-178","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0530","slug":"bip-197","title":"Hashed Time-Locked Collateral Contract","authors":"Matthew Black","year":2019,"date_label":"2019","publisher":"Matthew Black","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Interoperability","topics":["Interoperability"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/197","source_label":"BIP 197","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2019 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"BIP 197, Hashed Time-Locked Collateral Contract. A script for generalized debt agreement contract based on Hashed Time-Lock Contract (BIP 199) transactions according to the Atomic Loans specification (https://arxiv.org/pdf/1901.05117.pdf).","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-197","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-197","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-197","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0531","slug":"bip-300","title":"Hashrate Escrows (Consensus layer)","authors":"Paul Sztorc","year":2017,"date_label":"2017","publisher":"Paul Sztorc","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Interoperability","topics":["Interoperability"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/300","source_label":"BIP 300","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2017 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"BIP 300, Hashrate Escrows (Consensus layer). BIP-300 enables a new type of L2, where \"withdrawals\" (the L2-to-L1 txns) are governed by proof-of-work -- instead of a federation or fixed set of pubkeys.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-300","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-300","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-300","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0532","slug":"bip-301","title":"Blind Merged Mining (Consensus layer)","authors":"Paul Sztorc","year":2019,"date_label":"2019","publisher":"Paul Sztorc","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/301","source_label":"BIP 301","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2019 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"BIP 301, Blind Merged Mining (Consensus layer). Blind Merged Mining (BMM) allows SHA-256d miners to collect transaction fee revenue from other blockchains, without running any new software (i.e., without \"looking\" at those alt-chains, hence \"blind\").","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-301","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-301","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-301","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0533","slug":"bip-310","title":"Stratum protocol extensions","authors":"Pavel Moravec","year":2018,"date_label":"2018","publisher":"Pavel Moravec","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/310","source_label":"BIP 310","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2018 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"BIP 310, Stratum protocol extensions. This BIP provides a generic mechanism for specifying stratum protocol extensions.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-310","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-310","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-310","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0534","slug":"bip-320","title":"nVersion bits for general purpose use","authors":"BtcDrak","year":2018,"date_label":"2018","publisher":"BtcDrak","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/320","source_label":"BIP 320","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2018 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"BIP 320, nVersion bits for general purpose use. This BIP reserves 16 bits of the block header nVersion field for general purpose use and removes their meaning for the purpose of version bits soft-fork signalling.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-320","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-320","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-320","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0535","slug":"bip-323","title":"24 nVersion bits for general purpose use","authors":"Matt Corallo","year":2026,"date_label":"2026","publisher":"Matt Corallo","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/323","source_label":"BIP 323","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2026 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"BIP 323, 24 nVersion bits for general purpose use. 24 bits are reserved in the nVersion field as extra nonce space for miners, providing for additional hashrate with header-only mining without relying on rolling nTime more often than once per second.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-323","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-323","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-323","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0536","slug":"bip-326","title":"Anti-fee-sniping in taproot transactions","authors":"Chris Belcher","year":2021,"date_label":"2021","publisher":"Chris Belcher","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Interoperability","topics":["Interoperability"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/326","source_label":"BIP 326","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2021 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"BIP 326, Anti-fee-sniping in taproot transactions. This document proposes a certain type of wallet behaviour which uses BIP341 taproot[1].","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-326","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-326","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-326","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0537","slug":"bip-329","title":"Wallet Labels Export Format","authors":"Craig Raw","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Craig Raw","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/329","source_label":"BIP 329","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"BIP 329, Wallet Labels Export Format. This document specifies a format for the export of labels that may be attached to various common types of records in a wallet.