Storage
Kubo (IPFS)
An IPFS implementation. The licence is dual, with a carve-out for older contributions.
Amber — conditions, and a legal review before you copy it in
- SPDX or status
- MIT OR Apache-2.0, with a pre-2019 caveat
- Confidence
- medium
- Maintainer
- IPFS / Protocol Labs ecosystem
- Runtime
- Content-addressed storage
- Repository
- ipfs/kubo
GitHub returned NOASSERTION. The LICENSE file read on 2026-10-01 says the project is moving from MIT-only to dual MIT/Apache-2.0, and that code contributed before 2019-05-06 may be MIT-only unless the contributor signed off. Blockchain Lab has not audited this repository. A licence check is not a vulnerability scan, a dependency review, or a security audit.
Read the LICENSE before copying a file. Public IPFS is not access control.
Reuse status
Research available. Review required.
Copyleft, mixed terms, a dated dual licence, or a repository whose maintainer record is not settled. Legal review would be required before any copy. The scan gates are also unmet.
- Source class
- S3 conditional
- Commit
- Not pinned
- Source-derived demo
- Held
Available
- E0: Metadata
- E1: Research report
- E2: Citation bundle
- E3: Pattern blueprint
- E4: Test plan
- E5: Original scaffold
Not available
- E6: Source-derived demo pack — held
- E7: Full source bundle — held
- E8: Dataset export — held
- E9: Model-training pack — held
- E10: Production candidate pack — held
Kubo (IPFS) is conditional. Copyleft, mixed terms, or a maintainer caveat still needs a legal reading, and the scan gates are unmet. Non-commercial or demo use does not remove the licence duty. When in doubt, link — do not copy.
Use
- Content addressing of files you have the right to distribute
Do not use for
- A privacy vault
- Assuming every historical line is Apache-licensed
Risks
- Public content addressing publishes the bytes to anyone who has the identifier.
- Personal data does not belong there.
Reviews required
- Data-protection review before any personal or customer file is addressed
No source code is reproduced on this page. No commit SHA is published, because this release did not pin one.
