Research corpusPrivacyBLC-STUDY-0101
Nova: Recursive Zero-Knowledge Arguments from Folding Schemes
Incrementally verifiable computation without putting a SNARK inside a SNARK. A folding scheme compresses two instances of a computation into one instance of the same size. Repeating that fold is the recursion. The paper is about prover cost, not about a chain.
- Official external source only
- Design paper
- Official source
Record
- Authors
- Abhiram Kothapalli, Srinath Setty and Ioanna Tzialla
- Date
- 2021
- Publisher
- Abhiram Kothapalli, Srinath Setty and Ioanna Tzialla
- Version
- Source cited by the 2021 study. The study is the reading. This page does not add a second essay.
- Document ID
- BLC-STUDY-0101
- DOI
- None recorded
- Last reviewed
- 1 October 2026
- Licence
- No licence recorded. Rights status under review.
No hash is published. This build does not store those PDF bytes, so a checksum would be invented. Where a legacy path exists, it points at the Internet Archive copy of the old library.
Direct answer
Incrementally verifiable computation without putting a SNARK inside a SNARK. A folding scheme compresses two instances of a computation into one instance of the same size. Repeating that fold is the recursion. The paper is about prover cost, not about a chain.
Where to read
- Official source — ePrint 2021/370
- Blockchain Lab study, the canonical readingOriginal commentary. Not a transcription of the paper.
Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.
Full text
Full text is not published on this page. Public availability is not a licence to republish a document. Blockchain Lab has not recorded a licence that permits an HTML transcription, a training set, or a retrieval corpus of the paper. Text on this page is Blockchain Lab's own wording, or a pointer to a study that is also Blockchain Lab's wording.
What changed
The study separates the text from later network behaviour. This bibliographic page does not repeat that essay.
Relationships
- Canonical readingNova study
- Related paperHalo
- Related paperPLONK
- Related paperCairo
Cite this record
These citations point at the source document. They are not a licence to copy it.
Author–date
Kothapalli, A., Setty, S., & Tzialla, I. (2021). Nova: Recursive Zero-Knowledge Arguments from Folding Schemes. Abhiram Kothapalli, Srinath Setty and Ioanna Tzialla. https://eprint.iacr.org/2021/370
BibTeX
@techreport{nova2021,
title = {Nova: Recursive Zero-Knowledge Arguments from Folding Schemes},
author = {Abhiram Kothapalli, Srinath Setty and Ioanna Tzialla},
year = {2021},
institution = {Abhiram Kothapalli, Srinath Setty and Ioanna Tzialla},
url = {https://eprint.iacr.org/2021/370},
note = {Rights status: Official external source only. Blockchain Lab record: https://blockchainlab.com/research/corpus/papers/nova}
}RIS
TY - RPRT TI - Nova: Recursive Zero-Knowledge Arguments from Folding Schemes AU - Abhiram Kothapalli AU - Srinath Setty AU - Ioanna Tzialla PY - 2021 PB - Abhiram Kothapalli, Srinath Setty and Ioanna Tzialla UR - https://eprint.iacr.org/2021/370 N1 - Rights status: Official external source only ER -
CSL-JSON
[
{
"type": "report",
"id": "BLC-STUDY-0101",
"title": "Nova: Recursive Zero-Knowledge Arguments from Folding Schemes",
"author": [
{
"literal": "Abhiram Kothapalli"
},
{
"literal": "Srinath Setty"
},
{
"literal": "Ioanna Tzialla"
}
],
"issued": {
"date-parts": [
[
2021
]
]
},
"publisher": "Abhiram Kothapalli, Srinath Setty and Ioanna Tzialla",
"URL": "https://eprint.iacr.org/2021/370",
"note": "Rights status: Official external source only. Not a licence to republish the paper."
}
]Rights record
- Source status
- Official source
- Use status
- Metadata and commentary only. The reading is the study page.
- Rights
- Official external source only
- Training and retrieval
- Not permitted from this site. There is no rights-cleared full text to retrieve or to train on.