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-329","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-329","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-329","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0538","slug":"bip-330","title":"Transaction announcements reconciliation","authors":"Gleb Naumenko","year":2019,"date_label":"2019","publisher":"Gleb Naumenko","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Storage and networks","topics":["Storage and networks"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/330","source_label":"BIP 330","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2019 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"BIP 330, Transaction announcements reconciliation. This document specifies a P2P protocol extension for reconciliation of transaction announcements between 2 nodes , which is a building block for efficient transaction relay protocols (e.g., [https://arxiv.org/pdf/1905.10518.pdf Erlay]).","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-330","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-330","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-330","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0539","slug":"bip-331","title":"Ancestor Package Relay","authors":"Gloria Zhao","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Gloria Zhao","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Storage and networks","topics":["Storage and networks"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/331","source_label":"BIP 331","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"BIP 331, Ancestor Package Relay. Peer-to-peer protocol messages enabling nodes to request and relay the unconfirmed ancestor package of a given transaction, and to request and relay transactions in batches.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-331","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-331","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-331","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0540","slug":"bip-360","title":"Pay-to-Merkle-Root (P2MR)","authors":"Hunter Beast","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Hunter Beast","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/360","source_label":"BIP 360","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"BIP 360, Pay-to-Merkle-Root (P2MR). We define the Pay-to-Merkle-Root (P2MR) output structure as follows: A P2MR output is similar to a P2TR output (as defined in [[bip-0341.mediawiki|BIP 341]]); however, unlike P2TR outputs, we disable the key path spend for the benefit of quantum resistance by omitting the internal key and the tap tweak step.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-360","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-360","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-360","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0541","slug":"bip-361","title":"Post Quantum Migration and Legacy Signature Sunset","authors":"Jameson Lopp","year":2026,"date_label":"2026","publisher":"Jameson Lopp","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/361","source_label":"BIP 361","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2026 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"BIP 361, Post Quantum Migration and Legacy Signature Sunset. {| class=\"wikitable\" |- style=\"text-align:center;\" ! Phase ! What Happens ! Who Must Act ! Time Horizon |- | A | Permitted sends are from legacy scripts to PQ scripts.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-361","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-361","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-361","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0542","slug":"bip-372","title":"Pay-to-contract tweak fields for PSBT","authors":"Maxim Orlovsky","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Maxim Orlovsky","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/372","source_label":"BIP 372","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"BIP 372, Pay-to-contract tweak fields for PSBT. The new per-input type is defined as follows: {| ! Name ! ! ! Description ! ! Description ! Versions Requiring Inclusion ! Versions Requiring Exclusion ! Versions Allowing Inclusion |- | P2C Key Tweak | PSBT_IN_P2C_TWEAK = 0x19 | | 33 bytes of compact public key serialization specifying to which keys the P2C tweak may be applied (i.e.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-372","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-372","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-372","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0543","slug":"bip-374","title":"Discrete Log Equality Proofs","authors":"Andrew Toth","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Andrew Toth","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/374","source_label":"BIP 374","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"BIP 374, Discrete Log Equality Proofs. All conventions and notations are used as defined in [https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0327.mediawiki#notation BIP327].","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-374","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-374","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-374","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0544","slug":"bip-375","title":"Sending Silent Payments with PSBTs","authors":"Andrew Toth","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Andrew Toth","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/375","source_label":"BIP 375","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"BIP 375, Sending Silent Payments with PSBTs. This document specifies new fields and new field inclusion/exclusion requirements.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-375","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-375","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-375","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0545","slug":"bip-376","title":"Spending Silent Payment outputs with PSBTs","authors":"nymius","year":2026,"date_label":"2026","publisher":"nymius","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/376","source_label":"BIP 376","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2026 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"BIP 376, Spending Silent Payment outputs with PSBTs. We use the following functions and conventions: ser 32 (i): serializes a 32-bit unsigned integer ''i'' as a 4-byte sequence, most significant byte first.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-376","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-376","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-376","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0546","slug":"bip-389","title":"Multipath Descriptor Key Expressions","authors":"Ava Chow","year":2022,"date_label":"2022","publisher":"Ava Chow","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/389","source_label":"BIP 389","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2022 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"BIP 389, Multipath Descriptor Key Expressions. This document specifies a modification to Key Expressions of Descriptors that are described in BIP 380.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-389","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-389","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-389","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0547","slug":"bip-390","title":"musig() Descriptor Key Expression","authors":"Ava Chow","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Ava Chow","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/390","source_label":"BIP 390","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"BIP 390, musig() Descriptor Key Expression. This document specifies a musig() key expression for output script descriptors.