Skip to content

BLOCKCHAIN LAB BRIEFING · STABLECOINS

DAI Is as Sound as Its Collateral and Its Oracles. The Peg Is the Output.

Maker, later associated with Sky, issues a dollar-targeted token against collateral that can be liquidated. That is overcollateralised credit. It is not a claim on a bank.

2 October 2026

All briefings

01

What happened

Users mint DAI by locking accepted collateral and paying a stability fee. If value falls through a ratio, liquidators repay the debt and take the collateral. Governance chooses the collateral and the oracles.

At times a large share of backing has been other dollar tokens and real-world arrangements. The mix is a parameter.

02

Why it matters

An integration is an integration of a governed collateral set. A change in collateral changes the risk without a change in the symbol. Liquidation can defend a peg and still be a bad moment to depend on the market.

03

The operating layer

Track collateral and oracle changes the way you track a reserve report. Do not pass a savings rate on to your own users as if it were contractual.

Name governance as an operational dependency.

04

What is verified

Maker’s public documentation describes collateralised minting, liquidation and governance. Live collateral shares are not restated here.

05

What remains unclear

The current collateral list. Which oracle a liquidation uses, and how stale it may be.

06

The catch

Overcollateralisation is a buffer, not a promise. It fails if collateral gaps, if oracles stall, or if governance admits assets that do not trade when they must.

Not a recommendation to borrow or to hold DAI.

WATCH

What builders should watch

  1. 01The collateral list and liquidation ratios.
  2. 02Oracle source and staleness.
  3. 03Any savings rate, described as a governance output.

BOTTOM LINE

Read the collateral. The ticker is not the asset.

Sources

Blockchain Lab uses public social posts as reporting leads, not as proof. Every published briefing is assessed against primary sources, available documentation and relevant technical context. Social engagement is not used as evidence of the underlying claim.

Continue