Compare
Four documents, the same five questions.
No throughput league table and no yield. The cells are what this library is willing to say about the text.
| Question | Embedding transaction status code in receipts |
|---|---|
| What the text proposes | EIP 658, Embedding transaction status code in receipts. This EIP replaces the intermediate state root field of the receipt with a status code indicating if the top-level call succeeded or failed. |
| Who may write | Nick Johnson |
| What is settled | This EIP replaces the intermediate state root field of the receipt with a status code indicating if the top-level call succeeded or failed. |
| Load-bearing assumption | A gas or opcode change is not a throughput benchmark. It is a relative price and a validity rule. |
| What this library says afterwards | Status in the source: Final. A reading of the public specification, not a copy of it and not a certification. |
| Rights | Official external source only |