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-390","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-390","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-390","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0548","slug":"bip-392","title":"Silent Payment Output Script Descriptors","authors":"Craig Raw","year":2026,"date_label":"2026","publisher":"Craig Raw","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/392","source_label":"BIP 392","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2026 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"BIP 392, Silent Payment Output Script Descriptors. This document specifies sp() output script descriptors for silent payments.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-392","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-392","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-392","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0549","slug":"bip-393","title":"Output Script Descriptor Annotations","authors":"Craig Raw","year":2026,"date_label":"2026","publisher":"Craig Raw","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/393","source_label":"BIP 393","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2026 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"BIP 393, Output Script Descriptor Annotations. This document specifies an optional annotation syntax for output script descriptors as defined in [[bip-0380.mediawiki|BIP 380]].","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-393","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-393","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-393","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0550","slug":"bip-431","title":"Topology Restrictions for Pinning","authors":"Gloria Zhao","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Gloria Zhao","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/431","source_label":"BIP 431","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"BIP 431, Topology Restrictions for Pinning. This document describes pinning problems that can arise from limitations in mempool policy.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-431","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-431","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-431","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0551","slug":"bip-433","title":"Pay to Anchor (P2A)","authors":"Gregory Sanders","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Gregory Sanders","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/433","source_label":"BIP 433","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"BIP 433, Pay to Anchor (P2A). This document describes a new standard output script called Pay to Anchor (P2A) and prescribes making spending of this output type standard.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-433","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-433","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-433","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0552","slug":"bip-443","title":"OP_CHECKCONTRACTVERIFY","authors":"Salvatore Ingala","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Salvatore Ingala","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/443","source_label":"BIP 443","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"BIP 443, OP_CHECKCONTRACTVERIFY. To add consensus support for a new tapscript opcode that enables a new type of output restrictions: OP_CHECKCONTRACTVERIFY ( OP_CCV ).","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-443","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-443","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-443","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0553","slug":"bip-450","title":"Formosa—Seed encoding by themed mnemonic stories","authors":"Yuri S Villas Boas","year":2026,"date_label":"2026","publisher":"Yuri S Villas Boas","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://bips.dev/450","source_label":"BIP 450","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2026 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"BIP 450, Formosa—Seed encoding by themed mnemonic stories. Formosa, an expansion of BIP-0039 for the generation of deterministic wallets.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-450","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/bip-450","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/bip-450","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0554","slug":"eip-2780","title":"Resource-based intrinsic transaction gas","authors":"Matt Garnett , Uri Klarman , Ben Adams , Maria Inês Silva , Anders Elowsson , Anthony Sassano , Dragan Rakita","year":2020,"date_label":"2020","publisher":"Matt Garnett , Uri Klarman , Ben Adams , Maria Inês Silva , Anders Elowsson , Anthony Sassano , Dragan Rakita","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-2780","source_label":"EIP 2780","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2020 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"EIP 2780, Resource-based intrinsic transaction gas. This EIP decomposes the flat 21,000 intrinsic transaction cost into explicit primitives, each priced to match the resources a transaction actually consumes.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-2780","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-2780","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-2780","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0555","slug":"eip-3076","title":"Slashing Protection Interchange Format","authors":"Michael Sproul , Sacha Saint-Leger , Danny Ryan","year":2020,"date_label":"2020","publisher":"Michael Sproul , Sacha Saint-Leger , Danny Ryan","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-3076","source_label":"EIP 3076","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2020 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"EIP 3076, Slashing Protection Interchange Format. A standard format for transferring a key's signing history allows validators to easily switch between clients without the risk of signing conflicting messages.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-3076","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-3076","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-3076","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0556","slug":"eip-3155","title":"EVM trace specification","authors":"Martin Holst Swende , Marius van der Wijden","year":2020,"date_label":"2020","publisher":"Martin Holst Swende , Marius van der Wijden","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-3155","source_label":"EIP 3155","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2020 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"EIP 3155, EVM trace specification. Introduce a new JSON standard for EVM traces during execution of state tests.