LibraryPrivacy2021Design paperCorpus record
PSBT Version 2
BIP 370. Ava Chow.
BIP 370, PSBT Version 2. PSBT Version 2 (PSBTv2) only specifies new fields and field inclusion/exclusion requirements.
Status in the source: Deployed. A reading of the public specification, not a copy of it and not a certification.
PSBT Version 2 is worth reading for the rule it actually adds: PSBT Version 2 (PSBTv2) only specifies new fields and field inclusion/exclusion requirements.
The five-minute read
The rule
PSBT Version 2 (PSBTv2) only specifies new fields and field inclusion/exclusion requirements.
What was already failing
A signature that does not commit to what the user saw can be replayed into a different spend, a different chain, or a different message.
What the number does not mean
The source marks this deployed. That is a statement about the text, not a promise that every wallet or node has shipped it.
What a builder should be able to point at
An implementation either constrains PSBT, PSBT_GLOBAL_UNSIGNED_TX, PSBT_GLOBAL_VERSION or it is a different design.
One action, walked through
- Open BIP 370 and read the status line before the examples.
- Write down the rule in one sentence. A fair version of that sentence is: PSBT Version 2 (PSBTv2) only specifies new fields and field inclusion/exclusion requirements.
- Name the object that changes: PSBT, PSBT_GLOBAL_UNSIGNED_TX, PSBT_GLOBAL_VERSION.
- Ask what an old client, an old contract, or an offline counterparty does. If the document is silent, the silence is part of the design.
The argument, unpacked
What the text is allowed to settle
Bitcoin Improvement Proposal 370 can settle the shape of PSBT Version 2. It cannot settle whether a later client, a later fork, or a later wallet still does this.
What this page will not pretend
There is no benchmark, no adoption number, and no claim that the mechanism is safe outside the assumptions written in the source.
What has to be true
- You are implementing BIP 370 at the status the text itself states: Deployed.
- The object that has to change is PSBT, PSBT_GLOBAL_UNSIGNED_TX, PSBT_GLOBAL_VERSION. A neighbouring document with a similar name is not this one.
- Wallet support is not the same as consensus validity.
What happened after the paper
The source marks this deployed. That is a statement about the text, not a promise that every wallet or node has shipped it. Later documents can narrow, replace, or ignore this one. Cite the number you mean.
What to check before you use the idea
- What is covered by the signed bytes in PSBT Version 2?
- Can the same signature be replayed on another chain, account, or message?
- Which primitive does the text require: PSBT, PSBT_GLOBAL_UNSIGNED_TX, PSBT_GLOBAL_VERSION?
Terms
- BIP 370
- The public text titled PSBT Version 2.
- Deployed
- The document's own label for how finished the text is. It is not a market fact.
The problem the paper names
A signature that does not commit to what the user saw can be replayed into a different spend, a different chain, or a different message.
What the design proposes
- PSBT Version 2 (PSBTv2) only specifies new fields and field inclusion/exclusion requirements.
- PSBT_GLOBAL_UNSIGNED_TX must be excluded in PSBTv2.
- PSBT_GLOBAL_VERSION must be included in PSBTv2 and set to version number 2 '''What happened to version number 1?''' Version number 1 is skipped because PSBT Version 0 has been colloquially referred to as version 1.
How the mechanism is specified
- Taken from the specification, the next constraint is: PSBT_GLOBAL_UNSIGNED_TX must be excluded in PSBTv2.
- Locate PSBT, PSBT_GLOBAL_UNSIGNED_TX, PSBT_GLOBAL_VERSION in BIP 370 and apply it to one transaction or call.
- Then check the failure the class of rule always has: a node that did not upgrade, a reverted call, a replayed signature, or a peer that does not speak the message.
What this page does not treat as proven
- A signature scheme is not a privacy system. It hides the signer only if the protocol says so.
- Wallet support is not the same as consensus validity.
- The source marks this deployed. That is a statement about the text, not a promise that every wallet or node has shipped it.
Why a venture studio still reads it
Use BIP 370 when a pitch says 'PSBT Version 2' without saying whether the rule is consensus, policy, or an interface. The number is the citation. The pitch is not.
This is Blockchain Lab's reading of a public design paper. It is not the paper, not a copy of it, and not an offer of tokens, equity, custody or a partnership. Later network behaviour can diverge from the text. Nothing here is investment, legal or technical advice.
Research status: Design paper. Last reviewed: 1 October 2026. This is a reading of a public paper, not investment, legal or security advice.