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-3155","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-3155","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-3155","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0557","slug":"eip-7495","title":"SSZ ProgressiveContainer","authors":"Etan Kissling , Cayman","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Etan Kissling , Cayman","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-7495","source_label":"EIP 7495","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"EIP 7495, SSZ ProgressiveContainer. A new Simple Serialize (SSZ) type to represent containers with forward-compatible Merkleization: A given field is always assigned the same stable generalized index (gindex) even when different container versions append new fields or drop existing fields.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7495","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7495","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7495","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0558","slug":"eip-7523","title":"Empty accounts deprecation","authors":"Peter Davies","year":2023,"date_label":"2023","publisher":"Peter Davies","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-7523","source_label":"EIP 7523","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2023 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"EIP 7523, Empty accounts deprecation. This EIP prohibits the state of any post-merge network from containing empty accounts.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7523","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7523","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7523","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0559","slug":"eip-7610","title":"Revert creation in case of non-empty storage","authors":"Gary Rong , Martin Holst Swende","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Gary Rong , Martin Holst Swende","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-7610","source_label":"EIP 7610","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"EIP 7610, Revert creation in case of non-empty storage. This EIP causes contract creation to throw an error when attempted at an address with pre-existing storage.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7610","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7610","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7610","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0560","slug":"eip-7688","title":"Forward compatible consensus data structures","authors":"Etan Kissling , Cayman","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Etan Kissling , Cayman","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-7688","source_label":"EIP 7688","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"EIP 7688, Forward compatible consensus data structures. The changes needed to adopt ProgressiveContainer from EIP-7495 and ProgressiveList from EIP-7916 in consensus data structures.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7688","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7688","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7688","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0561","slug":"eip-7708","title":"ETH transfers emit a log","authors":"Vitalik Buterin , Peter Davies , Etan Kissling , Gajinder Singh , Carson , Jared Wasinger","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Vitalik Buterin , Peter Davies , Etan Kissling , Gajinder Singh , Carson , Jared Wasinger","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-7708","source_label":"EIP 7708","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"EIP 7708, ETH transfers emit a log. Logs are often used to track when balance changes of assets on Ethereum.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7708","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7708","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7708","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0562","slug":"eip-7732","title":"Enshrined Proposer-Builder Separation","authors":"Francesco D'Amato , Nico Flaig , Barnabé Monnot , Michael Neuder , Potuz , Justin Traglia , Terence Tsao","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Francesco D'Amato , Nico Flaig , Barnabé Monnot , Michael Neuder , Potuz , Justin Traglia , Terence Tsao","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-7732","source_label":"EIP 7732","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"EIP 7732, Enshrined Proposer-Builder Separation. This EIP fundamentally changes the way an Ethereum block is validated by decoupling the execution validation from the consensus validation both logically as well as temporally.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7732","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7732","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7732","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0563","slug":"eip-7778","title":"Block Gas Accounting without Refunds","authors":"Ben Adams , Toni Wahrstätter","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Ben Adams , Toni Wahrstätter","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-7778","source_label":"EIP 7778","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"EIP 7778, Block Gas Accounting without Refunds. This EIP modifies the block gas accounting mechanism to prevent the circumvention of block gas limits.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7778","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7778","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7778","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0564","slug":"eip-7784","title":"GETCONTRACT opcode","authors":"Tim Pechersky","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Tim Pechersky","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-7784","source_label":"EIP 7784","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"EIP 7784, GETCONTRACT opcode. This is a proposal to add a new opcode, GETCONTRACT.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7784","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7784","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7784","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0565","slug":"eip-7834","title":"Separate Metadata Section for EOF","authors":"Kaan Uzdogan , Marco Castignoli , Manuel Wedler","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Kaan Uzdogan , Marco Castignoli , Manuel Wedler","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-7834","source_label":"EIP 7834","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"EIP 7834, Separate Metadata Section for EOF. Introduce a new separate metadata section to the Ethereum Object Format (EOF) that is unreachable by the code, and any changes to which does not affect the code.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7834","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7834","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7834","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0566","slug":"eip-7843","title":"SLOTNUM opcode","authors":"Marc Harvey-Hill","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Marc Harvey-Hill","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-7843","source_label":"EIP 7843","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"EIP 7843, SLOTNUM opcode. To add a new opcode SLOTNUM (0x4b), that returns the corresponding slot number for the current block.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7843","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7843","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7843","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0567","slug":"eip-7880","title":"EOF - EXTCODEADDRESS instruction","authors":"Danno Ferrin","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Danno Ferrin","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-7880","source_label":"EIP 7880","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"EIP 7880, EOF - EXTCODEADDRESS instruction. Add an instruction to EOF that reads code delegation designations from an account without requiring code introspection.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7880","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7880","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7880","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0568","slug":"eip-7904","title":"Compute Gas Cost Analysis","authors":"Jacek Glen , Lukasz Glen , Maria Silva","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Jacek Glen , Lukasz Glen , Maria Silva","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-7904","source_label":"EIP 7904","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"EIP 7904, Compute Gas Cost Analysis. This document reports an empirical analysis of the runtime of EVM compute operations and precompiles across the major execution clients.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7904","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7904","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7904","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0569","slug":"eip-7916","title":"SSZ ProgressiveList","authors":"Zsolt Felföldi , Cayman , Etan Kissling","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Zsolt Felföldi , Cayman , Etan Kissling","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-7916","source_label":"EIP 7916","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"EIP 7916, SSZ ProgressiveList. A new Merkle tree shape for Simple Serialize (SSZ) types that results in fewer hashes when only a small number of leaves is used.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7916","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7916","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7916","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0570","slug":"eip-7928","title":"Block-Level Access Lists","authors":"Toni Wahrstätter , Dankrad Feist , Francesco D`Amato , Jochem Brouwer , Ignacio Hagopian , Felipe Selmo , Rahul , Stefan","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Toni Wahrstätter , Dankrad Feist , Francesco D`Amato , Jochem Brouwer , Ignacio Hagopian , Felipe Selmo , Rahul , Stefan","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-7928","source_label":"EIP 7928","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"EIP 7928, Block-Level Access Lists. Block-Level Access Lists (BALs) that record all accounts and storage locations accessed during block execution, along with their post-execution values.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7928","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7928","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7928","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0571","slug":"eip-7954","title":"Increase Maximum Contract Size","authors":"Giulio Rebuffo , Ben Adams","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Giulio Rebuffo , Ben Adams","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Data and agents","topics":["Data and agents"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-7954","source_label":"EIP 7954","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"EIP 7954, Increase Maximum Contract Size. To raise the maximum allowed size for contract code deployed on Ethereum from 24,576 bytes to 65,536 bytes, and to raise the initcode size limit from 49,152 bytes to 131,072 bytes.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7954","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7954","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7954","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0572","slug":"eip-7975","title":"eth/70 - partial block receipt lists","authors":"Felix Lange , Jochem Brouwer , Giulio Rebuffo","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Felix Lange , Jochem Brouwer , Giulio Rebuffo","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Storage and networks","topics":["Storage and networks"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-7975","source_label":"EIP 7975","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"EIP 7975, eth/70 - partial block receipt lists. This EIP modifies the 'eth' p2p protocol to allow requesting partial block receipt lists.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7975","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7975","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7975","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0573","slug":"eip-7976","title":"Increase Calldata Floor Cost","authors":"Toni Wahrstätter","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Toni Wahrstätter","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-7976","source_label":"EIP 7976","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"EIP 7976, Increase Calldata Floor Cost. An adjustment to calldata pricing by raising the floor cost from 10/40 to 64/64 gas per calldata byte.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7976","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7976","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7976","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0574","slug":"eip-7981","title":"Increase Access List Cost","authors":"Toni Wahrstätter","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Toni Wahrstätter","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-7981","source_label":"EIP 7981","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"EIP 7981, Increase Access List Cost. This EIP charges access lists for their data footprint, preventing the circumvention of the EIP-7623 floor pricing.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7981","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7981","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7981","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0575","slug":"eip-7997","title":"Deterministic Factory Contract","authors":"Francisco Giordano , Toni Wahrstätter , Nick Johnson , Jochem Brouwer","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Francisco Giordano , Toni Wahrstätter , Nick Johnson , Jochem Brouwer","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-7997","source_label":"EIP 7997","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"EIP 7997, Deterministic Factory Contract. The availability of a well-known CREATE2 factory at 0x4e59b44847b379578588920cA78FbF26c0B4956C is made a formal requirement to enable deterministic deployments at identical addresses across EVM chains.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7997","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-7997","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-7997","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0576","slug":"eip-8024","title":"Backward compatible SWAPN, DUPN, EXCHANGE","authors":"Francisco Giordano , Charles Cooper , Alex Beregszaszi , Paweł Bylica","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Francisco Giordano , Charles Cooper , Alex Beregszaszi , Paweł Bylica","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-8024","source_label":"EIP 8024","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"EIP 8024, Backward compatible SWAPN, DUPN, EXCHANGE. Currently, SWAP and DUP instructions are limited to a stack depth of 16.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8024","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-8024","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8024","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0577","slug":"eip-8037","title":"State Creation Gas Cost Increase","authors":"Maria Silva , Carlos Perez , Jochem Brouwer , Ansgar Dietrichs , Łukasz Rozmej , Anders Elowsson , Francesco D'Amato , Dragan Rakita , Paweł Bylica , Spencer Taylor-Brown","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Maria Silva , Carlos Perez , Jochem Brouwer , Ansgar Dietrichs , Łukasz Rozmej , Anders Elowsson , Francesco D'Amato , Dragan Rakita , Paweł Bylica , Spencer Taylor-Brown","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-8037","source_label":"EIP 8037","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"EIP 8037, State Creation Gas Cost Increase. This proposal increases the cost of state creation operations, thus avoiding excessive state growth under increased block gas limits.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8037","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-8037","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8037","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0578","slug":"eip-8038","title":"State-access gas cost update","authors":"Maria Silva , Wei Han Ng , Ansgar Dietrichs","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Maria Silva , Wei Han Ng , Ansgar Dietrichs","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-8038","source_label":"EIP 8038","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"EIP 8038, State-access gas cost update. This EIP updates the gas cost of state-access operations to reflect Ethereum's larger state and the consequent slowdown of these operations.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8038","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-8038","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8038","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0579","slug":"eip-8045","title":"Exclude slashed validators from proposing","authors":"Francesco D'Amato , Barnabas Busa","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Francesco D'Amato , Barnabas Busa","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-8045","source_label":"EIP 8045","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"EIP 8045, Exclude slashed validators from proposing. A modification to the beacon chain proposer selection process to exclude slashed validators from being selected as proposers.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8045","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-8045","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8045","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0580","slug":"eip-8061","title":"Increase exit and consolidation churn","authors":"Francesco D'Amato , Anders Elowsson","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Francesco D'Amato , Anders Elowsson","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-8061","source_label":"EIP 8061","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"EIP 8061, Increase exit and consolidation churn. This EIP roughly doubles the consolidation churn, as well as quadrupling the exit churn and restoring its proportionality to total stake (though maintaining the existing cap on activations).","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8061","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-8061","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8061","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0581","slug":"eip-8066","title":"Upgrade Mascots","authors":"Jordan Holberg , Andrew B Coathup","year":2024,"date_label":"2024","publisher":"Jordan Holberg , Andrew B Coathup","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Privacy","topics":["Privacy"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-8066","source_label":"EIP 8066","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2024 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"EIP 8066, Upgrade Mascots. This EIP establishes a mascot for each Ethereum network upgrade.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8066","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-8066","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8066","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0582","slug":"eip-8070","title":"eth/72 - Sparse Blobpool","authors":"Raúl Kripalani , Bosul Mun , Francesco D'Amato , Csaba Kiraly , Felix Lange , Marios Ioannou , Alex Stokes , Kamil Salakhiev","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Raúl Kripalani , Bosul Mun , Francesco D'Amato , Csaba Kiraly , Felix Lange , Marios Ioannou , Alex Stokes , Kamil Salakhiev","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-8070","source_label":"EIP 8070","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"EIP 8070, eth/72 - Sparse Blobpool. This proposal introduces the sparse blobpool, a construction that brings cell-level, custody-aligned sampling in the Execution Layer (EL).","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8070","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-8070","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8070","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0583","slug":"eip-8133","title":"Network Upgrade Naming","authors":"Pooja Ranjan","year":2026,"date_label":"2026","publisher":"Pooja Ranjan","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-8133","source_label":"EIP 8133","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2026 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"EIP 8133, Network Upgrade Naming. This EIP documents the naming conventions used for Ethereum network upgrades across the Execution Layer, Consensus Layer, post-Merge combined upgrades, and Blob-Parameter-Only upgrades.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8133","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-8133","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8133","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0584","slug":"eip-8136","title":"Cell-Level Deltas for Data Column Broadcast","authors":"Marco Munizaga , Daniel Knopik , Sukun Tarachandani , Aarsh Shah","year":2025,"date_label":"2025","publisher":"Marco Munizaga , Daniel Knopik , Sukun Tarachandani , Aarsh Shah","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-8136","source_label":"EIP 8136","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2025 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"EIP 8136, Cell-Level Deltas for Data Column Broadcast. Cell-Level Deltas for Data Column Broadcast optimizes PeerDAS (EIP-7594) by allowing more efficient transfers of blob data columns across the network.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8136","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-8136","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8136","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0585","slug":"eip-8159","title":"eth/71 - Block Access List Exchange","authors":"Toni Wahrstätter","year":2026,"date_label":"2026","publisher":"Toni Wahrstätter","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Storage and networks","topics":["Storage and networks"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-8159","source_label":"EIP 8159","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2026 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"EIP 8159, eth/71 - Block Access List Exchange. This EIP modifies the 'eth' p2p protocol to support Block-level Access Lists (BALs).","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8159","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-8159","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8159","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0586","slug":"eip-8163","title":"Reserve `EXTENSION (0xae)` opcode","authors":"Bruce Collie , Piotr Dobaczewski","year":2026,"date_label":"2026","publisher":"Bruce Collie , Piotr Dobaczewski","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-8163","source_label":"EIP 8163","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2026 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"EIP 8163, Reserve `EXTENSION (0xae)` opcode. Reserve an opcode EXTENSION (0xae) which will be guaranteed to not become a valid opcode on Ethereum L1 EVM, but which will be available to be used in other EVMs as a prefix to encode extension instructions.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8163","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-8163","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8163","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0587","slug":"eip-8182","title":"Private ETH and ERC-20 Transfers","authors":"Tom Lehman","year":2026,"date_label":"2026","publisher":"Tom Lehman","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-8182","source_label":"EIP 8182","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2026 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"EIP 8182, Private ETH and ERC-20 Transfers. Private ETH and ERC-20 transfers via a shielded-pool system contract.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8182","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-8182","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8182","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0588","slug":"eip-8189","title":"snap/2 - BAL-Based State Healing","authors":"Toni Wahrstätter , Gary Rong","year":2026,"date_label":"2026","publisher":"Toni Wahrstätter , Gary Rong","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Storage and networks","topics":["Storage and networks"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-8189","source_label":"EIP 8189","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2026 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"EIP 8189, snap/2 - BAL-Based State Healing. This EIP upgrades the snap protocol from version 1 to version 2, removing GetTrieNodes (0x06) / TrieNodes (0x07) and adding GetBlockAccessLists (0x08) / BlockAccessLists (0x09) to enable BAL-based state healing during snap sync.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8189","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-8189","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8189","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0589","slug":"eip-8246","title":"Remove SELFDESTRUCT Burn","authors":"Paweł Bylica","year":2026,"date_label":"2026","publisher":"Paweł Bylica","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Scaling","topics":["Scaling"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-8246","source_label":"EIP 8246","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2026 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"EIP 8246, Remove SELFDESTRUCT Burn. This EIP removes the remaining cases where SELFDESTRUCT burns ETH.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8246","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-8246","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8246","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"},{"document_id":"BLC-STUDY-0590","slug":"eip-8261","title":"Gas Limit Schedule","authors":"Barnabas Busa","year":2026,"date_label":"2026","publisher":"Barnabas Busa","paper_type":"Design paper","category":"Consensus","topics":["Consensus"],"source_url":"https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-8261","source_label":"EIP 8261","legacy_pdf_path":null,"sha256":null,"sha256_note":"No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.","version":"Source cited by the 2026 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.","doi":null,"rights_status":"Official external source only","source_status":"Official source","use_status":"Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.","licence":null,"licence_label":"No licence recorded. Rights status under review.","full_text":null,"full_text_reason":"Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.","editorial_line":"EIP 8261, Gas Limit Schedule. This EIP recommends that, starting with Gloas (EIP-7732), consensus layer clients source their gas limit preference from an optional GAS_LIMIT_SCHEDULE field in the consensus layer config.yaml instead of hardcoded, release-scoped defaults.","canonical_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8261","record_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/eip-8261","study_url":"https://blockchainlab.com/whitepaper/eip-8261","last_reviewed":"2026-10-01","last_checked":"2026-10-01"}]}